Note | Structuralism

What is structuralism

Structuralism is a school of thought adopts a way of scientific method extracts social and human unconscious structure(s), is based on Saussurean linguistics or semiology. The concept of “structure” means a system composed of relations of things or elements. And structure is not only a set of plurality and unity, but also a whole can’t be separated and described as a system, relations and elements in a total relationship. There’s mutual effects among system, relations and elements. Structure obtains a characteristics through a process of changes. But exact concept of structure is various by authors. And structuralism has no proper manifesto and group.

This school and its movement swept over France and Europe in the 1960’s, still huge influence on humane studies and social science. The argument of structuralism led to be a criticism to rationalism, humanism and progressivism, Marxism and Sartre’s Existentialism. The viewpoint of structuralism still affects people in contemporary society.

A origin: Saussurean linguistic & semiology

A Swiss linguist, Ferdinand de Saussure create the general linguistic and semiology. These impact entirely changed the view point and the method of linguistic study.

Before de Sassure, linguists, especially comparative linguistics solely studied comparative and historical study of language. They compared and unraveled changes before and after of a language, differences among languages by phonology, syntax, lexicology and so on. And their ultimate aim is pursued the root and the entire history of the Indo-European language.

Also de Saussure is a great genius in comparative linguistics. But he felt he can’t grasp the truth of language and the true mechanism, mean and value of language forever by the study. So he was completely exhausted these endless study, and in a depressive state for a while. So he planned a study deals with general and universal system of language and human expression, as the general linguistic or semiology.

In “Course in General Linguistics” de Saussure pursued the general system of language, communication, and effects of meaning. This study brought about the school of structural linguistics. And he planned semiology, the general study of sign, precedes linguistics which got to be a major root of structuralism.

Levi-Strauss

Anthropologist, Claude Levi-Strauss applied linguistics of de Saussure and Roman Jakobson to analysis of structures of kinship or mythes in primitive societies, he proved a society composed by unconscious structures than subjective human will and decision. The rules in a structure of a society is an unconscious thing for the members of the society, so function of social structure has more important significance than subjective decision and intention of the world history.

Then Levi-Strauss showed a doubt for the idea of subjective decision by human of existentialism. He said human studies and social science should study the social structure that permits each men’s subjective decisions, the concept of a man as a subject must be resolved.

Roland Barthes

“Écrivain”, Roland Barthes rediscovered the Saussurean semiology, earnestly forwarded and applied it for analyses of literature, culture and the contemporary society. The aim of Barthes is solve the structure behind senses of which human, culture and nature form. Behind human expression and behaviour in a culture or society, there’s a certain invisible function or system.

In an essay “The Death of the Author” Barthes presented the concept of the death of the author, and criticize the author-centralism and the concept of “(grand) work” of classical literary criticism. By Barthes, an author is not the god or creator of the work, text should be read as a weaved fabric of various citations in a culture.

Louis Althusser

Philosopher, Louis Althusser re-read works of Karl Marx as a scientific epistemology or a structural relationalism analysis on economics and society.

Althusser thought, Marx’s theory must be structurally analysed, and the concepts such as “aliennation” and “reification” are eliminated by the method of epistemological break. He removed young Marx’s humanism and Hegel’s rationalism from Marx’s master-piece, The Capital.

Futhermore, Althusser made structural analysis the theory of Marx. He argued about “reciprocal effects between a superstructure and a basis”, “reproduction of relations of production”, and “ideological state apparatuses”. Then he proclaimed Marxism faces a crisis by becoming an ideological state apparatuses of the Communist Party.

Conclusion

Structuralism is a school or a method treat unconscious hidden system regulate thinking and acts of men, formed by relations of a relationship in a society or a culture.

I think structuralism is very important and still valid, and the thinking is still effective to analyse and think about a society, social movements, expressions and literature. And it’s an effective and potent way of thinking and a method of research, equal to phenomenology, existentialism, pragmatism and Wittgenstein’s language game, I think.

References

Akira Deguchi, Real Structuralism: Language, Power, Subject (NHK Publishing, 2013)

Graham Allen, Roland Barthes (Routledge, 2003)

Jonathan Culler, Roland Barthes (Oxford University Press, 2002)

Related Posts and Pages

Timeline of Philosophy

Philosophy / Philosophie

Note | A Definition of Philosophy

What is Philosophy ?

The origin of the word philosophy is “philosophia” of Greek, love or collection of wisdom or knowledge. The definitions of philosophy by André Comte-Sponville is “a (discursif, reasonable and conceptional) theoretical practice”. And the definition of philosopher by Roger-Pol Droit is a specialist of ideas (or concepts) and a friend of knowledge-wisdom.

Philosophy is a way of thinking by concepts and principles for a fundamental comprehensive account of the world. Subjects of the account are (what are) being, human, self, others, life, knowledge, perception, time, virtue, happiness, reality, society, world, universe, to live good and so on.

Philosophy forms or let you have a view to the world and the life. Because it is a fundamental account of the world. So philosophy become a criterion of how to think and how to live good.

Philosophy is a “language game” aims for the universality and mutual general understanding. Philosophy itself and its principles is not absolute and true. Philosophy can be remade to be better one.

Different to Religion

Religion is also a comprehensive account of the world. But religion teaches believers the origin of world, the meaning of life and moral by a story. And a most important thing of religion is believers believe a story of a prophet or a founder, and believe there’s a truth in its story. Religion gives us truth, and salvation, peace mind and the meaning of life by truth, so it’s an indispensable thing for human.

Religion pursuits a truth, but philosophy pursuits a universality. And essences, methods or worths of philosophy and religion are not same. They are in different aspects or spheres. So they are comparative each other. And we can hold both philosophy and religion.

Philosophy is a Process

Philosophy always begin from nothing, root or ignorance, on the other hand it should follow philosophical tradition, problems and themes. New philosophies have appeared as a critical following or a critical turn. Almost philosophers refine their philosophy for their entire career by their own further researches, and arguments and criticisms by others. Philosophy isn’t a truth or a fact. It’s a changeable principle is refined and replaced by better one(s). Because aim of philosophy is to grasp a universality and mutual understanding. So philosophy is an endless process of thinking.

And the history of philosophy is a succession of conflicts between monism and dualism or pluralism, absolutism and relativism, realism and idealism, subjectivism and objectivism, rationalism and anti-philosophy.

Different to Science

Once, Philosophy includes today’s natural science, engineering and social science. The past philosophy is a total science to know principle of the nature and the world. Modern philosophy and modern science are divided, and the feature of modern science is pursuit physical and material facts unlimitedly. Science grasps and describes facts as they are.

But science doesn’t give us principal value of the life. Different to science, philosophy inquires “why and how the facts exit”. Philosophy treats value and meaning of facts include scientific facts. A role and a significance of philosophy is principal value and ethical judgement by thinking about facts. Science can’t reply to questions like “How it should be ?” and “How I live ?”.

On the other hand, the progress of science influences our view to the world and philosophy. Also philosophy of science inquires into the basis and the meaning of science.

Conclusion

  1. Philosophy is a way of thinking by concepts and principles for a fundamental comprehensive account of the world.
  2. Its principle always begin from nothing or ignorance. Philosopher must think by himself, but his thinking should be in the philosophical tradition, themes or problems.
  3. Philosophy is not absolute and true, is a variable process of thinking. Its aim is a universality and mutual understanding of the world.
  4. Philosophy tells how to think and how to live good. So philosophy is a criteria of our thinking, act and life, and give us a key to a the meaning and value of our life.

But philosophy has no fixed definition. Continue to think about what is philosophy or definition of philosophy is also an important element of philosophy.

And some thinkers or philosophers (such as Pyrrho, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Deleuze and Derrida) said like “there’s no universal view to the world”, “The philosophical tradition is a fiction.” and “There isn’t a good life and the meaning of life of the world”. These skepticism, pessimism and unti-philosophy are also a philosophy as well.

References

André Comte-Sponville, La philosophie (Presses Universitaires de France, 2012)

Roger-Pol Droit, La philosophie expliquée à ma fille (Édition du Seuil, 2004)

Seiji Takeda, What is Philosophy: To Know Yourself and Society (Iwanami Books, 2002)

Seiji Takeda, A Super Introduction to Philosophy from Age 14 (Chikuma Books, 2009)

Related Posts and Pages

Philosophy of Socrates

Philosophy of René Descartes

Plato’s Theory of Ideas

A Definition of Ethics

Timeline of Philosophy

Philosophy / Philosophie

Note | Horned Owl Spreads Its Wings Only With the Falling of the Dusk (Haruki Murakami A Long, Long Interview) by Haruki Murakami & Mieko Kawakami, Shinchosha, 2017

Information of the Book

Outline and Style

Key Elements

magic touch: Kind of a reality in literature or of writings created by reconstruction of some elements and stories through a mind of an author. (1)

translation: (1. )

voice: écriture of writings. (1)

first person pronoun

 two-story basement (2)

‘caving’ (2)

bat

good stories, bad stories (2)

Summaries, Keywords and Memoirs

Introduction (Mieko Kawakami)

Motoyuki Shibata; Novelist as a Proffestion; Mitsuo Aida; well; magic touch; now and here; owl of Minerva

1 Great Percussionists Don’t Clap The Most Important Note

Kobe; earthquake; Blind Willow, Sleeping Women; New Zealand

Novelist as a Profession; translation; Is Novelists Friendly Persons?; outsider; professional ethics; common sense

‘Metaphor is a difference to visualize mean’. cabinet; James Joyce; successes of accidents; 1Q84; Aomame; Mugiatama; metaphor; Raymond Chandler; A Wild Sheep Chase; sheep man

first person pronoun;third person pronoun; novelette; long novel; boku; J. D. Salinger; The Catcher in the Rye; Kafka on the Shore; the Great Gatzby; factor of I-Novel

story and self; Flaubert; Madame Bobary; unusual; political correctness; women; ‘piles of hypothesis’

A true reality is beyond realities. To write only reality don’t become a true reality. It must have gaps or differences. It’s fiction. It’s a vividly paraphrased reality. readers; internal reading; ‘penetrating a wall’; Wind-up Bird Chronicle; World End and Hard-boiled Wonderland; Men without Women; Doctor Tokai

Murakami don’t like conflicts among egos in daily life by Japanese I-Novel novelists. He is interested in to seek a proper story in his mind, and bring it out, then look at the things built by it. It’s a problem of ‘voice’. The voice intensified by unconsciousness, has deep overtones or harmonics. To make story said by Murakami is processes go though materials through unconsciousness. ego (self); ordinary conflict of ego; voice (tone); Alfred Birnbaum; Jay Rubin; Phillip Gabriel; Ted Goossen; Underground; reconstruction; ‘magic touch’; technique; rhythm

Murakami create the voice of a novel resonates the voice of readers by rewriting many many times. taste of something; rhythm of writing; rewiting; sound; reaction; spontaneity; concentration; music; jazz; free improvisation; classical music; over there

Hear the Wind SIng; Pinball, 1973; reading books; wonder (suprise); candar (frankness); person suitable for become famous; Norwegian Nood; usual man

Buraiha (Decadent School); Shinjuku Golden Street; Kenji Nakagami; Ryu Murakami; Jyunnosuke Yoshiyuki; Ginza; John Coltrane; literature clan; themeism; pure literature; Nakamuraya

insane; adrenaline; Raymond Carver

Murakami took a way of ‘detouchment’ by his anger to the consummation of words by the New Left Wing activists. nuclear power station; social affairs; observation; detouchment; deep commitment; consummation of words; social statements; idealism; analysis; explanation

Kurt Vonnegut; Richard Brautigan; Waseda University; Syouyou Tsubouchi Award; only child; deepness of commitment

Yoshinobu Araki; The New York Times Magazine; Seiji Ozawa; jazz club; Aoyama; Humphrey Bogard

2. Matter in a Two-Story Basement

Killing Commendatore; Mozart; title; Colorless Tsukuba Tazaki and His Years of Pilgrimage; wonder; incompatibility; Akinari Ueda; Spring Rain Stories; starting points; waiting time; Raymond Chandler; Philip Marlowe; boku; watashi; moving

To write novel is to fight for something. The concept of ‘evil’ in Murakami’s novels had changed. His disappointment for the student movement in 1968 to 1969 reached a distrust for superficial words and expressions and a kind of escape to society as ‘Hear the Wind Sing’. Now he think to fight for evil in the vast information society he needs to touch the evil inside himself. evil; Little People; tatal evil; repose of souls; fight for something; 1968 or 1969; Tokyo Subway sarin attack; Aum Shinrikyo

All of events in the world seems to be reciprocally robbing of ‘our (collective) unconsciousness’ by stories. differenciation; modern ego; two-story basement; self-help; Donald Trump; Hilary Clinton; Twitter; good story ; multilayered story; bad story; easy story; Hayao Kawai; Nazi Germany; shadow in a mind

Murakami thinks making good stories has value but it’s rare. The distinction between ‘good stories’ or ‘bad stories’ is a role of time. ‘Bad stories’ can’t deceive a lot of people for a long time. ancient space; the Place of Haruki Murakami; ‘caving’; way of telling story; écriture; trust; familiarity; ‘caving style’; Adolf Hitler; Shoukoh Asahara; game; programming; Glenn Gould; separation

  • Wittgenstein’s language game

bat; Crete Kanou; Chehofu; dramatrugie;themeism; myth (mythology); the Bible; Greek Mythology; Takamura Onono; Magic Realism; awakening; realism style; artist type; ‘literary retreat’; Dance, Dance, Dance

no plan; interpretation; totality (whole of something)

power of (the) place; transcendental being; drawer(s); cabinet

matapher; Drive My Car; ordinary, free and neutral man; plot-in-person; Marcel Proust

credit transaction; to attach time to my side; Salinger; the Catcher int the Rye; John Lennon; Mark Chapman; risk (danger); Abbie Hoffman;

Murakami doesn’t have an interest to describe modern ego in the ‘first basement’. The act was exhausted by novelists and he think it is ineffective for current novelists. Junnosuke Yoshiyuki; Nobuo Kohima; Syotaro Yasuoka; Jyunzo Shouno; pressure; ego; self; The Third Generation Postwar Writers; Kurt Vonnegut; Richard Brautigan; In Watermelon Sugar; modern ego

‘be-involved in style’; neutral being; strange stories; upright stories; attitude for receiving; Franz Kafka; The Castle; The Trial; The Metamorphosis; Charles Dickens; Oliver Twist; Sean Connery; James Bond; hypothesis past; hypothesis being; Miss Mumiyoshi; jealousy

Mr Menshiki; the man without face; the man of white Subaru Forester; alter ego; inexplainable character; generator; Cinnamon Akasaka; 70%

Platon; idea; evil idea; matapohr; platonism; Carl Gustav Jung; image of letters; sound of words; Marvin Gay; Ain’t Nothing Like the Real Thing

like shrine maiden (sorceress); medium; power receives something; spiritualist; spontenous; divination

character; feeling of solidity; Sohseki Natsume; Jack London; Martin Eden; positiveness; positive ending; happy end; Joseph Conrad; Lord Jim; catharsis; prologue; post-history; To draw oil painting and to write novel are same as to create work, although just technical points are different. So Murakami can write processes of oil painting only by his imagination in Killing Commendatore. exchange

motif; well; to get back things I lost; act of cure; alternative self; another possibility

3. Night I Can’t Sleep is Rare, The Same as a Fat Postman

Great Gatsby; Jay Gatsby; tranlation; Long Goodbye; Jorge Borges; self-imitating; rhythm; sound (echo); Sputnik, Sweetheart; casual sentences use many mataphors

écriture; Norwegian Wood; a little longer novel; experiment; detail; paraphrase; Movie is total art, there are actors, a director, a playwright, cameras and a budget. But as for novel, Murakami can write it only by himself from beginning to the end. It’s the greatest pleasure for him. You can write novel anyway by a desk, papers and pens only. He can write anything he want and can be responsible for everything of a novel, he love this characteristic of novel. movie (cinema); Beruf

Haida; Terry Lennox; male principle; Grace Paley; prehistory;posthistory; age 54; reality; childhood; the man of white Subaru Forester; There are things can’t be explained in a novel. They can be explained as a novel but can’t be explained as a meaning in analysis (by literary critics). But novelist have to accomplish to write them. intuition (instinct); accuracy of text; ‘To know oneself’ for novelist is the experiences of to brush up text itself. Gorky; The Lower Depth; drama; metapher; Anyway I don’t write a text readers may skip over easily. Orson Wells; Citizen Kane

Kenji Nakagami; Ryu Murakami; écriture (literary style); translation style; I can’t teach how to live, the same, it’s difficult to teach how to write. Soseki Natsume; Kokoro

Naoya Shiga; Junichiro Tanizaki; Yasunari Kawabata; Junnosuke Yoshiyuki; Saiichi Maruya; ’Style is an index of the mind.; index; J. D. Salinger; The Catcher in the Rye; Franny and Zooey; style consiouss; Fitzgerald; Dostoïevslki; structure

female characters; Shoko Akikawa; Marie Akikawa; May Kasahara; Carson McCullers; the Members of the Wedding

obsession; sexual element; reflective element; differenciation; interface; Murakami thinks he doesn’t write the inside of characters deeply, but he write connections to the world (interface) of characters. feminism; Women have the function differ to men’s. So, in Murakami’s novels, women lead a narrative to a different place.

TV People; Sleeping; Anna Karénine; Wataru Menshiki; Shoko Akikawa; Tony Takitani

The Andersen Award; analysis; Murakami don’t like ‘analysis’. The consequence is incorrect when a factor were changed. It’s important to accept facts or stories as they are. Joseph Conrad; shadow

4. If There Were No Papers, But People Would Talk Over

(…)

After the Interviews

(…)

Product Details

Horned Owl Spreads Its Wings Only With the Falling of the Dusk (Haruki Murakami A Long, Long Interview)

Haruki Murakami & Mieko Kawakami

Shinchosha, Tokyo, 27 April 2017

345 pages, JPY 1620

ISBN 978-4103534341
Contents:

  • Introduction (Mieko Kawakami)
  • 1 Great Percussionists Don’t Clap The Most Important Note
  • 2 Matter in a Two-Story Basement
  • 3 Night I Can’t Sleep is Rare, The Same as a Fat Postman
  • 4 Without Papers, Men Will Hand Down
  • After the Interviews (Haruki Murakami)

Related Posts and Pages

Summary | Novelist as a Profession

Note (EN) | Horned Owl Spreads Its Wings Only With the Falling of the Dusk (Haruki Murakami A Long, Long Interview) with Mieko Kawakami

Note (EN) | Hear the Wind Sing

Note (EN) | Pinball, 1973

Note (EN) | A Wild Sheep Chase

Book Review | Killing Commendatore

Note (EN) | Killing Commendatore, Book 1

Note (EN) | Killing Commendatore, Book 2

Timeline of Haruki Murakami

Keywords of Haruki Murakami

Works of Haruki Murakami

Literature / littérature / Literatur Page

YouTube Haruki Murakami Commentary Playlist

YouTube Literature & Philosophy Channel