Category: Note / Memorandum / Remark

Overview

​​

Miroirs, M. 43, is a five-movement piano suite composed by Maurice Ravel between 1904 and 1905. The work, dedicated to members of the artist group Les Apaches (a circle of Ravel’s friends), reflects the aesthetic concerns and innovations of the time. Each piece is a sonic portrait or “image” of nature or a character, hence the title “Miroirs.” Ravel used unconventional harmony and technical virtuosity to create textures and moods that evoke the titles of each movement.

Movements and themes

“Noctuids” (Moths) 🦋 : This first movement, dedicated to Léon – Paul Fargue, is an impressionistic and swirling piece. The rapid arpeggios and dissonant harmonies evoke the erratic flight and lightness of moths. The piece is a study in the sonority of the piano.

“Sad Birds” (Sad Birds) 😔 : Dedicated to Ricardo Viñes , the pianist who created the work, this movement is characterized by its deep melancholy and dark harmonies. The repetitive notes and short, angular motifs mimic the cries of birds, creating an atmosphere of solitude and sadness.

“A boat on the ocean” (A boat on the ocean ) 🌊 : This movement is a descriptive and evocative piece that depicts the movements of water. The complex arpeggiated passages and flowing chords illustrate the rocking of the boat and the waves of the ocean. The music is constantly evolving, capturing the vastness and mystery of the sea.

“Alborada del gracioso” (Aubade of the jester) 🤡 : This is the most famous and virtuoso movement of the suite. Dedicated to Michel-Dimitri Calvocoressi, it is Spanish-inspired. The piece combines dance rhythms, bold harmonies, and dazzling piano technique. The fast passages and percussive trills mimic the sound of the guitar, evoking a scene of celebration and gaiety .

“The Valley of Bells” (The Valley of Bells) 🔔 : The last movement is dedicated to Maurice Delage. It has a more static and contemplative sound. The music evokes the distant sound of bells echoing through a valley. Ravel uses clear harmonies and layered notes to create a reverberating and echoing effect .

Heritage and influence
Miroirs is considered a major work of early 20th- century piano music . It marks a turning point in Ravel’s career, demonstrating his mastery of impressionist language while also announcing his interest in exotic sounds and virtuosity. The work is often interpreted as a reflection of the composer’s soul, but also as a mirror of the musical aesthetics of his time, which emphasized the evocation of moods and suggestion over classical thematic development. The work’s influence can be found in many composers who have explored new harmonic and technical paths for the piano.

History

The genesis of Miroirs takes us back to the early 20th century , a period of artistic ferment and intellectual exchange in Paris. Maurice Ravel, a young composer on the rise, was an active member of a circle of artists and intellectuals known as the Apaches. This group, which met regularly , included poets , musicians, and painters, and their discussions focused on the new aesthetic ideas and innovations of their time.

It was in this context of friendship and shared creativity that Ravel undertook, between 1904 and 1905, the composition of his piano suite Miroirs. The work was not a simple collection of pieces , but a true homage to his friends. Ravel dedicated each of the five movements to a specific member of the group. The work is thus a mirror of this friendship, a musical reflection of the personalities and worlds of his close friends. The word “Miroirs” itself , according to Ravel, should not be interpreted in a subjectivist sense of art, but as a series of images, of sound reflections.

The premiere of the work was entrusted to another member of the Apaches, the pianist Ricardo Viñes . He was a close friend of Ravel and one of his most fervent interpreters . He gave the work its public premiere on January 6, 1906 , at the Société nationale de musique in Paris. The public and critical reception was mixed, with the modernity of the harmonies and the technical audacity disconcerting some listeners, but one piece in particular, the “Alborada del gracioso,” was an immediate success and was even encored .

Ravel himself considered Miroirs a landmark work in his own career. He claimed that it had “definitively marked [ his ] harmonic evolution,” recognizing the importance of this suite in his quest for a more personal and innovative musical language. Indeed, in Miroirs, Ravel moved away from the influence of Fauré to embrace a more complex style of writing, one that layered sonorities and pushed the boundaries of pianistic virtuosity. The work thus solidified his reputation as a major figure in the French musical avant-garde .

Over time, Ravel would orchestrate two of the movements, “Une barque sur l’océan” and “Alborada del gracioso,” demonstrating their symphonic potential and ensuring their longevity within the orchestral repertoire. Miroirs remains a testament to Ravel’s creativity , his friendship with Les Apaches, and his essential role in the evolution of piano music in the 20th century.

Characteristics of Music

The musical characteristics of Maurice Ravel’s Miroirs, M. 43, are primarily marked by harmonic innovation, pianistic virtuosity, and a descriptive or “impressionistic ” approach to composition. The work, composed in 1905, represents a turning point in the evolution of Ravel’s style, moving away from more classical influences to explore new sonorities .

Harmony and musical language

Ravel deliberately broke with the harmonic conventions of the time to create unique moods. He made extensive use of chromaticism and whole-tone scales, which weakened the sense of traditional tonality and created a sense of floating or mystery . The music is filled with bold, often unresolved dissonances and chords that approach bitonality. This harmonic complexity contributes to the richness and depth of the work. The composer himself stated that Miroirs had “disconcerted the musicians most accustomed until then to [his] manner ” of composing.

Virtuosity and pianistic texture

Each piece in the suite is a technical challenge for the pianist, illustrating Ravel’s mastery of the instrument. Virtuosity is not an end in itself, but a means of expression that serves the musical objective.

In “Noctuelles”, the rapid arpeggios and chromatic movements create the image of the flight of moths.

“A Boat on the Ocean” is characterized by fluid and complex arpeggios that imitate the swaying of waves.

The pinnacle of virtuosity is found in the “Alborada del gracioso”, with its extremely rapid repeated notes , its glissandi , and its percussive simulation of the guitar, a true pianistic tour de force.

Role of timbre and sound color

Ravel uses the piano not only as a melodic instrument, but also as a palette of timbres, seeking to imitate the sounds of an orchestra. He employs a wide range of registers, from the ethereal sweetness of the treble to the deep resonances of the bass, to create evocative sonic tableaux. The titles of the pieces guide the listener to these images: the isolated bird calls in “Oiseaux tristes” or the reverberation of sound in “La vallée des cloches.”

The work is a demonstration of Ravel’s individual style and his modernism, at the crossroads between the classical heritage and the new sonic explorations of the 20th century . It is both a culmination of his previous research and a prelude to future masterpieces such as Gaspard de la nuit.

Style(s), movement(s) and period of composition

Maurice Ravel’s piano suite Miroirs, M. 43, clearly stands at the intersection of modernism and musical impressionism, a pivotal period in the early 20th century . Composed in 1905, the work is both innovative and a break with previous musical traditions .

Movement and period

Mirrors is one of the masterpieces of the French Impressionist repertoire . This movement, often compared to Impressionist painting, emphasizes suggestion, sound color, and the creation of atmosphere , rather than strict melodic and harmonic structures. Ravel uses the piano to evoke images and sensations, such as the changing light on water or the flight of nocturnal insects. The work is contemporary with that of Claude Debussy, the other great master of musical Impressionism.

However, Miroirs is also firmly rooted in musical modernism, which sought to explore new frontiers in harmony , rhythm, and form. Ravel, with his precision and commitment to innovation, distinguished himself from his predecessors and deliberately ” disconcerted” his contemporaries with his bold harmonic choices.

Style and innovation

At the time of its composition, Miroirs was a new and profoundly innovative music. In it, Ravel moved away from the formal structures of Classicism and Romanticism to favor a writing style that directly serves the evocation of the movement titles. Unlike Baroque , Classical, or Romantic music, which follows clear melodic and harmonic conventions, Ravel’s music in Miroirs is characterized by :

Non-traditional harmony: The widespread use of chromaticism, whole-tone scales, and complex dissonances weakens the tonal center and creates a sense of floating. Ravel explores sonorities that border on bitonality (the use of two different keys simultaneously ), which was a bold approach at the time.

Expressive virtuosity : The piano technique is pushed to its paroxysm, but it serves to paint sound scenes . In the “Alborada del gracioso”, the repeated notes and glissandi are not simple technical feats, but imitations of the sound of a Spanish guitar, an example of his nationalist (here, Spanish) style .

Piano orchestration: Ravel uses the piano as a palette of orchestral colors. The writing is dense and complex, layering textures and timbres to create sonic effects comparable to those of an orchestra. This is one of the reasons why he later orchestrated two of the suite’s movements himself .

In summary , Miroirs is a work that bears witness to a transition, merging the poetic sensibility of Impressionism with the bold harmonic language and virtuosity of Modernism.

Analysis: Form, Technique(s), Texture, Harmony, Rhythm

To analyze Maurice Ravel’s Miroirs, M. 43, one must consider its innovative features in form , harmony, and texture. The music of this piano suite is polyphonic and homorhythmic, with harmony that departs from traditional rules , a chromatic and pentatonic scale, and a complex rhythm.

Form and Structure

Miroirs is a piano suite in five movements. Although there is no classical thematic development between the movements, each piece has its own structure. Ravel often uses a ternary form (ABA’) or freer structures, inspired by the subject of each movement.

arpeggiated passages returning.

“Oiseaux tristes” is more static and is organized around an ostinato motif, creating an atmosphere of desolation .

“A Boat on the Ocean” is a descriptive piece with a fluid structure that imitates the movements of water.

“Alborada del gracioso” is a masterpiece of the form, with a central section (B) contrasting with the fast and percussive outer sections (A).

“The Valley of Bells” uses a simpler structure, based on the repetition of sound patterns to create an effect of echo and resonance .

Texture and Polyphony

The texture of Miroirs is rich and complex, primarily polyphonic. Ravel creates superpositions of melodic lines and harmonic patterns to produce sonic color effects. Although most of the movements are polyphonic, some parts are homorhythmic, such as the chordal passages. However, even in these passages, Ravel often uses dissonant notes to add tension and harmonic richness.

Harmony, Scale and Tonality

The harmony of Miroirs is decidedly modern for its time. Ravel moves away from traditional tonality to explore complex chords and unresolved dissonances .

Scales: The composer uses a wide variety of scales for his effects. The chromatic scale is omnipresent, especially in “Noctuelles,” to create flowing, swirling passages. The whole-tone scale is also used, especially in “Une barque sur l’océan,” to weaken the tonality and create a sense of floating. Ravel also incorporates pentatonic and modal scales to create exotic, impressionistic colors.

Tonality : Tonality is often ambiguous , fluctuating between major and minor keys and using abrupt modulations. Ravel uses 9th, 11th, and 13th chords that enrich the harmony and contribute to the modern feel. The sense of tonality is often more implied than clearly stated .

Pace

The rhythm of Miroirs is varied and complex. Ravel uses clear and precise rhythms, but also subtle and asymmetrical rhythmic figures for the more impressionistic passages.

“Alborada del gracioso” is an excellent example of complex rhythm. Ravel uses syncopated patterns and time signatures to create a passionate and virtuoso Spanish dance effect.

In other movements, such as “Oiseaux tristes,” the rhythm is more erratic and unpredictable, imitating the disordered song of birds.

In summary , the musical analysis of Miroirs reveals a transitional work, which fuses the legacy of Romantic music with harmonic and rhythmic innovations that would define 20th-century musical modernism .

Tutorial, performance tips and important playing points

For a pianist preparing to play Ravel’s Miroirs, mastering the technique is not enough . Performing this work requires a deep understanding of its language, colors, and moods. Here is a tutorial, performance tips, and key points for approaching this suite.

1. Understanding Ravel’s aesthetics: Precision in the service of emotion

Ravel’s style is often described as a mixture of Impressionism and Classicism. This means that emotion and evocation are not the result of unbridled romantic expression , but of extreme precision . Every note, every nuance, every pedal change has a very clear intention .

Performance Tip: Don’t play the work with a purely Romantic approach. Aim for a clear, controlled sound . Beauty lies in the clarity of line and the accuracy of harmonies, even in the fastest passages.

2. The role of the pedal: Creating resonances and echoes

The pedal is an essential tool in Miroirs. Ravel uses the pedal to create resonances, echoes, and harmonic fusions.

Performance tip: Do not overuse the pedal . It is crucial to follow Ravel’s instructions precisely. For example, in “The Valley of the Bells,” the pedal is used to layer notes and create an echoing, reverberating effect . Correct use of the pedal helps distinguish between different timbres and adds depth to the harmony.

3. Approach each movement: key points and technical difficulties

“Noctuids” (Moths)

Key points : The performer must make the impression of erratic and light flight . The arpeggios must be fast but with great clarity .

Technical advice: Work on the fluidity and equality of the hands. Chromatic passages should be played with a very light touch , almost like “touching”. Do not overload the sound.

“Sad Birds” (Sad Birds)

Key points : This movement is an exercise in atmosphere and emotion. The rhythm is often erratic, imitating birdsong. The sound should be thin and dark.

Technical Tip: The challenge lies in mastering articulation and tempo. The touch should be pearly and unconnected , and the rhythm should sound untidy and sad. The birds’ “whines” should be very precise , without being overplayed .

“A Boat on the Ocean” (A Boat on the Ocean )

Key points : The movement is a sound representation of waves. The interpretation should focus on the fluidity and regularity of the arpeggios , like waves coming and going.

Technical tip: Work on wrist flexibility. The left-hand arpeggios should be fluid and regular to create a sonic background, while the right hand can add melodic colors and patterns. The pedal is essential here to tie the harmonies together.

“Alborada del gracioso” (Aubade of the Jester)

Key points : This is the most virtuoso movement of the suite, and the best known. The interpretation must capture the spirit of Spanish dance: lively, percussive and full of pride .

Technical tip: Focus on rhythmic clarity and precision of the repeated notes . The middle section with the arpeggios should be played with great delicacy and a sense of lyricism, in contrast to the percussive character of the beginning and end.

“The Valley of Bells” (The Valley of Bells)

Key Points : The performance should suggest a peaceful and contemplative mood. The goal is to create a layering of sounds, like the echoes of bells echoing across a valley .

Technical tip: The challenge lies in mastering the different layers of sound. The left-hand “bells” should resonate clearly, while the right-hand melodies should float above. The pedal is used carefully to create the echoes, but it is crucial to avoid a muddy sound .

In summary , the performance of Miroirs requires a delicate balance between impeccable technique, rhythmic precision, and sensitivity to color and harmony. It is a work that challenges the pianist not simply to play the notes, but to transform them into sound images .

Successful piece or collection at the time ?

At the time of its premiere in 1906, Maurice Ravel’s Miroirs, M. 43, was not a complete critical success . Rather, the work aroused mixed reactions, even perplexity .

Mixed critical reception

When Ricardo Viñes premiered the suite for the Société Nationale de Musique, Ravel’s boldness and innovation disconcerted some of the audience. The music was considered innovative and avant-garde, but it was not an immediate “popular success ” in the sense of widespread acclaim.

Ravel himself acknowledged that the work had “disconcerted the musicians most accustomed to [his] manner until then.” It was music that broke with late Romanticism and even moved away from the conventions of Impressionism that Debussy had popularized. Audiences and critics were not yet accustomed to such dissonances and bold piano writing .

However, it is important to note that one of the movements, “Alborada del gracioso,” was a notable success from the first performance , so much so that it was encored by the audience. The dazzling virtuosity and lively rhythms of this piece immediately won over the listeners.

Sale of scores

Regarding the sales of the scores, it is difficult to obtain precise figures from the time. However, it can be assumed that it was not a great initial commercial success, given its critical reception. Sheet music of modern and complex music like Miroirs is generally intended for a smaller audience of professional musicians and advanced students, and not for the general public.

Despite this, the publisher Demets did publish the work in 1906, a sign that its artistic importance was recognized, even if its commercial appeal was not evident.

Over time, however, the work gained recognition and became one of the major works of the early 20th-century piano repertoire . Today, scores of Miroirs are widely available and are considered a standard for pianists worldwide. Its success was built not on immediate popularity , but on its enduring musical value and importance in music history.

Famous Recordings

Recordings of Ravel’s Miroirs are a subject of heated debate among music lovers and critics, as the work demands both technical virtuosity and a keen sensitivity to color and atmosphere . Here is a selection of famous recordings , categorized by type of performance .

Historical and traditional recordings

These recordings are valuable because they offer a glimpse into an era when performers were closer to the composers themselves .

Vlado Perlemuter (1955): Perlemuter was a student of Ravel. His recording is often considered a benchmark for its faithfulness to the score’s indications. His playing is crystal clear, with an innate sense of rhythm and perfect articulation, capturing both Ravel’s precision and poetry .

Robert Casadesus ( 1950s): Casadesus, another renowned French pianist, offers a performance of great elegance and structural clarity. His Ravel is more “classical” and less mystical, but it highlights the melodic lines and the internal logic of the work .

Walter Gieseking (1954): Gieseking was a master of sound color and pedaling. His recording of Ravel is famous for its impressionistic ” blur” and ability to create magical , ethereal atmospheres , even if some may find it less technically precise.

Samson François (1967): Samson François’ recording is very personal and fascinating. His interpretation is more “romantic” and eccentric, with great rhythmic freedom and an often daring sound. It is a very controversial interpretation , but it has many followers for its passion and originality .

Standard and modern recordings

These recordings have become benchmarks for their balance between tradition and modernity, often with higher quality sound recording .

Martha Argerich (1974): Argentine Martha Argerich’s performance is legendary. She combines astonishing virtuosity with incredible energy . Her “Alborada del gracioso” is considered by many to be one of the finest recordings in history, but she also brings great poetry to ” Oiseaux tristes” and “La vallée des cloches.”

Sviatoslav Richter (1960): Although Richter’s recording is of great strength and technical power, his Ravel is less impressionistic and more structural and dramatic in approach. It is a powerful and introspective interpretation.

Jean-Yves Thibaudet (1995): Thibaudet is a major interpreter of French music . His recording of Miroirs is renowned for its delicacy, clarity, and sense of color. It combines French precision with a modern sensibility.

Contemporary and acclaimed interpretations

Today’s pianists bring new perspectives to the work, often with breathtaking virtuosity and high-fidelity sound recording .

French pianist Chamayou is considered one of Ravel’s greatest interpreters . His recording has received numerous awards for its technical precision, luminous sound, and poetic sense .

Alexandre Tharaud (2003): Tharaud offers a very fine interpretation, very faithful to the spirit of the work. His Ravel is characterized by its transparency and meticulous attention to detail, which makes it a reference recording .

Seong-Jin Cho (2020): The young Korean pianist caused a sensation with his recording of Ravel. His technique is impeccable and he brings a modern clarity and energy to the work. His interpretation is both powerful and poetic.

Episodes and anecdotes

1. Birth in the circle of the Apaches

Mirrors has a history deeply tied to friendship. The work was composed for members of the Apaches artistic and intellectual circle, a group of Ravel’s friends who met on Saturdays. The name “Apaches” was given to them by a journalist, and they happily adopted it , symbolizing their rejection of convention. Ravel dedicated each of the five movements to a particular friend:

“Noctuelles” by the poet L éon -Paul Fargue.

“Sad Birds” by pianist Ricardo Vi ñ es.

“A boat on the ocean ” by the artist Paul Sordes.

“Alborada del gracioso” to the music critic Michel-Dimitri Calvocoressi.

“The Valley of the Bells” to the composer Maurice Delage.

The work was therefore much more than a simple suite; it was a personal tribute to those who surrounded and inspired him.

2. The instant success of “Alborada del gracioso”

Viñes premiered the suite in 1906 , the audience was taken aback by the work’s modernity. However, the “Alborada del gracioso” immediately won over listeners. The piece , with its frenetic rhythm and spectacular virtuosity , impressed the audience so much that it was encored at its premiere . The success of this piece alone , in a way, justified the audacity of the entire work and predicted its future success .

3. Titles: mirrors of nature and the soul

The titles in the suite have profound meaning. Ravel explained that the title Miroirs did not refer to a reflection of the composer’s soul, but rather to sonic “images” or “reflections” of nature and emotions. For example, “Oiseaux tristes” is not just a description of birds, but an evocation of their melancholic song. Similarly , “Une barque sur l’océan” is not a simple representation of water, but an immersion in the movement and vastness of the ocean. It is a work that invites the listener to “see” the sound.

4. Refusal of decoration

Although the work is impressionistic and descriptive, Ravel always insisted on the precision of his writing and his rejection of improvisation and gratuitous ornamentation. It is said that when a pianist played one of Ravel’s pieces a little too freely, the composer reprimanded him, insisting that “it is chamber music,” implying that it should be played with the clarity and discipline of a string quartet . This anecdote illustrates Ravel’s vision: his music, however evocative, is a careful construction and not the product of decorative fantasy .

Similar compositions

The piano collections and suites related to Maurice Ravel’s Miroirs share several characteristics: a bold harmonic language, a concern for sound color, descriptive inspiration, and a high degree of virtuosity . These works are often at the heart of the Impressionist and Modernist repertoire of the early 20th century .

Here are some similar compositions:

1. Works by Ravel himself

Gaspard de la nuit (1908): Often considered the counterpart to Miroirs, Gaspard de la nuit pushes the exploration of the piano even further. It is a work of extreme technical virtuosity , even more difficult than Miroirs. The three movements, “Ondine,” “Le Gibet,” and “Scarbo,” are dark and fantastical tableaux inspired by the poems of Aloysius Bertrand, and share with Miroirs the descriptive approach.

Le Tombeau de Couperin (1917): Composed as a tribute to Ravel’s friends who died during the First World War, this suite has a more neoclassical approach than Miroirs. However, it retains the refinement of Ravel’s piano writing, with passages of great clarity and subtle polyphony.

2. Works by Claude Debussy

Claude Debussy is the great master of musical impressionism and the main source of comparison for Ravel.

Images (1905-1907): Composed in two series, Images is a collection of six pieces that explore similar themes to Mirrors. Pieces such as “Reflections in the Water” and “Bells Through the Leaves” share a strong resemblance in their use of sound color and resonance .

Preludes (1910-1913): Debussy’s two books of Preludes are a collection of short pieces with evocative titles (e.g., “The Sunken Cathedral,” “Fireworks”). As in Mirrors, each prelude is an exploration of a single musical idea or atmosphere .

3. Works by Spanish and other nationalist composers

The Spanish influence is very present in the “Alborada del gracioso”, and we can find this same atmosphere in the works of his contemporaries.

Isaac Albéniz – Iberia (1905-1908): This suite is considered one of the pinnacles of Spanish piano music. Albé niz depicts the different regions of Spain with a rich harmonic language, complex rhythms, and dazzling virtuosity.

Manuel de Falla – Fantasia B æ tica (1919): A masterpiece of piano music which, like the “Alborada del gracioso”, is inspired by Andalusian music, with imitations of the guitar and dance rhythms.

4. Other composers of the period

Alexander Scriabin – Sonata No. 2 (1897): Although later romantic in style, this sonata, nicknamed the “Fantasy Sonata,” presents elements of sound color and impressionism that herald the modernity of Ravel and Debussy.

Paul Dukas – Variations, Interlude and Finale on a Theme by Rameau (1903): Less well-known, this piece shows a sophisticated use of harmony and piano, in a spirit that can recall the meticulousness of Ravel.

(This article was generated by Gemini. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Overview

​​

Maurice Ravel’s Grotesque Serenade, M. 5, is an early piano piece, composed in 1893 when he was only 18 years old. The work is remarkable for several reasons:

Youth and influence: This is an early work that already shows the seeds of Ravel’s style, although it is strongly influenced by his predecessor Emmanuel Chabrier, particularly by his sense of rhythm and his bold harmonies. Ravel himself , in retrospect , felt that Chabrier’s influence was too present, and the piece was not published until after his death.

Title and character : The grotesque title refers , according to musicological analysis, to the fantasy of the rhythms, the piquant harmonies and the very contrasting and excessive nuances of the score. The work has an “amphigory, buffoonish” atmosphere.

Structure and musical elements : The piece, in F-sharp minor, is simple in form, with a slower, lyrical central section, marked “very sentimental ,” which contrasts with the “very rude ” character of the main section. It features very precise playing indications such as “pizzicatissimo,” which recall the string effects of bowed instruments , and alternating triads between the hands that prefigure more famous works such as the opening of the Alborada del gracioso.

Publication and premiere: The score of the Grotesque Serenade was not published during the composer’s lifetime. It was premiered in New York in 1975 by musicologist Arbie Orenstein and published by Salabert the same year , almost 40 years after Ravel ‘s death.

In summary , the Grotesque Serenade is a fascinating early work that testifies to the emergence of a musical genius. It already reveals Ravel ‘s taste for sound colors, inventive rhythms and subtle harmonies, thus announcing the masterpieces to come.

History

The story of the Grotesque Serenade , M. 5, is that of an early work that has long lain dormant in the shadows. Composed by Maurice Ravel in 1893, when he was only 18 years old, it is a fascinating testament to the composer’s early life. At this time, Ravel was studying at the Paris Conservatoire and absorbed the influences of his elders , notably Emmanuel Chabrier, whose audacity and originality he admired .

Ravel was always highly critical of his early works , and the Serenade Grotesque was no exception. He later felt it owed too much to Chabrier’s influence and chose never to have it published during his lifetime. The manuscript remained in his archives, a sort of personal memento of his artistic maturation.

This is how the piece remained unpublished for decades. Its history only resumed in 1975, almost forty years after the composer’s death. It was the American musicologist Arbie Orenstein who, working on Ravel’s archives, unearthed the manuscript of this forgotten score. He then had it published by Salabert and gave his own public performance in New York in February of the same year .

The unearthing of the Serenade Grotesque has completed the picture of Ravel’s development. Although the composer did not consider the piece worthy of publication during his lifetime, it revealed to musicologists and pianists the vivacity of his precocious genius . The “grotesque” rhythms and bold harmonies it contains already demonstrate Ravel ‘s unique musical personality, even though he had not yet fully developed the language that would make him world-famous. It is the story of an early work that found its way into the master’s catalogue long after he had left the stage .

Characteristics of Music

Serenade , composed in 1893, is an early work for piano that already exhibits many of the characteristics that would come to define his style.

Structure and Harmony

The piece, in F-sharp minor, is simple in form, with an ABA’ ternary structure. It begins with an A section with a “very rude ” and “amphigory, buffoonish” character , marked by bold harmonies and dissonances. This section contrasts sharply with the slower and more lyrical central B section, marked “very sentimental “. The harmony is more traditional, before returning to the initial mood of the A section, but with variations.

Rhythm and Texture

Rhythm plays a central role in this composition. The title’s “grotesque ” indication is often interpreted as referring to the whimsical rhythms and the marked contrasts in the score. There are passages with unexpected syncopations and accents that give the piece its lively, almost mechanical character .

Texture is also very important. The piece is peppered with very precise playing indications . For example, the beginning is notated “pizzicatissimo,” an effect that imitates the plucked sound of the strings of a bowed instrument . This search for timbres is a trademark of Ravel, who was already discovering himself as a “subtle colorist” on the piano. Another distinctive feature is the alternation of triads between the hands, a technique that, according to analyses, prefigures the opening of his later piece , the Alborada del gracioso.

Expression and Nuances

The nuances are extreme and contrasting, with indications such as fortissimo (very loud) and pianissimo (very soft) abruptly succeeding each other. Ravel uses these contrasts to create an effect of surprise and accentuate the “grotesque” character of the music. The piece alternates between an ironic wit and moments of sincerity and lyricism, which demonstrates the expressive richness of the young composer.

Style(s), movement(s) and period of composition

The Grotesque Serenade , composed in 1893, is situated at a pivotal period in Maurice Ravel ‘s development. It cannot be attributed to a single movement, but shows a mixture of influences and characteristics that prefigure his later style.

Style and Movement

At the time of its composition, Ravel was a young student at the Paris Conservatoire, and the piece is deeply rooted in the style of his elder , Emmanuel Chabrier. It borrows from Chabrier its bold harmonies, its piquant rhythms, and its sense of color.

However, it cannot be simply described as “romantic” or “post-romantic” in the strict sense. Although Romanticism was still dominant, Ravel deviated from it. There are elements that herald musical impressionism, such as the search for timbres and colors on the piano (for example, the ” pizzicatissimo” ).

Nor is the piece purely nationalistic, even though Ravel would later draw on his Basque and Spanish roots. Here, the character is more fanciful and “grotesque,” as the title suggests.

Innovation vs. Tradition

The Grotesque Serenade is both traditional and innovative. It is traditional in its simple form (ABA’), but innovative in its harmonic language and sound effects.

In 1893, this music was new to the ears. It pushed harmonic conventions and explored piano textures unusual for the time. It was an experimental work that showed Ravel was not content with the achievements of Classicism or Romanticism.

It is not yet avant-garde in the sense that it would later be understood (as with Stravinsky or the Vienna School), but it is clearly a step in the direction of early 20th-century modernism . It is a transitional work that encapsulates the influences of the past while announcing the future of one of the greatest French composers .

This document presents a recording of a performance of the Grotesque Serenade , which allows you to hear its style and musical characteristics.

Analysis: Form, Technique(s), Texture, Harmony, Rhythm

Serenade , composed in 1893, is a piano work which, despite its brevity , reveals a great wealth of techniques and structures.

Method (s) and Technique(s)

Ravel employed several piano techniques that were innovative for the time. One of the most notable is the use of “pizzicatissimo” notation, which imitates the plucked sound of the strings of a bowed instrument . This technique exemplifies the exploration of sound colors and timbres that would characterize his later work. There are also rapid alternations of triads between the two hands, a texture that creates a continuous, mechanical movement, prefiguring passages in works such as the Alborada del gracioso.

Texture and Polyphony

The music of the Grotesque Serenade is primarily polyphonic. Although written for a single instrument, the piano, it is composed of several independent voices or melodic lines that intertwine . The main theme is often supported by an accompaniment that has its own rhythmic and melodic life. The texture is dense, and the different layers of sound overlap to create a complex whole, far from the simplicity of monophony.

Form and Structure

The piece follows a simple ternary form, ABA’.

Section A: Marked “Very harsh “, it sets out the main theme , characterized by a piquant rhythm and dissonant harmonies.

Section B: Noted “very sentimental ,” it offers a marked contrast. The texture lightens, the tempo slows, and the melody becomes more lyrical and expressive.

Section A’: The piece returns to the initial character of Section A, but with variations and developments that intensify the subject before the conclusion.

Harmony, Tonality , Scale and Rhythm

The piece is mainly in F- sharp minor. The harmony is bold for the time and makes use of unresolved dissonances, sevenths and ninths that give the music its “grotesque” and modern character . The scale used is mainly the harmonic and melodic minor scale, but it is treated in an unconventional manner .

Rhythm is one of the most distinctive aspects of the composition. The “grotesque” character is largely due to syncopations and unexpected accents. Ravel plays with rhythmic balance, creating a sense of unstable movement and fantasy. This treatment of rhythm shows the influence of Chabrier and foreshadows Ravel’s highly elaborate rhythmic sense .

Tutorial, performance tips and important playing points

Performing Ravel ‘s Sérénade Grotesque on the piano is both a technical and stylistic exercise. Here’s a tutorial with tips and key points for approaching it.

Things to remember before you begin

The Spirit of the Play : The title “grotesque ” is key. It should be understood not as “ugly,” but as “fanciful,” “eccentric,” or even “grotesquely exaggerated . ” The play should be theatrical and witty.

Influences: Keep in mind the influence of Chabrier. You have to add panache, a certain rusticity and overflowing energy , with frank and unhesitating rhythms .

Extreme Contrasts : The piece is made of contrasts. The transition from “ Very harsh ” to “ Very sentimental ” must be clear and seamless. It is the juxtaposition of these two worlds that gives the work its meaning .

Tutorial and interpretation tips, section by section

1. The beginning: “Very rough ”

Rhythm: The first challenge is rhythm. The tempo indication is ♩ = 120, which is fast. Syncopations and triplets must be played with great precision. Do not play in a “smooth” manner ; the rhythm must be sharp and angular, almost raw.

Texture: The score says ” pizzicatissimo ,” which is crucial. Ravel wants a dry, almost percussive sound, as if a violinist were plucking the strings. To achieve this, you have to use a very light and quick touch with the fingers, without using the weight of the arm, and cut the sound immediately. It’s a technique of striking rather than weight.

Harmony: The dissonances at the beginning (the augmented fourth, for example) should sound intentional. Don’t be afraid of the harshness of these chords. This is what gives the music its ” rough ” and “grotesque” character .

2. The environment: “very sentimental ”

The change: The change in character should be sudden . Slow down immediately and switch to a completely different touch .

Touch: Forget the technique from the beginning. Here, you have to play with a round, warm sound, using the sustain pedal to tie the harmonies together. Legato is essential. The melody must sing, it must be carried .

Phrasing: The phrasing should be long and breathing, like a lyrical sentence. Don’t cut the melody; on the contrary, let it blossom. It is the emotional heart of the piece .

3. The return to “Very rough ”

Contrast: The return to the initial section should be just as abrupt as the middle passage. Recall the tempo, strength, and “rough” character of the first part .

Variations: Ravel adds new rhythmic and textural variations. Pay attention to chord changes and accents. The end of the piece is a coda that recapitulates the initial “rough” character . The final chords should be percussive and decisive, like a final punch.

for general interpretation
precision : This is the most difficult point of the piece . Slowly work on each rhythmic figure (off-beat triplets, syncopations) so that it is perfectly in place.

Dynamics: Dynamic contrasts are as important as touch contrasts. Move from fortissimo to pianissimo and vice versa seamlessly.

Pedal : Use the pedal sparingly in the “Very Harsh” section to keep the sound dry and percussive, but generously in the ” Very Sentimental” section to tie the harmonies together.

In conclusion, the Grotesque Serenade requires great technical mastery , but above all an understanding of its spirit. It is a character piece that demands audacity and imagination on the part of the pianist.

Famous Recordings

Since Maurice Ravel’s Serenade Grotesque was only published in 1975 , there are no historical recordings in the classical sense of the term, that is , made by pianists of Ravel’s time. However, the piece has been included in cycles of Ravel ‘s complete piano works , which allows us to find excellent performances .

Recordings of the great tradition and standards

Jean-Yves Thibaudet: His recording is often cited as a reference . Thibaudet excels in the clarity, precision and refinement of his playing, which perfectly matches Ravel’s character. His version is both percussive in the “grotesque” moments and very lyrical in the central section.

Angela Hewitt: Known for her complete Ravel works, her interpretation of the Serenade Grotesque is recognized for its technical mastery and musicality. She highlights the contrasts and colors of the score with great elegance .

Samson François : Although his complete works do not include the Sérénade grotesque (it was recorded at a time when the piece was still little known), other pianists in this tradition, such as Vlado Perlemuter (a student of Ravel), were able to include it later. Perlemuter’s interpretation is distinguished by its faithful approach to the composer’s indications.

Modern and contemporary interpretations

Seong-Jin Cho: His recent recording of Ravel’s complete piano works was very well received . His interpretation of the Sérénade grotesque is modern, with remarkable clarity of sound and precise dynamic control , while retaining the playful character of the piece .

André Laplante: This Canadian artist has made highly regarded recordings of Ravel . His interpretation is renowned for its sensitivity and depth, even in an early piece like the Sérénade grotesque .

C édric Tiberghien: Having even contributed to the publication of an urtext score of the piece , his interpretation is considered authoritative . He combines a deep musicological knowledge with great virtuosity to deliver an interpretation that is both faithful and lively.

It is worth noting that other renowned pianists have also recorded the piece , notably Kun-Woo Paik, who offers a powerful and expressive interpretation, and Alexandre Tharaud who brings a very French sensibility to his reading of Ravel’s music.

Episodes and anecdotes

‘s Grotesque Serenade , M. 5, has a rich history of anecdotes, mainly due to its status as a forgotten early work .

1. Ravel’s refusal

The biggest anecdote surrounding this piece is Ravel’s refusal to have it published during his lifetime. Ravel was known for his harsh self-criticism and perfectionism . He considered the Sérénade grotesque a work of apprenticeship, too influenced by his mentor at the time, Emmanuel Chabrier. He felt that it did not fully represent his personal voice and was better left in the drawers. This ruthless judgment on the part of the composer meant that the public was unable to hear it until well after his death .

2. A posthumous discovery

The story of the Grotesque Serenade is itself an anecdote. In 1975, American musicologist Arbie Orenstein was exploring Ravel’s archives, preserved in France. While searching through the manuscripts, he was surprised to discover this handwritten score, dated 1893. He immediately understood the significance of this find, as it offered a unique insight into Ravel’s early life. This discovery had the effect of a small bombshell in the world of musicology. It was Orenstein who subsequently organized its first public performance and publication, giving a second life to a work that Ravel himself had condemned to oblivion .

3. The concert’s forgotten serenade

An amusing anecdote relates to Orenstein’s first public performance of the piece in New York. It was the first time the public had heard this music. The pianist, who was to perform the piece , had to work from a copy of the manuscript, as the score had not yet been officially published . The event was eagerly awaited by specialists . Ravel was already a legend, and the idea of hearing a “new” piece by him, even in his youth, was exciting. It is said that the hall was packed. The audience was surprised by the unusual nature of the piece , which did not resemble the Ravel they knew.

4. The enigma of the “grotesque” title

The meaning of the title “grotesque” has also given rise to debate. Ravel never explicitly explained why he chose this term. Musicologists believe it refers to the burlesque aspect of the music: the eccentric rhythmic character , unexpected dissonances, and abrupt contrasts. The title is a clue to Ravel’s personality, who loved wit and irony. He gave a sense of mystery to this piece , which remains the first of his official works (even if published posthumously) to bear this kind of title.

Similar compositions

1. Works by Emmanuel Chabrier

This is the most obvious reference . The Grotesque Serenade is an early work by Ravel where Emmanuel Chabrier’s influence is most visible. Ravel deeply admired Chabrier and was inspired by his harmonic language and pianistic style.

Emmanuel Chabrier: Ten Picturesque Pieces (1881)

Similarities: We find the same sense of color, lively rhythms and unexpected harmonies. Pieces like “Danse villageoise” and “Scherzo-valse” share with the Sérénade grotesque an energetic and fanciful character .

Emmanuel Chabrier: Bourrée fantasque (1891)

Similarities: This piano piece is famous for its powerful rhythm and its “grotesque” and exuberant character , which certainly influenced Ravel’s conception.

2. Other works by Maurice Ravel

The Grotesque Serenade is a kind of laboratory for Ravel. It contains ideas that he would reuse and develop in later and more famous works .

Maurice Ravel: Alborada del gracioso (1905, for piano)

Similarities: This is probably the composition most similar in spirit to the Grotesque Serenade . The Spanish theme, the lively and percussive character , the virtuosity and the imitations of string instruments ( such as the guitar) are common features. The two pieces share a driving sense of rhythm and bold piano writing.

Maurice Ravel: The Tomb of Couperin (1917)

Similarities: Although much more mature and neo-classical, this piano suite contains movements like the “Forlane” or the “Rigaudon” which possess a rhythmic precision and clear writing which echoes, in its concern for line and texture, that of the Sérénade grotesque, but in a more refined language .

3. Other French composers

Erik Satie: Sports and Entertainment (1914)

Similarities: Although very different in style , Satie’s humorous character , sense of irony and rhythmic experimentation in his piano pieces can be compared to the fantasy of the Sérénade grotesque .

Claude Debussy: Children’s Corner (1908)

Similarities: The “playful” character of certain pieces in this suite (such as “Golliwogg’s Cakewalk”) can be compared to the burlesque and rhythmic spirit of the Grotesque Serenade , although the harmonic language is different .

(This article was generated by Gemini. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Overview

​​

Valse nobles et sentimentales, M. 61 by Maurice Ravel, is a suite of eight waltzes for solo piano, written in 1911. The work was later orchestrated by Ravel in 1912 for use as ballet music for the performance Adé la ï de ou le langage des fleurs. The title of the work is a tribute to Franz Schubert’s collection of waltzes, Valses nobles et sentimentales, D. 969.

Structure and Characteristics

The work consists of eight distinct waltzes, each with its own character and mood. The suite concludes with an epilogue that revisits and juxtaposes the themes of the previous waltzes . The work is characterized by:

A delicate and refined orchestration: The original piano work is already very rich in colors and textures, but Ravel’s orchestration magnifies its nuances.

Complex harmonies and subtle dissonances: Ravel uses enriched chords and chromatic progressions to create an atmosphere that is both romantic and modern.

Altered Waltz Rhythms : Although the work is based on the ternary rhythm of the waltz, Ravel introduces tempo variations, syncopations and unexpected accents that make it more unpredictable and sophisticated .

Historical Context and Influences

Composed during a transitional period in Ravel’s life, the work is influenced by modernism and musical impressionism. Although it is sometimes compared to the impressionism of Claude Debussy, Ravel always sought to distinguish himself through his precision, formal clarity, and sense of construction. The work explores themes of nostalgia, elegance, and melancholy, while remaining rooted in a resolutely French aesthetic .

History

The story of Maurice Ravel’s Valses nobles et sentimentales is as fascinating as the music itself . It is a work that had a singular genesis and an initial reception that was, to say the least, turbulent .

In 1911, Ravel completed this suite of eight piano waltzes, which he dedicated to his friend Louis Aubert. The title is a direct homage to Franz Schubert and his own waltz collections, but Ravel brings his modern touch to it, seeking to create a “chain of waltzes” in which harmony and form are crystallized and the musical contours sharpened . He wanted to explore new avenues, moving away from the flamboyant virtuosity of his previous masterpiece , Gaspard de la nuit. He even included as an epigraph a quote from the symbolist poet Henri de Régnier: “the delicious and ever-new pleasure of a useless occupation . ”

The first performance took place in a very unusual setting . Organized by the Société Musicale Ind épendante at the Salle Gaveau, it was an “anonymous concert.” The works of the various composers were performed without their names being revealed , inviting the audience and critics to guess the author. For Ravel, the result was a shock. The work, whose writing was deemed too bold and modern for the time, was greeted with boos and jeers. Most of the audience, including his most ardent admirers, did not recognize his influence and attributed it to other composers such as Erik Satie or Charles Koechlin. Ravel himself would later recount the bitter irony of the situation, where his own defenders denigrated the work, believing they were pleasing him. It was only after the composer was revealed that opinion began to change.

The following year, in 1912, the work was given a second life. The dancer Natacha Trouhanova asked Ravel to make an orchestral version for a ballet. This is how Adélaïde or the Language of Flowers was born , a ballet that tells a love story in the context of the Restoration. Ravel’s orchestration, with its great finesse and richness of timbre, gave a new dimension to the music. This orchestral version contributed to the acceptance and appreciation of the work, which finally found its audience. The Valse nobles et sentimentales has become a staple of Ravel’s repertoire, a perfect example of his genius for marrying the elegance of tradition with the audacity of modernity .

Characteristics of Music

Maurice Ravel’s Valses nobles et sentimentales is a work for solo piano distinguished by a unique combination of respect for tradition and bold innovation. Ravel, with explicit reference to Schubert , appropriates the waltz genre and infuses it with his own musical language, characterized by complex harmony and an innovative treatment of rhythm.

Harmony and Tone 🎼

Ravel uses harmonies that may seem dissonant at first, but are in fact the result of very precise and refined writing . He employs enriched chords, ninths and elevenths , and chromatic progressions that blur the boundaries between keys. Although each waltz maintains a basic key, the rapid modulations and “false notes” create a sense of fluidity and surprise. The work is often perceived as a mixture of Impressionism and Modernism.

Rhythm and Structure 🕰 ️

work, consisting of eight waltzes and an epilogue, follows a cyclical structure. Each waltz has its own character , ranging from melancholic lyricism to almost mechanical liveliness , but they are all linked by recurring thematic motifs, particularly in the epilogue where Ravel revisits and superimposes themes from the preceding waltzes . The traditional triple -time waltz rhythm is often distorted by syncopations, offbeat accents , and polyrhythmic passages, giving the music a feel that is both familiar and unsettling. This manipulation of rhythm, combined with harmony , creates a deliberate ambiguity that is a hallmark of Ravel ‘s fabse.

Style(s), movement(s) and period of composition

Maurice Ravel’s Valses nobles et sentimentales are a pivotal work that embodies the musical style of the modern period, at the beginning of the 20th century . 🎶 Composed in 1911, this piece stands at a meeting point between post-romanticism, neoclassicism and impressionism, while being profoundly innovative.

A Renewal of Tradition

In his time, the music of Valses nobles et sentimentales was considered new and innovative, far from simply a classical or romantic work. Ravel pays homage to tradition by drawing inspiration from the title of Franz Schubert’s waltzes, but he subverts his audience’s expectations. Instead of gentle, lyrical waltzes, he offers a series of fragmented, harmonically complex dances.

The work defies simple categorization. Although it shares elements with the Impressionist movement of the time, notably in its use of rich timbres and delicate textures (especially in its orchestrated version), Ravel himself distances himself from this label. He is more of a neoclassicist in his clarity of structure and formal precision, while being a modernist in his bold harmonic language. Ravel hardens the harmonies and uses subtle dissonances, layering of tones, and syncopated rhythms that break with the conventions of the traditional Viennese waltz. This ambivalence is also the reason why, at its first ” anonymous” performance in 1911, the work was received with disdain and the audience failed to recognize Ravel’s influence. 😲

Between Nationalism and Universalism

Ravel’s work is not nationalist in the sense of a political claim, but it is typically French in its elegance , its conciseness and its search for clarity . Rather than confining itself to a single style, it borrows and fuses elements from different schools , creating a music that is both universal and unique. It is a work that celebrates dance while deconstructing it, that honors the past while projecting itself resolutely towards the musical future of the 20th century .

Analysis: Form, Technique(s), Texture, Harmony, Rhythm

reinvents the waltz form. Analysis of this piece reveals a technical mastery that combines classical tradition with modernist innovations, creating a rich texture and complex harmony .

Texture and Shape

The texture of the work is primarily polyphonic, although it incorporates moments of monophony and homophonic writing. Ravel uses a layering of melodic lines and rhythmic motifs, particularly in the epilogue where themes from the preceding waltzes overlap to create a dense and complex soundscape .

The form is that of a dance suite. The work is composed of eight separate waltzes, each with its own character and tempo, but linked by subtle melodic motifs and recurring harmonic devices . The apex of the structure is the epilogue, which acts as a thematic focal point and gives overall coherence to the suite. This cyclical structure is one of Ravel’s favorite techniques.

Harmony and Scale

The harmony of the work is both tonal and modal, and is characterized by the use of subtle dissonances and extended chords (9th , 11th , 13th ) . Ravel does not abandon tonality, but he pushes it to its limits, using chromaticism, notes outside the scale , and progressions that create a sense of tonal ambiguity . The scale used is primarily the diatonic scale, but Ravel adds modal touches, notably by using the Lydian mode in certain sections. The tonality of each waltz is clearly defined at the beginning, but it is often modulated or obscured by the complex harmonic progressions.

Rhythm and Technique

Rhythm is at the heart of the composition. Ravel plays with the traditional 3/4 waltz time signature by introducing syncopations and accents that shift the downbeats, creating a sense of irregularity . Tempos vary from one waltz to the next, from slow and melancholic to fast and whirling. 🎶

In terms of technique, Ravel uses sophisticated piano effects to create orchestral textures. There are passages with arpeggios , broken chords, and extensive use of the sustain pedal to soften harmonies and create resonances . The orchestral version, produced in 1912, demonstrates Ravel’s ability to transpose these piano effects into a rich and colorful orchestration, enhancing the richness and complexity of the work .

Tutorial, performance tips and important playing points

Performing Ravel’s Valses nobles et sentimentales is an exciting challenge. This work requires not only solid technique, but also great interpretative finesse to reveal its full complexity and beauty. Here’s a guide to help you approach it.

General interpretation advice

Clarity and precision: Ravel’s music is the opposite of vagueness. Every note, every rhythm must be played with absolute precision, even in fast and delicate passages. Avoid playing ” by ear”; the work is constructed with mathematical logic.

Control : Ravel uses dynamic contrasts very precisely . The work ranges from almost inaudible pianissimo to powerful fortissimo, often within the space of a few bars. Practice controlling the power of your stroke and varying the colors of your sound .

Pedal : The use of the pedal is crucial. It not only serves to tie notes together, but also to create resonances and diffuse harmonies. However, Ravel is very precise in his pedal indications, and overuse could muddy the subtle harmonies.

Dance Feeling: Despite the harmonic and rhythmic complexity, the work remains a waltz. Maintain the sense of dance movement. The accent is often on the first beat of each measure, but Ravel plays with this rule by often shifting the accent, which gives an impression of elegance and imbalance .

Technical and stylistic points by Valse

Waltz I (Modé r é – very frank )

The character is bold and direct. The “frank” indicates a no-nonsense game.

Work on the precision of the chord on the first beat. The left hand must be firm and the chords well held.

Waltz II (Quite slow – with intense expression)
The contrast with the first waltz is strong . The character is introspective and lyrical.

Focus on controlling legato and cantabile with the right hand. The tempo should remain flexible and expressive.

Waltz III ( Moderate – rather cheerful )

It is a lively and capricious waltz. The playing should be light and playful .

The left hand is particularly important here; it must be light and allow the right hand to dance on the keyboard.

Waltz IV (Quite Lively )

This waltz is more technical and faster. Work on the passages in thirds and the clarity of the sound.

The left hand must be very agile for the arpeggiated passages which give a feeling of perpetual movement .

Waltz V (Almost slow – in an intimate character)

The character is very intimate and melancholic. The harmony is particularly rich and dark.

Use the pedal with great finesse so as not to blur the subtle dissonances that give this waltz its color .

Waltz VI (Lively)

The fastest and most brilliant waltz in the suite. The playing must be virtuoso and energetic.

Work on the rhythm precisely, as there are triplet passages that can easily become indistinct if not controlled .

Waltz VII (Less lively)

The character is that of a noble and majestic waltz. The tempo is more restrained than the previous one .

Focus on sound projection and chord depth. Dynamic contrasts are crucial to bringing out emotion.

Waltz VIII ( Epilogue – Slow)

This is the climax and conclusion of the work. Ravel reviews all the themes from the previous waltzes .

This passage requires great musical maturity. The sound must be very delicate , even ghostly , like fading memories. The interweaving of the themes must be clearly audible, but without one overpowering the other.

In summary , the interpretation of Valses nobles et sentimentales is a balance between expressive freedom and technical and rhythmic rigor. The aim is to convey the elegance and melancholy of the music without ever sacrificing clarity .

Famous Recordings

Maurice Ravel’s Valses nobles et sentimentales is a very popular work in the piano repertoire, which has led to numerous recordings, each reflecting a different approach and aesthetic .

Recordings of the great tradition and history

Vlado Perlemuter (1970s recordings): This is an essential reference . Perlemuter worked directly with Ravel and his interpretation is often considered the most authentic. His playing is of surgical clarity and precision, without ever sacrificing emotion. It highlights the neoclassical structure of the work and the logic of the composition.

Walter Gieseking (1950s recordings): Known for his interpretations of Debussy and Ravel, Gieseking offers a very colorful and impressionistic version . He focuses on timbres and textures, using the pedal to create vaporous atmospheres , while maintaining great fluidity .

Robert Casadesus: This French pianist offers a very elegant and subtle interpretation . His playing is marked by great finesse and clarity of phrasing, in line with the French pianistic tradition .

Reference and standard recordings

Samson François : This French pianist , with his very personal style , brings a touch of virtuosity and panache. His recordings are known for their spontaneity and passionate character , with sometimes faster tempos and risk-taking.

Pascal Rogé: Often considered one of Ravel’s finest interpreters , Pascal Rogé offers a refined and elegant interpretation. He highlights the work’s poetry and harmonic nuances. His recording is often cited as a reference for its sonic beauty and sense of balance .

Jean-Efflam Bavouzet: In his complete series of Ravel’s piano works, Bavouzet brings a modern and very detailed approach . His interpretation is characterized by great technical clarity, meticulous attention to rhythmic details and a very lively interpretation .

Martha Argerich: Her recording is celebrated for its virtuosity and energy. She offers an intense and passionate vision, with very dynamic playing that highlights the strong contrasts in the score.

Modern and contemporary interpretations

Bertrand Chamayou: His complete Ravel works have been highly acclaimed . Chamayou offers an interpretation that is both poetic and analytical, revealing the complex layers of the music. His touch is highly sensitive, and he manages to bring out the modernity of the work .

Seong-Jin Cho: The young Korean pianist, with his recent recording, offers a performance of great technical mastery . His playing is both powerful and precise, with an approach that emphasizes structure and clarity .

Episodes and anecdotes

Maurice Ravel’s Valses nobles et sentimentales is a work rich in history, and several anecdotes shed light on the composer’s life and the reception of his music at the time.

The Anonymous Concert

Perhaps the most famous story surrounding the work is that of its first performance in 1911. Ravel had agreed to have his new composition performed at an “anonymous concert” organized by the Société Musicale Indépendante . The composers’ names were not revealed ; the audience was invited to guess the author of each piece . When the Valses nobles et sentimentales were performed, they were greeted with whistles and boos. The audience, including Ravel’s friends, were shocked by the score’s modernity and bold harmonies, which they described as “shocking” and “shocking.” The audience was outraged, and many attributed the work to other composers such as Erik Satie or Charles Koechlin, but never to Ravel, whom they did not believe capable of such audacity. Once Ravel’s name was revealed , there was a moment of astonishment. The composer was amused by it, later declaring that his friends were “furious that I had booed him . ”

The creation of the ballet Adé la ï de or the language of flowers

A year after its piano premiere, Russian dancer Natasha Trouhanova asked Ravel to orchestrate the waltzes for a ballet. She had in mind to create a dance piece based on the work. The ballet, titled Adélaïde or the Language of Flowers, tells a love story in a garden where each flower symbolizes an emotion. Ravel threw himself into the orchestration with his usual genius, transforming the piano version into an orchestral masterpiece. This adaptation was a second life for the work, which this time was acclaimed by critics and the public. The orchestration revealed the colors and nuances that were already present in the piano version, and helped the public accept Ravel ‘s musical language.

The influence of Franz Schubert

The very title of the waltzes is an anecdote in itself. By naming his work Valses nobles et sentimentales, Ravel was paying direct and admiring homage to the Austrian composer Franz Schubert, who himself had composed waltz cycles with similar titles. It was a way for Ravel to situate himself within the great classical tradition, while asserting his own modernity. It was a statement of intent: to take a classical form and rethink it in a radically new way , incorporating his own harmonies and vision. This dialogue between tradition and innovation is a constant in Ravel’s work, and these waltzes are a perfect example.

Similar compositions

To place Ravel’s Valses nobles et sentimentales in a broader musical context, several works can be cited that share similar characteristics, whether in form, genre, or stylistic approach.

Works by Ravel himself

La Valse (1919-1920): This is the most obvious composition to mention . Although later, it explores the same genre of the waltz, but in a much more dramatic and chaotic manner . If the Valses nobles are a “suite of waltzes”, La Valse is an “apotheosis of the waltz” that degenerates into destruction . The harmonic and rhythmic writing is even more complex and virtuoso.

Miroirs (1905): This suite for solo piano shares Ravel ‘s harmonic language and impressionistic approach, particularly in its sound textures and use of color. Pieces such as Une barque sur l’océan or La vallée des cloches can recall the mood of the Valses nobles.

Works of his contemporaries

Claude Debussy

Images (1905, 1907): Debussy, like Ravel, sought to create sonic tableaux, using unconventional harmonies and orchestral timbres on the piano. The approach is similar, although Debussy’s music is often perceived as more subjective and less structurally rigid than Ravel’s.

Children’s Corner (1908): Although the subject matter is lighter, this suite by Debussy shares the humor, elegance and clarity of writing that characterize Ravel.

Erik Satie

Sarabandes (1887) or Gymnopédies (1888): Satie, with his minimalist approach and modal harmonies, influenced Ravel. We find in both composers a desire to break with romantic language while retaining a certain poetry .

Works by Romantic and Post-Romantic Composers

Franz Schubert

Valses nobles, D. 969 and Valses sentimentales, D. 779: As Ravel’s title suggests, these works are the direct model . Ravel took Schubert’s waltz genre and modernized it, transforming the innocence and simplicity of the original into harmonic complexity and sophistication.

Frédéric Chopin​​​

Waltzes: Chopin’s waltzes are often cited for their elegance , lyricism, and virtuosity. However, Chopin’s approach remains within the Romantic framework, while Ravel, while inspired by Chopin’s elegance , breaks with his harmonic language.

Robert Schumann

Carnival, Op. 9: This cycle of small piano pieces shares the same idea of creating a collection of distinct impressions and characters , even if Schumann’s narrative context is more explicit.

In short, compositions similar to Ravel are those that explore the form of the piano suite, the waltz genre, and the harmonic language of the early 20th century , while seeking to transcend the conventions of the past .

(This article was generated by Gemini. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify