Notes on À la manière de Chabrier, M. 63/2 by Maurice Ravel, Information, Analysis and Performance Tutorial

Overview

​​

“In the Manner of Chabrier, M. 63/2 ” is a piano piece by Maurice Ravel, part of a diptych of pastiches with “In the Manner of Borodin, M. 63/1 ” . Composed in 1912-1913 and published in 1914, this work is a tribute to and imitation of the musical style of Emmanuel Chabrier, a composer whom Ravel deeply admired .

Main features :

Pastiche and Paraphrase: The piece is a “paraphrase on an air by Gounod ” , imitating the energetic, clear and rhythmic style of Chabrier. It is in fact a paraphrase of Sié bel’s romance, “Fais-lui mes aveux ” , from the second act of Charles Gounod’s opera Faust. Ravel enjoys imitating a Chabrier who, himself , would have pastiched Gounod.

Contrast: The piece contrasts sharply with the first of the diptych, “In the Manner of Borodin ” , which is more lyrical and poetic. This contrast highlights Ravel ‘s talent for appropriating very different musical styles while putting his own signature on them.

Character : The piece is marked by its lively, rhythmic and elegant character , typical of Chabrier ‘s style.

Duration : The work is a short piece , lasting approximately two minutes.

Catalogue reference: The piece bears the number M. 63/2 in the catalogue of Ravel’s works established by the musicologist Marcel Marnat.

In short, “À la maniere de Chabrier ” is an ingenious work that demonstrates Ravel’s admiration for his predecessors and his skill in imitating their musical language, while retaining the modernity and finesse of his own style.

History

The story of the composition of “À la maniere de Chabrier ” is part of a context of musical tributes and stylistic games which were very fashionable in Ravel ‘s time.

It all began around 1912-1913, when Ravel began writing two piano pieces that would eventually be published together under the title À la maniere de … . The idea came to him to compose pastiches, that is , respectful imitations of the style of other composers he admired. This practice, common in literature and art, was a way for Ravel to pay homage to his elders and explore their musical language.

For the first piece , he chose to parody the style of Alexander Borodin, one of the composers of the Russian “Group of Five . ” For the second, he chose Emmanuel Chabrier, a figure he particularly venerated . Ravel had a deep admiration for Chabrier’s The King in Spite of Himself, to the point of declaring that he would have ” preferred to have done The King in Spite of Himself than Wagner’s Tetralogy . ”

But Ravel does not simply imitate Chabrier’s style . He goes further, creating a pastiche upon a pastiche. The piece is subtitled ” Paraphrase on an Air of Gounod , ” referring to Siébel ‘s romance , ” Fais-lui mes aveux , ” from the second act of Charles Gounod’s opera Faust. Ravel then amuses himself by imagining how Chabrier, with his exuberant, energetic style and bold harmonies, might have appropriated and transformed this Gounod melody. The result is a piece full of life and spirit, in which we find Chabrier’s characteristic features, such as his full pianistic textures and clear melodic lines, filtered through the refinement and elegance of Ravel’s own language.

The diptych was premiered publicly on December 10, 1913, at the Salle Pleyel in Paris, by the pianist Alfredo Casella. This double homage, to both Borodin and Chabrier, demonstrated Ravel’s ability to appropriate very different musical styles with disconcerting ease , while imprinting his unique personality as a composer.

Characteristics of Music

“In the Manner of Chabrier ” is a true study in style, in which Ravel appropriates and affectionately caricatures the distinctive features of Emmanuel Chabrier’s musical language. The main musical characteristics of this composition are as follows:

An incisive and energetic rhythm: The piece , marked ” Allegretto ” , is animated by a lively and percussive rhythm. We find the energy and clarity that are Chabrier’s trademarks, notably his syncopated rhythms and sharp accents. The writing for the piano is very ” percussive ” , with chords and octaves that give the music a constant momentum.

Shimmering and bold harmonies: Ravel, faithful to the spirit of Chabrier, uses rich and colorful harmonies. We find unexpected chord progressions , delicious dissonances and expressive chromaticisms. The pastiche does not simply reproduce the sonorities, it pushes them to the extreme , as if Ravel were having fun playing with the harmonic ” touch” of his elder .

A full and generous piano writing : Unlike some of Ravel’s pieces which explore a more ethereal and delicate writing , ” À la maniere de Chabrier ” is characterized by a generous use of the keyboard. The chords are often played with both hands, creating a dense and powerful sonic texture. This sonic fullness is another distinctive feature of Chabrier’s style.

Melodic clarity : Although the texture is rich, the melody always remains clearly audible. Ravel manages to preserve Gounod’s melodic line (“Fais-lui mes aveux ” from Faust) while drowning it in complex, chromatic piano writing. This is the heart of the pastiche exercise: to show how a Chabrier would have “transformed” a simple, romantic melody into a piece full of vitality and spirit.

The stylistic contrast: The piece , lasting about two minutes, is very contrasted with its sister piece, “In the Manner of Borodin ” . While the former is more lyrical, poetic and melancholic, the one dedicated to Chabrier is exuberant, lively and full of humor. This opposition highlights Ravel’s virtuosity , capable of embodying diametrically opposed musical aesthetics with the same ease .

In short, Ravel does not simply quote an aria; he reproduces its spirit by absorbing Chabrier’s musical characteristics. He creates a work that is both a faithful imitation and a personal reinterpretation , thus demonstrating his mastery of musical language and his admiration for the composer.

Style(s), movement(s) and period of composition

“À la maniere de Chabrier ” is a composition that stands at a stylistic crossroads, and analyzing it requires considering several facets. Although it is often associated with Impressionism due to the period of its composition (early 20th century ) and its author, it is more precisely an example of Neoclassicism tinged with Modernism. It is both a traditional homage and an innovative work.

Style and Period

Maurice Ravel, one of the masters of early 20th-century French music , is often categorized as an Impressionist, alongside Claude Debussy. This movement is characterized by a particular attention to sonority , timbre, and harmony , creating moods rather than clear forms. This is reflected in Ravel’s piano writing, which is very colorful and evocative . However, Ravel himself preferred to be considered a classicist or neoclassicist, as he placed primary importance on form , structure , and clarity .

Composed in 1912-1913, “À la maniere de Chabrier ” is a perfect example of this neoclassicism. Ravel does not just make “impressionist ” music; he refers to a 19th -century composer , Emmanuel Chabrier, and even borrows a theme from another composer of the same period , Charles Gounod, to reinterpret it with his own modern signature.

Ancient or Innovative?

The music of “À la maniere de Chabrier ” is paradoxically both old and new.

Ancient/Traditional: The piece is a pastiche, that is , a respectful imitation of a bygone style. Ravel immerses himself in the musical language of Chabrier, with its frank rhythms and bold harmonies, but still rooted in post-romanticism and French nationalism . He appropriates a melody by Gounod, a typically romantic composer. As a result, it sounds like a journey through musical time, a nod to a bygone era .

New/Innovative: Despite this traditional aspect, the work is fundamentally modernist in its approach. Ravel uses harmonic and pianistic techniques that are specific to the early 20th century . Pastiche is not a simple copy, but a reinvention. Ravel takes Chabrier’s style and filters it through his own writing, with its clarity , precision , and sophistication, creating a work that is resolutely of its time. It is this critical distance and mastery that make it innovative, even if it is adorned with the trappings of tradition.

In conclusion, the music of “À la maniere de Chabrier ” cannot be pigeonholed . It demonstrates the complexity of Ravel’s style, which draws on his predecessors while remaining a profoundly original composer of his time.

Analysis: Form, Technique(s), Texture, Harmony, Rhythm

Maurice Ravel’s “À la maniere de Chabrier ” is a piano piece which, despite its brevity , presents a rich musical analysis, faithful to the spirit of the composer it honors.

Musical analysis

Method and Technique

The main method of composition is pastiche, that is , a respectful imitation of another composer’s style. Ravel uses this technique to recreate Chabrier’s aesthetic, characterized by dense piano writing and rhythmic energy. The writing technique is also that of paraphrase, with Ravel taking an existing theme ( the romance “Fais-lui mes aveux ” from Gounod’s opera Faust) and transforming it according to Chabrier’s ” manner .”

Texture and Shape

The texture of the piece is predominantly polyphonic or, more precisely , homophonic with rich harmonic figuration. Although Gounod’s melody is always present, it is supported by a very busy piano writing , with full chords, octaves and arpeggios which give the music a characteristic density and fullness of sound . The texture is never monophonic; the accompaniment is always present .

The form is that of a character piece , which does not adhere to a strict structure like the sonata or the rondo. It develops in a fluid manner , following the main theme and its variations. It can be broken down into a simple binary or ternary form (ABA’ or ABC):

Part A: Introduction to Gounod’s theme, presented in the style of Chabrier.

Part B: Development with new melodic and harmonic ideas, while maintaining the initial momentum.

Part A’ or Coda: Return of the main theme , often transformed or enriched, leading to a rapid conclusion.

Harmony, Scale and Tonality

The harmony of the piece is tonal, but with chromatic enrichments that give it a modern color. Ravel uses seventh and ninth chords , as well as bold sequences that evoke the audacity of Chabrier.

The main key is D major, but it constantly sails into distant regions, creating a sense of tonal floating typical of early 20th- century works.

The scale used is the diatonic scale of D major, but the use of chromatic notes and frequent accidentals considerably enriches the musical language and blurs the harmonic lines.

Pace

The rhythm is one of the most important features of the piece . It is lively, incisive, and percussive, with a tempo marked ” Allegretto .” Ravel uses numerous syncopations and accents to recreate Chabrier’s rhythmic dynamism. The constant use of energetic accompanying movement in the left hand reinforces this sense of rhythmic liveliness.

Tutorial, performance tips and important playing points

To perform Maurice Ravel’s “À la manè re de Chabrier ” on the piano , it is essential to understand the spirit of the work and master the technical challenges it presents. Here is a tutorial, tips, and important points for playing this piece successfully .

1. Understand the spirit of the work

Before touching the piano, soak up the character of the piece . Remember that this is a pastiche, an affectionate imitation of the style of Emmanuel Chabrier. His style is lively, spirited, sometimes a little heavy, with a very present rhythmic energy . Ravel, with his own sensitivity, brings a touch of refinement and clarity .

Performance tip: Don’t aim for a delicate, ethereal sound like Debussy . You need strength, energy, and a certain sonic generosity . Imagine Chabrier having fun, laughing, and making the notes dance. Humor and wit should be palpable in your playing.

2. Important technical points

This piece is an excellent exercise in polyphonic clarity and rhythmic precision.

Rhythm: The tempo is marked ” Allegretto ,” which is moderate , but it should not be slow. The rhythm should be percussive and precise. Pay attention to the many syncopations that give the piece its character . They should be clear and not sag. Work on complex rhythms slowly, with a metronome if necessary.

Chords: The writing is very rich in chords, often played with both hands. To achieve a homogeneous sound , it is crucial to master the sound balance. The left hand, although playing the accompaniment, must not overwhelm the right hand. The harmony must be clear and the chords must be played together, without rolling.

Melody : Although the work is dense, Gounod’s melody must always remain audible. It is the soul of the piece . Make sure the upper notes of the right hand sing, while controlling the volume of the other voices. The technique of controlling the weight of the fingers is essential here.

3. Tips for practicing the piano

Work in sections: Don’t tackle the entire room at once. Separate it into small sections and master them one by one.

Slowness and precision: At first, work very slowly . Focus on the clarity of each note, the accuracy of the rhythms, and the placement of your hands. Speed will come naturally with mastery .

Pedal : The sustain pedal is crucial, but use it sparingly. Too much pedal can make the sound muddy, especially with the harmonic richness of the piece . Change the pedal with each harmony change to keep the sound clean and precise .

4. Pitfalls to avoid

Heaviness: It needs to be strong, but not brutal. The sound must remain elegant and controlled , even in loud passages (forte).

Lack of clarity: Ravel’s writing is very precise . Imprecise and disordered playing would take away all meaning from the piece .

Neglecting Character : Never forget the historical and stylistic context. This piece is a tribute. If your interpretation is too serious or too romantic, you will miss out on Ravel’s playful spirit.

In short, to succeed in “À la manè re de Chabrier ” you must combine a solid and precise technique with a keen sense of humor and elegance . It is a character piece that demands both intellectual and musical commitment .

Famous Recordings

Historical and traditional recordings

These recordings, often made by pianists who knew the composer or who come from the same stylistic lineage, are references for the authenticity of the approach.

Vlado Perlemuter: This is an essential reference for the complete piano works of Ravel. Vlado Perlemuter worked with the composer himself . His recording is a precious testimony to the interpretation of the period, with great clarity and fidelity to the musical text. His interpretations are known for their poetry and sense of phrasing, combining the French tradition with a delicacy of touch.

Walter Gieseking: A legendary pianist, Gieseking is famous for his interpretations of Debussy and Ravel. His recording of “À la maniere de Chabrier ” is highly regarded for its crystalline sound and elegance , which highlight the nuances and harmonic details of the piece .

Robert Casadesus: Another great name of the French school , Casadesus left a complete Ravel collection that still stands as a benchmark . His playing is marked by great technical precision and clarity of structure, which perfectly suit the neoclassical character of this work .

Reference and standard recordings

These recordings, although more recent, are considered modern references for their technical quality and depth of interpretation .

Jean-Efflam Bavouzet: His complete works for piano by Ravel, recorded on the MDG label, have been highly acclaimed by critics. His interpretation of “À la maniere de Chabrier ” has been praised for its virtuosity and clarity of execution, while preserving the energy and humor of the piece .

Alexandre Tharaud: Alexandre Tharaud has also recorded a complete Ravel collection that has been very successful . His approach is more lyrical and sensitive, emphasizing color and expressiveness. His interpretation offers a more intimate and poetic perspective on the work .

Angela Hewitt: Renowned for her clarity , precision , and musicality , Angela Hewitt has recorded Ravel ‘s complete piano works for Hyperion Records. Her “À la manère de Chabrier ” is remarkable for its fine touch and limpid harmony, even in the densest passages.

Modern and contemporary interpretations

These more recent recordings bring new perspectives, often with particular attention to sonority , rhythmic momentum or a more personal reading of the score.

Bertrand Chamayou: A leading French pianist, Bertrand Chamayou is known for his lively and colorful approach to the repertoire. His recording of Ravel is very dynamic and powerful, with great attention to the contrasts and energy of the music.

Kun-Woo Paik: Kun-Woo Paik’s recordings are often noted for their power, dramatic intensity, and virtuosity. His interpretation of “À la maniere de Chabrier ” can offer a very powerful and daring reading of the piece .

It is worth noting that many talented pianists have recorded this work, each bringing their own unique vision. Listening to different versions allows one to better appreciate the richness of this short but fascinating composition by Ravel.

Episodes and anecdotes

Despite its short duration , ” À la maniere de Chabrier” is a piece full of anecdotes, because it is set in a context of complex relationships and humor between musicians.

1. The musical bet and the friendship between Ravel and Godebski

The idea for the diptych In the Manner of… was born from a bet or a joke. In 1912, Ravel spent time with his friends Ida and Cipa Godebski, a couple who held a lively artistic salon . It was there that Ravel, urged on by his friends or perhaps in response to a challenge, began composing two musical pastiches. One, “In the Manner of Borodin,” was a response to a request from Cipa Godebski, who admired the Russian composer. The other, “In the Manner of Chabrier,” was the result of his own admiration. It was in this atmosphere of lightness and friendship that these two works were born .

2. Humor and hidden reference

The subtitle of the piece , “Paraphrase on an Air by Gounod,” is in itself a humorous anecdote. Ravel is not content to simply imitate Chabrier. He is imagining how Chabrier would have treated a theme that is completely foreign to him. The theme in question, “Fait-lui mes aveux” from Gounod’s Faust, is a simple and romantic melody. It is by contrasting it with Chabrier’s passion and audacity that Ravel creates the comic contrast. It is a sort of ” pastiche of the pastiche,” a musical mise en abyme that demonstrates Ravel’s brilliant and ironic wit.

3. The Ravel-Chabrier relationship

This was not only for his music, but also for his character . Chabrier’s exuberant temperament, his humor, and his ” generous coarseness ” appealed to Ravel , who, on the surface, was much more reserved . This admiration is reflected in the piece , which captures the composer’s boundless energy and wit without mocking him, but rather paying him an affectionate tribute.

4. Godebski’s little note

Ravel’s friend Cipa Godebski himself left a handwritten note on a version of the score. In it, he explains how the idea for the piece came to him while talking with Ravel and suggesting Gounod’s theme . This note is a testament to the genesis of the work and the friendly collaboration that surrounded its creation .

Ultimately, these anecdotes underline that “À la maniere de Chabrier” is not only a piece of music, but also a capsule of the spirit of the times, of humor between friends, and of admiration between composers, capturing the essence of a relationship that was both intellectual and personal between Ravel and Chabrier.

Similar compositions

Compositions similar to Ravel’s ” À la maniere de Chabrier” can be grouped into several categories: those that share the same composer , the same kind of pastiche, or that evoke the same composer (Chabrier).

1. By the same composer: Maurice Ravel

” In the Manner of Borodin, M. 63/1″: This is the twin and inseparable piece of “In the Manner of Chabrier.” These two works form a diptych in which Ravel, in the same spirit of pastiche, imitates the lyrical and sometimes exuberant style of the Russian composer Alexander Borodin. The contrast between the lyricism and harmonic richness of “Borodin” and the percussive energy of “Chabrier” is one of Ravel’s great achievements.

“Le Tombeau de Couperin” (1914-1917): This suite of six piano pieces is a direct homage to the style of 18th-century French composers , particularly François Couperin . As in pastiches, Ravel uses ancient forms and rhythms (the fugue, the minuet, the forlane) to reinvent them with his own modern harmonic and pianistic language.

2. Pastiches and tributes to other composers

Musical pastiche is a well-established tradition. Many composers have paid homage to their peers or imitated their style.

Alfredo Casella – ” In the Manner of…” (1911): This collection by the Italian composer Alfredo Casella, a contemporary and friend of Ravel, contains pieces in the same spirit of homage. It includes pastiches of works by Wagner, Debussy, Fauré , and even Ravel himself .

Erik Satie – “Les Gnossiennes” and “Gymnopédies”: Although not directly pastiches, these minimalist pieces by Satie influenced Ravel and share with “À la maniere de Chabrier” a certain spirit of experimentation and humor. Satie’s simplicity is an interesting contrast to Ravel’s complexity, but the two composers shared a taste for originality and a rejection of Romantic bombast.

3. Works by Emmanuel Chabrier

To understand the spirit of “À la maniere de Chabrier”, there is nothing better than to look at the works of the master himself .

“Dix Pi è ces pittoresques”: This collection for piano by Chabrier is a direct source of inspiration for Ravel. It features the dense piano writing, the bold harmony and the witty character that Ravel so well imitated .

“Bourrée fantasque”: This piano piece is an excellent example of Chabrier’s energy and rhythmic vivacity. Its percussive character and bold melodic construction echo Ravel’s style in his pastiche.

“España “: This orchestral rhapsody by Chabrier is famous for its exuberance and vivacity. Chabrier ‘s brilliant and colorful treatment of the orchestra, and his ability to evoke atmospheres without conforming to strict forms, profoundly influenced Ravel.

(This article was generated by Gemini. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Jean-Michel Serres Apfel Café Music QR Codes Center English 2024.

Notes on À la manière de Borodine, M.63/1 by Maurice Ravel, Information, Analysis and Performance Tutorial

Overview

​​

“In the Manner of Borodin, M.63/1” is a short piano piece by Maurice Ravel, composed in 1912-1913. It is part of a diptych of humorous pieces or pastiches, the other being “In the Manner of Chabrier”.

is a general overview of this work:

Musical pastiche: As its title suggests, the piece is written ” in the manner of” Borodin, a Russian composer whose music Ravel admired, particularly for its orchestral colors and lyricism. Ravel is not copying an existing work by Borodin, but is imitating his characteristic style.

Style: The piece is often described as a waltz. It evokes the atmosphere and musical idiom of Borodin, with lyrical melodies and a sense of storytelling, although this is handled with Ravel ‘s own finesse and refined harmony .

A nod to Borodin: It contains elements reminiscent of the Russian composer, such as a certain Slavic melancholy, a warm lyricism and a poetic side . Ravel manages to capture the spirit of Borodin while retaining his own musical signature .

Context: These two pieces , “In the manner of Borodin” and “In the manner of Chabrier”, were written at the request of Ravel’s publisher, to be published in a collection of pastiches of French composers of the time, which explains their character of homage and stylistic imitation.

Short and concise: The piece is quite short, like most of the pieces in the collection. It is a miniature, a snapshot of Borodin’s style seen through the prism of Ravel.

In summary , ” In the Manner of Borodin” is a charming musical homage in which Ravel, with his talent as a brilliant forger, manages to embody the lyrical and poetic style of Alexander Borodin while putting his own stamp on it, in a short piece for piano .

History

The story of “In the Manner of Borodin” is closely linked to a friendship and a game of wit between Parisian musicians at the beginning of the 20th century . The idea for the piece did not come from Ravel himself , but from a friend and composer, Alfredo Casella. The latter had already written a series of six musical pastiches in 1911 and proposed to Ravel that he join forces to create a new series of “musical portraits” in the manner of other composers.

Ravel accepted this challenge, choosing two figures he deeply admired: Emmanuel Chabrier, for his French music full of vitality and clarity, and Alexander Borodin, one of the composers of the famous Russian ” Group of Five.” Borodin’s choice was all the more significant because Ravel and his friends, a circle of Parisian artists and intellectuals calling themselves “The Apaches,” had adopted a theme from Borodin’s Second Symphony as their secret rallying sign.

Thus, Ravel composed ” In the Manner of Borodin” in 1912-1913. The piece is a piano waltz, but it is a waltz that has nothing Parisian about it. On the contrary, it is imbued with the lyricism and chromaticism that he associated with Borodin. It contains a Slavic melancholy, a poetic breath and harmonies that evoke the style of the Russian composer, while remaining in the refined and elegant musical language of Ravel .

The piece , along with its companion piece “À la maniere de Chabrier,” was finally published in 1914. They received their public premiere on December 10, 1913 , at the Salle Pleyel, during a concert by the Société musicale ind épendante . This concert marked the birth of this diptych, which was not only a demonstration of pianistic virtuosity, but also an affectionate and humorous tribute to two masters whom Ravel cherished. The piece has since remained a perfect example of Ravel’s genius in appropriating a foreign style and sublimating it with his own signature.

Characteristics of Music

Maurice Ravel’s ” In the Manner of Borodin” is a piece that perfectly illustrates the art of pastiche, where the artist does not simply copy, but imbues himself with the spirit of his model to create an original and personal work. In this short piano waltz, Ravel appropriates Borodin’s musical characteristics with remarkable finesse and intelligence.

The composition is distinguished by several distinctive musical features that echo the style of the Russian composer:

A lyrical and melancholic atmosphere: The piece is imbued with an expressive and warm melody, typical of Borodin’s lyricism, often associated with the Russian soul . Ravel manages to capture this expressiveness with melodic lines that seem to breathe, carried by an “Allegro giusto” tempo that makes them both lively and elegant .

Orchestral Harmonies and Colors: Although the piece is written for solo piano, Ravel uses the keyboard to suggest the sounds of an orchestra. It features rich harmonies and expressive dissonances that are characteristic of Russian Romanticism. The composer frequently uses seventh and ninth chords that create a lush sonic atmosphere and depth of harmony, reminiscent of Borodin’s orchestral writing.

Pedal play and ostinatos: Ravel skillfully uses the sustain pedal to create “harmonic pedals” that give the impression that the melody is floating above a persistent sound base. This technique, combined with repeated rhythmic patterns ( ostinatos), is a nod to Borodin’s writing, particularly the drone effect that gives a sense of anchoring and sonic color.

A Well-Structured Waltz Form: Despite its impressionistic and pastiche character, the piece follows a clear, classical form, a waltz in D – flat major with a binary structure and a coda. This formal clarity is a trademark of Ravel, who, even in his most “impressionistic” works, always retained a keen sense of structure and musical logic, in contrast to the freer style of some of his contemporaries.

In short, “In the Manner of Borodin” is not a simple imitation, but an interpretation of Borodin’s style by a Ravel who has assimilated the elements of his model to merge them with his own writing. The result is a work which, in evoking Russian music, is undeniably and profoundly Ravelian, testifying to his technical mastery and his ability to create unique musical atmospheres .

Style(s), movement(s) and period of composition

Period and Movement

” In the Manner of Borodin” was composed by Maurice Ravel in 1912-1913, which places it at the heart of the period of modern music, more precisely in the last years of Symbolism and musical Impressionism. Ravel is often considered one of the leading figures of these movements, although he always sought to distance himself from labels.

A Dialogue between Tradition and Innovation
The piece is a perfect example of Ravel’s style, which is both innovative and deeply rooted in tradition.

Innovative: The work is innovative in its approach to harmony. Ravel uses complex chords (ninths , elevenths ) , expressive dissonances and superpositions of tones that are characteristic of his style at the time. He moves away from the strict rules of classicism to explore new sounds, much like his Impressionist contemporaries.

Traditional: However, Ravel never abandoned his attachment to classical forms and a certain structural clarity. The piece is a waltz, a traditional form. Moreover, it is a pastiche, that is , a work that imitates the style of another composer. In this case, it is Alexander Borodin, a composer of the Russian Romantic and nationalist period.

A Crossroads of Styles

The piece is a fascinating mix of several influences and styles:

Impressionist and Symbolist: The treatment of the piano, with the use of the pedal and ostinatos to create sound atmospheres and colors, is typically impressionist. The overall mood is more evocative than narrative.

Romantic and Nationalist: Ravel pays homage to Borodin by incorporating elements of his style: lyrical and expressive melodies, a certain Slavic melancholy and a narrative side . It is Borodin’s romantic and nationalist style that is imitated, showing Ravel’s admiration for Russian music.

Neoclassicism : Although it is more clearly identifiable in his later works such as Le Tombeau de Couperin, neoclassicism is already present here through the attachment to a clear, classical form (the waltz) which contrasts with the richness and boldness of the harmony.

In conclusion, “In the Manner of Borodin” is a work that demonstrates the complexity of Ravel’s style. It is both a modern piece , innovative in its harmonic language and sonority, and a traditional homage to a Romantic composer, all within a classical formal framework.

Analysis: Form, Technique(s), Texture, Harmony, Rhythm

Musical Analysis of “In the Manner of Borodin”
Maurice Ravel’s ” In the Manner of Borodin” is a piece that, beneath its simple waltz-like appearance, reveals great technical and structural sophistication. It is a perfect example of Ravel’s ability to imitate a musical style while adding his own signature.

The Method and Techniques
method for this pastiche is that of stylistic imitation. He does not literally copy a Borodin melody, but appropriates the characteristics of his style to transpose them into his own musical language. The main technique is the pianistic transcription of an orchestral thought. Ravel uses the sonorities and dynamics of the piano to evoke the richness and color of a symphony orchestra, in the manner of Borodin, whose music was particularly famous for its instrumentation.

Texture and Shape
The texture of the music is predominantly homophonic, with a clear, expressive melody in the right hand, accompanied by harmonic accompaniment in the left hand. However, moments of subtle polyphony can be heard, particularly when the main melody is doubled or enriched by other melodic lines that move independently .

The form is that of an ABA waltz, with a coda. It is a simple and clear structure, but Ravel adds variations and developments.

Part A: The main waltz is presented , with its lyrical and melancholic melody.

Part B: A more contrasting passage, often more lyrical and with a change of mode (moving from major to minor) or tonality .

Part A’: The return of the main waltz, often with subtle variations in accompaniment or harmony.

Coda: The piece ends with a concluding section which uses waltz motifs.

Harmony, Scale and Rhythm
Key : The main key is D flat major (

D♭
major), a key often associated with lyricism and a certain softness. The piece uses modulations and harmonic borrowings that enrich the sound palette.

Harmony: The harmony is both romantic and modern. Ravel uses seventh and ninth chords that create complex and expressive sound colors. There are also unresolved dissonances and chromaticism that reinforce the melancholic atmosphere of the piece .

Scale: The scale used is the diatonic (major) D-flat scale , but Ravel inserts chromatic notes and motifs that evoke exotic or oriental scales, which is another characteristic of Borodin’s music.

Rhythm: The rhythm is that of a waltz, with a well-marked three-quarter time signature . The tempo is “Allegro giusto,” meaning “fast, but in tune ,” which gives the music a lively yet elegant character . The use of ostinatos in the accompaniment (a repetition of rhythmic patterns) is a technique borrowed from Borodin that adds a hypnotic and lingering character to the piece .

Tutorial, performance tips and important playing points

Introduction

Playing Ravel’s “In the Manner of Borodin” is like engaging in a conversation with two masters . On one side , there is the lyrical passion of Alexander Borodin, and on the other, the refinement and elegance of Ravel. To succeed in this piece , you must find the balance between Russian melancholy and French clarity . Here is a tutorial, performance tips, and key points to guide you.

1. The Lyrical and Flexible Waltz

The piece is a waltz, but it is far from a simple dance piece. Focus on a tempo of “Allegro giusto,” which means “fairly fast, but with a sense of justice and accuracy.” Don’t rush; the lyricism of the melody needs to breathe.

Rubato: Ravel doesn’t specify rubato, but to capture Borodin’s romantic spirit, you can slightly speed up and slow down in certain places. The idea is to make the melody sing, not play it mechanically.

Right hand: The melody should be cantabile, that is , “singing.” Use a deep, supple touch so that each note has weight. Think of the melody like a cello or horn voice in an orchestra, with a full, warm sound.

2. The Rhythm of Accompaniment

The left hand, in addition to providing harmony, maintains the waltz rhythm. Balance is crucial.

The first beat: The first beat of the measure to

3/4

is heavy and accentuated. Give it a boost, but avoid making it too heavy. It should start the movement of the measure.

The second and third beats : The next two beats are lighter and gently accompany the first beat. Think of a pizzicato string or a light cymbal crash. The goal is to create a fluid, danceable rhythm.

The ostinato: Ravel uses a rhythmic ostinato in the first theme . Make sure this ostinato remains steady and stable. It is the foundation upon which the melody unfolds .

3. Harmonies and the Pedal

The piece is rich in harmonies that create a special atmosphere . The pedal is essential to reveal its full splendor.

The “Ravelian sound”: This is the result of judicious use of the pedal . Change pedals with each chord change to avoid muddiness, but keep the fingering legato. Sometimes, one note of the melody is held longer than the others, creating a subtle resonance that adds richness to the harmony.

Dissonances: Ravel uses ninth chords and dissonances to add tension and color. Don’t be afraid of these dissonances. Let them express themselves and resonate; they are an integral part of the beauty of the music.

4. Important Points to Work on

Clarity : Even when using the pedal, always maintain a sense of clarity. Each voice should be audible. Work on the melody and accompaniment separately before combining them.

Character : Beyond technique, interpretation is key. Think about what Ravel is trying to say. It’s a conversation between two eras, two styles. The transition from the lyrical theme to the more intimate and melancholic part must happen naturally.

Dynamics: Ravel’s dynamic indications are precise and must be respected . From “p” to “ff,” each dynamic has a meaning. Don’t overload the interpretation. Subtle nuances are as important as grand flights of fancy.

In short , to succeed with this piece , you must find the right balance between romantic expression and formal clarity . Feel free to listen to recordings of great pianists for inspiration, but don’t forget to find your own voice in this beautiful waltz.

Famous Recordings

Despite being a short piece and often considered a miniature, “In the Manner of Borodin” has been recorded by many great pianists, often as part of complete piano works by Ravel.

famous recordings , classified by type of performance :

Historical and great tradition recordings

These recordings bear witness to a time when performance was often freer and more expressive, with particular attention to poetry and color .

Vlado Perlemuter: He is an essential reference for the complete Ravel works. Perlemuter worked with the composer himself , and his interpretations are therefore of a rare authenticity. His ” In the Manner of Borodin” is both lyrical and crystal clear, with an intimate understanding of Ravel’s nuances.

Robert Casadesus: Another figure of the great French tradition . Casadesus brings an elegance and refinement that are characteristic of the French school , with a perfect mastery of rhythm and a clear and elegant sound .

Samson François : Samson François ‘ interpretation is more romantic and personal. He favors poetry and freedom of phrasing, which gives his version a more pronounced melancholy, entirely in the spirit of Borodin’s pastiche.

Standard and contemporary recordings

These recordings are often the result of a more in-depth search for the composer’s intentions, with great fidelity to the score and impressive technical virtuosity.

Jean-Yves Thibaudet: Thibaudet’s complete Ravel works are highly acclaimed . His playing is both virtuoso and poetic, and his version of “In the Manner of Borodin” is extremely fluid. He highlights the colors and harmonies of the piece with remarkable transparency.

Martha Argerich: Although she did not record Ravel’s complete works , her recordings of his works are legendary. Her fiery and passionate style , combined with impeccable technique, gives a particular intensity to the piece .

Angela Hewitt: Known for her clarity and musical intelligence, Angela Hewitt’s interpretation is a modern reference . She highlights the structure of the piece while respecting its poetic character .

Steven Osborne: His recording is renowned for its impeccable sound and analytically thought-out interpretation , while retaining emotion and poetry. It is often cited as a benchmark for Ravel’s complete piano works.

Seong-Jin Cho: More recently, this recording has been praised for its technical mastery and the maturity of its interpretation, highlighting the orchestral aspect of the piece .

These recordings offer a wide range of interpretations, from the elegant romanticism of the ancient tradition to the analytical clarity of modern interpretations, illustrating the richness of this small work and Ravel’s genius.

Episodes and anecdotes

The story of “In the Manner of Borodin” is dotted with little anecdotes that shed light not only on the piece itself , but also on the mind of its composer, Maurice Ravel, and his entourage.

The Apache War Cry

One of the most famous anecdotes concerns the group of Parisian artists and intellectuals that Ravel frequented at the beginning of the 20th century , who nicknamed themselves “The Apaches.” This name, given to them by a journalist, referred to their character as marginal and rebellious individuals. What is less well known is their secret “war cry”: a musical theme taken from the beginning of Alexander Borodin’s Second Symphony. This theme , played and sung in gratitude, became a symbol of their friendship and admiration for the Russian composer. It was therefore quite natural that Ravel, in accepting the challenge of composing a pastiche, chose Borodin as the subject, in homage to this musical complicity that united them.

The Italian Friend and the Musical Challenge

The very idea for the piece did not come from Ravel, but from one of his friends, the Italian composer Alfredo Casella. Casella had already published his own series of musical pastiches and invited several composers, including Ravel, to join it. Ravel, with his sense of humor and his passion for pastiche (which he had already practiced on other occasions), accepted the challenge with enthusiasm. This gave rise to this diptych, “In the manner of Borodin” and “In the manner of Chabrier,” two pieces that demonstrate his ability to imitate the style of very different composers , one Russian and lyrical, the other French and clear.

Pastiche and authenticity

The most subtle, and most revealing, anecdote of Ravel’s genius is found in the music itself . Ravel, a good “genius forger” as he has often been called, does not simply copy Borodin. He appropriates the style and adds his own touch. The piece is a waltz, a form not particularly associated with Borodin. Ravel uses this popular form to infuse it with the Slavic soul, melancholy, and lyricism characteristic of the Russian composer. It is a work that, on the surface, is by Borodin, but in its harmonic details and fine phrasing, is unmistakably Ravel ‘s . This duality is a musical inside joke for those familiar with the music of both composers.

Creation in peacetime… before the war

The piece was first performed in public in December 1913 at a concert of the Independent Musical Society . It was an event celebrating musicians ‘ friendship, humor, and creativity . No one could have suspected that a year later, the First World War would break out, and that the serenity and frivolity of these artistic exchanges would be swept away by the conflict. “In the Manner of Borodin” therefore remains a testament to an era of peace and carefree artistic creativity that preceded the great upheaval of the 20th century.

Similar compositions

Pastiches and tributes

In the manner of Chabrier, M.63/2 by Maurice Ravel: This is the diptych of the piece . Ravel imitates the energetic, clear and rhythmic style of Emmanuel Chabrier, another composer he admired. The contrast between the two pieces is perfect.

Tributes to a Master by Alfredo Casella: Ravel’s friend who inspired the creation of the diptych. Casella wrote several tributes to composers such as Fauré and Debussy, and his pieces share the same intellectual approach to pastiche.

Forgotten Images of Claude Debussy: Debussy, a contemporary and rival of Ravel, also wrote pieces that borrow from other styles or evoke foreign moods . “Homage to Rameau,” in Images, Book I, is an example of his approach to the past .

Russian influence

Scheherazade, Op. 35 by Nikolai Rimsky -Korsakov: Ravel admired Russian music and, like his friend Borodin, Rimsky-Korsakov was a master of orchestration and oriental lyricism. The orchestral colors and narrative atmosphere of this work have inspired many French composers .

The Poem of Ecstasy, Op. 54 by Alexander Scriabin: Ravel also appreciated Scriabin’s music. Although very different , this work shares with Ravel a great harmonic sophistication and an exploration of sound colors.

Igor Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring: Although the styles are different, Stravinsky’s work had a huge impact on Ravel and his contemporaries. The bold use of rhythm and the evocation of a mythical past resonate with Ravel’s interest in national music.

Piano pieces and miniatures

Preludes , Book I and Book II by Claude Debussy: Debussy’s preludes are piano miniatures that, like “In the Manner of Borodin,” explore a particular musical idea or atmosphere . They include evocative titles like “The Girl with Flaxen Hair” or “The Hills of Anacapri,” which are similar to the idea of a musical sketch.

Album leaves by Claude Debussy: These little piano pieces are also perfect examples of charming miniatures, which share with Ravel a great finesse of writing .

Fantasy Pieces, Op. 3 by Sergei Rachmaninov: These piano pieces share with “In the Manner of Borodin” a melancholy and lyricism that are characteristic of Russian music.

(This article was generated by Gemini. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Jean-Michel Serres Apfel Café Music QR Codes Center English 2024.

Notes on Sonatine, M.40 by Maurice Ravel, Information, Analysis and Performance Tutorial

Overview

​​

Maurice Ravel’s “Piano Sonatina, M. 40” is an iconic and concise work, composed between 1903 and 1905. It is dedicated to the composer’s friends, Ida and Cipa Godebski. The work is considered one of Ravel’s piano masterpieces, often praised for its clarity, balance, and delicacy .

Structure in three movements:

Moderate : The first movement, in F- sharp minor , is of great elegance . It is characterized by a fluid melody and a rich harmonic language, typical of Ravel’s style. It establishes a delicate and dreamy atmosphere .

Minuet Movement: This central movement, in D – flat major, is a stylized minuet . It evokes the refinement and elegance of the 18th century , while being imbued with the lyricism and modernity of Ravel. It offers a contrast in tempo and tonality with the other two movements.

Animated : The finale, in F-sharp minor, is the most technically virtuosic. It is full of energy and vivacity, with complex rhythms and time changes (especially between 3/4 and 5/4). It ends with a brilliant and luminous conclusion in F- sharp major, bringing the work to a triumphant close .

Style and features:

Conciseness and clarity: Unlike the great Romantic sonatas, Ravel’s Sonatina is distinguished by its brevity and clear structure, recalling classical forms while being modernized by its harmonic language.

Influence of French masters : Ravel drew his inspiration from the keyboard writing of 18th-century French masters such as Couperin and Rameau, which is reflected in the finesse and elegance of the work .

Delicate virtuosity : Although less monumental than other works by Ravel such as Gaspard de la nuit, the Sonatina demands great technical finesse and a particular sensitivity on the part of the performer .

Significance in Ravel’s work: The Sonatina is one of Ravel’s first works to be published by the publisher Durand, who would become his main collaborator. It marks an important stage in the development of the composer’s style .

In summary , the “Sonatine, M. 40” is a masterpiece by Ravel for piano, appreciated for its perfect balance between classical tradition and the innovation of French Impressionism , combining a strict formal structure with lyrical expressiveness and subtle virtuosity .

List of titles

Ravel’s Piano Sonatina, M. 40, is a work in three movements. It is dedicated to Ida and Cipa Godebski, great friends of the composer.

Here are the details of his movements:

I. Moderate​​

II. Minuet Movement

III. Animated

The work does not have specific German subtitles or alternative titles, being a French work in essence. The title “Sonatine” itself is a musical term for a “small sonata,” reflecting the classical structure and conciseness of the work compared to a traditional full-length sonata.

History

The story of Maurice Ravel’s Sonatina, M. 40 is as fascinating as the work itself , as its creation is linked to a small anecdote from French musical history .

In 1903, a Parisian music journal, the Weekly Critical Review, held a composition competition. The challenge was to create the first movement of a piano sonata in F- sharp minor, no longer than 75 bars. It was a very specific commission , almost a “specification” for a composer.

Ravel, who was already a renowned musician but was still finding his place in the academic world of music, took on this challenge. He composed the first movement of his future Sonatina. However, history has it that Ravel had exceeded the 75-bar limit. The movement he created was 84, which disqualified him from the competition. One can imagine the composer’s frustration, as he was both a perfectionist and a free spirit who did not easily submit to constraints.

Ironically, the revue went bankrupt shortly afterward , effectively canceling the competition. Ravel, already having a basis for work, decided not to abandon his project. He completed the work by adding two more movements: the charming “Minuet Movement” and the virtuoso “Animé.” Thus, the Sonatine was completed in 1905, becoming a complete and balanced piece .

The work was dedicated to Ravel’s friends, Ida and Cipa Godebski. This couple, who held a famous Parisian salon, was a home for many artists of the time, including the “Apaches” group of which Ravel was a member. It is interesting to note that Ravel later dedicated his suite for piano four hands, Mother Goose , to the Godebski children.

The first complete performance of the Sonatina took place in Lyon on March 10, 1906, performed by Paule de Lestang. Its Paris premiere followed shortly after . The work was received with success and has since become one of the most performed and appreciated pieces in Ravel ‘s piano repertoire.

This story is an excellent example of Ravel’s creativity , which transformed a competition failure into an accomplished and timeless work of art, combining the demands of classical form with his own modern and impressionist sensibility.

Impacts & Influences

Maurice Ravel’s Sonatina, M. 40, despite its small size, has had a significant impact and lasting influence. It is often considered a pivotal work that embodies both classical tradition and 20th-century innovations .

Impacts on piano music

The Revival of Classical Form: In an era dominated by the Romantic gigantism of composers like Richard Wagner and the Impressionist experiments of Claude Debussy, Ravel chose to return to the sonata form, but reduced it to a “sonatina.” This approach helped revitalize interest in classical structures, showing that they could be used with a modern harmonic language. 🎻

Clarity and Balance: The work is praised for its logical construction and perfect balance. Every note seems to have its place, and the music, although rich in harmony, is never overloaded. This pursuit of clarity became a hallmark of Ravel’s style and influenced other composers to favor precision and conciseness.

Piano writing: Ravel develops a virtuoso style, but one of subtle finesse and delicacy, far from the spectacular bravura of Romanticism. The third movement , “Animé,” is a perfect example, with its complex rhythms and virtuosity that serves musical expression rather than the other way around. This opened the way to a new type of virtuosity, more refined and less demonstrative .

Influences on other composers and movements

Neoclassicism: The Sonatina is one of the first works , if not the first , to be seen as a masterpiece of French neoclassicism . By reinterpreting past forms with a modern sensibility, Ravel inspired other composers, notably Igor Stravinsky and the Group of Six, to explore this path. It is a model of balance between respect for tradition and innovation.

Influence on Stravinsky: The composer Igor Stravinsky, although of a different temperament, was greatly impressed by Ravel ‘s perfectionism and formal mastery . Echoes of the search for clarity and return to more structured forms can be found in Stravinsky, particularly in his neoclassical period .

Influence on film composers: Ravel’s orchestral precision and mastery of color, already present in the Sonatina (even though it is a piano piece ) , had a considerable influence on many film composers in the 20th century , who sought to create subtle moods and complex orchestral textures.

Characteristics of Music

Maurice Ravel’s Sonatina, M. 40, is not a collection or a suite, but a single composition in three movements. Its musical characteristics are very representative of Ravel’s style and the neoclassical period .

Clarity and classic shape

Ravel takes the traditional structure of the sonata, but condenses it, hence the name “sonatine” (small sonata). There is a perfect balance between the three movements, each with a well-defined character :

Moderate : A first movement in sonata form, elegant and lyrical .

Minuet Movement: A slow, graceful movement, reminiscent of dances from the Baroque and Classical periods.

Animated : A fast and virtuoso finale, which concludes the work with energy.
This approach is an excellent example of neoclassicism, which seeks to modernize the forms of the past .

Harmony and musical language

Although the form is classical, the harmonic language is resolutely modern. Ravel uses ninth and eleventh chords , modal harmonies , and chromaticisms that give the music its color and richness. Passages are often built on pentatonic scales or ancient modes, creating an atmosphere that is both familiar and exotic. The main key, F-sharp minor, is quite unusual and contributes to the originality of the work .

Piano writing

Ravel’s writing is very refined . It is not a demonstrative virtuosity like Liszt’s, but a virtuosity of finesse and precision. The composer emphasizes textures, timbres, and clarity of melodic lines. The performer must demonstrate great dexterity for complex rhythms, especially the time changes in the last movement, as well as a sensitivity for delicate nuances .

In summary , the musical characteristics of Ravel’s Sonatina lie in the balance between classical form, modern harmony and a piano writing of great finesse, which makes it a timeless work and a masterpiece of the repertoire.

Style(s), movement(s) and period of composition

Maurice Ravel’s Sonatina, M. 40, composed between 1903 and 1905, is a fascinating work because it stands at a stylistic crossroads in early 20th-century music . It cannot be classified into a single category , but rather represents a synthesis of several musical currents.

Period : Early 20th century modernism

The Sonatina was written during the so-called modernist period. It was a time of break with 19th- century traditions , when composers explored new harmonies, new forms, and new sound textures. Ravel, along with his peers such as Claude Debussy, was at the forefront of this movement in France.

Style and Movement: A mixture of classicism, impressionism and neoclassicism
The music of the Sonatina is a blend of old and new influences, making it both a traditional and innovative work.

Traditional and Classical: Its very title , “Sonatine,” is a nod to the classical sonata form. Ravel clearly drew inspiration from the masters of the 18th century , notably French harpsichordists like François Couperin and Jean-Philippe Rameau. The second movement , a “Minuet Movement,” is a direct homage to these ancient dance forms. The work is structured in a clear and balanced manner , far from the exuberance and hypertrophy of the post-Romantic works of the period.

Innovative and Impressionist: Although the form is classical, the musical language is decidedly innovative. The work bears clear marks of musical impressionism. Ravel uses rich and complex harmonies (ninth chords , eleventh chords , etc.), delicate sound colors, and piano writing that highlights the instrument’s timbre. The music seeks to evoke atmospheres rather than tell a story , as seen in the first movement, “Modéré , ” which exudes a subtle, dreamy mood .

Neoclassical : By combining classical form with modern harmony, the Sonatina is often considered one of the first major works of French neoclassicism . This movement, which reached its peak after the First World War, aimed to return to the clarity and simplicity of ancient forms while employing a 20th-century musical language . Ravel’s work is a perfect example of this trend, showing that it is possible to create something new based on tradition.

In conclusion, Ravel’s Sonatina is a work of the modernist period. Its style is a unique fusion of several currents: it has roots in classicism (form), an aesthetic inspired by impressionism (harmony and timbre), and is a precursor to neoclassicism (synthesis of the two). It is both old and new, traditional and innovative, and it is this duality that makes it a timeless masterpiece and an essential piece for understanding the evolution of Ravel’s music and that of his time.

Analysis: Form, Technique(s), Texture, Harmony, Rhythm

Maurice Ravel’s Sonatina, M. 40, is a work rich in subtleties, combining a classical structure with a modern musical language.

Analysis of structure and form

The Sonatina is a work in three movements, following the traditional sonata form, but on a smaller scale.

Moderate : This is a movement in classical sonata form. It presents two main themes which are stated, developed, and restated , although in a more concise and fluid manner than in the Romantic sonatas. The movement is in F- sharp minor , with modulation to other keys .

Minuet Movement: This is a stylized minuet, a three-part Baroque dance form (Minuet-Trio-Minuet). Ravel preserves the ternary structure but infuses it with his unique harmonic language. The key is D- flat major.

Animated : The finale is a rondo-sonata, a form that combines the structure of the rondo (a recurring main theme ) and the characteristics of sonata form. It is the most technically virtuosic, with complex rhythms. It ends brilliantly in F-sharp major.

Analysis of texture and technique

The texture of the Sonatina is predominantly polyphonic and contrapuntal. Ravel interweaves several melodic lines, particularly in the first and last movements, rather than having a single melody accompanied by chords. The melody is often divided between the pianist’s two hands, creating a dialogue-like effect and great clarity .

The piano technique required is very refined . It is not a question of strength, but of precision, agility and lightness . The composer uses numerous arpeggios , wide chords and octaves, as well as rapid passages and changes of time, especially in the last movement, which require great virtuosity .

Harmony, scale, tonality and rhythm
Harmony: Harmony is Ravel’s trademark. It is rich, chromatic, and modal. Ravel uses enriched chords (ninths , elevenths , thirteenths ) and non-functional harmonies that create an impressionistic and ethereal atmosphere . Tritones and diminished seventh chords are also frequent .

Scales and tonality : The main tonality is F-sharp minor. Ravel explores other tonality throughout the work, and often uses ancient modes (such as the Dorian or Aeolian modes) as well as the pentatonic scale to create distinctive sounds and exotic moods.

Rhythm: Rhythm is one of the most innovative elements. Ravel uses a wide variety of rhythmic patterns and unexpected time changes (especially the alternations between 3/4 and 5/4 in the last movement) that give the music a sense of imbalance and surprise, while remaining very controlled .

In short, the Sonatina is a model of synthesis . It is at once polyphonic in texture, classical in structure, and resolutely modern in harmony, rhythm, and technique, making it a masterpiece of the early 20th-century piano repertoire .

Tutorial, performance tips and important playing points

Playing Maurice Ravel’s Sonatina, M. 40, on the piano is not just about technique, but also about understanding the composer’s aesthetics and intentions. Here’s a tutorial, performance tips, and key points for each movement.

General points​​
Clarity and precision : Ravel demands extremely precise performance . Every note must be heard clearly, even in fast passages. Avoid overlapping sounds or using the pedal excessively .

Delicate touch: The sound should never be harsh or percussive. Aim for a light, singing, and velvety touch . Ravel’s virtuosity is subtle, not demonstrative.

Rhythm: Study rhythms very carefully. Use a metronome to master complex passages, especially in the last movement.

Movement I : Moderate

Atmosphere : This movement should be played with a sense of calm and nobility. “Moderate ” is not a slow tempo, but a balanced tempo , which allows the phrases to breathe.

Technique:

Left Hand: The opening theme is in the left hand. It should be sing-song, with a beautiful sound. Make sure the right hand chords do not cover the melody .

Arpeggiated Passages : There are many arpeggiated passages . Play them smoothly and evenly , like a wave. The pedal should be used sparingly to avoid muddying the harmonies.

Performance tip: Think of the elegance of a French harpsichordist . Phrases should be long and lyrical, but with aristocratic restraint. The overall mood is dreamy and intimate.

Movement II: Minuet Movement

Atmosphere : This minuet must be exquisitely graceful and light . The character is intimate and poetic, with a sense of classicism .

Technique:

The trio: The central part (the trio) requires great mastery of legato. The melody must be played with deep expression, like a song without words.

Hand Balance: Often the left hand has complex figurations that accompany the right hand. The left hand must be light and transparent , while remaining rhythmically precise.

Performance tip: Imagine a ballet scene, where every step is measured and elegant . Ravel himself choreographed some of his works. Think of a delicate dialogue between the two hands. The sound should be clear and crystalline.

Movement III: Animated

Atmosphere : It is a movement full of energy , vivacity and virtuosity . The term “lively” is not limited to the tempo, it also suggests a certain passion and dynamism.

Technique:

Complex Rhythms: Time changes (from 3/4 to 5/4 and others) are the biggest challenge. Practice these passages very slowly with the metronome, tapping out the subdivisions to internalize them .

Chords and Octaves: The movement is filled with fast chords and octaves. Loosen your wrists to avoid tension. Don’t play forcefully, but with a quick, light gesture .

Clarity : Even at high speed, each note must be distinct. The final passage, with its sixteenth notes, must be executed with extreme precision .

Performance tip: This movement is a kind of piano perpetuum mobile. Maintain a constant energy, like a motor that runs without ever stopping . The crescendos should be gradual, and the conclusion in F- sharp major should be an explosion of light .

In summary , the key to performing Ravel’s Sonatina is mastery of sound, clarity, and rhythm. It requires a balance between technical virtuosity and artistic sensitivity, always seeking an elegance and finesse that are the composer’s trademark.

Successful piece or collection at the time ?

The success of Maurice Ravel’s Sonatina, M. 40 at the time of its release was not immediate and resounding as with other popular works, but it was quickly recognized by musical circles and gained in esteem over time.

Critical reception

At its premiere in 1906, the Sonatina was well received by music critics, who immediately noted its clarity , conciseness, and elegance . It was hailed as a work that revived 18th-century forms while being resolutely modern in its harmonic language. It was perceived as a masterpiece of perfection and refinement, and Ravel himself seemed to have a high regard for the work, regularly including it in his recitals .

However, it is important to note that its success was not on the scale of a mass phenomenon. The Sonatina was a piece intended for an informed audience, and its subtle virtuosity made it less spectacular than the great post-Romantic works.

Sales of sheet music

Sales of the Sonatina scores at the time were probably not record- breaking . Ravel’s music, although admired, was not yet as universally known as it is today. Ravel’s publisher at the time, Durand & Fils, played a crucial role in disseminating his works, but it took time for the Sonatina to become a classic of the piano repertoire.

Growing success

The Sonatina has acquired its stature as a masterpiece over time. Many renowned pianists have included it in their repertoire, and it has become a must – have piece for piano students. The fact that it is now widely available, in print or digital format, is a testament to its enduring success . Today’s music critics consider it one of Ravel’s most important works, a “shattering farewell to the world of artistic certainties,” according to musicologist Marcel Marnat.

In summary , the Sonatina was not an instant commercial “hit” , but a work whose value was recognized by experts from the moment of its release, and which has gained popularity and success over the decades to become an undisputed classic of the piano repertoire.

Famous Recordings

Ravel’s Sonatina is a benchmark work in the piano repertoire. Many great pianists have recorded it, offering varied interpretations, ranging from historical traditions to more modern approaches. Here is a list of famous recordings and essential performers .

Historical and traditional recordings

Alfred Cortot (1931 recordings): These recordings are valuable historical documents. Cortot, one of the greatest French pianists , was a contemporary of Ravel and his playing embodies the great Romantic and French tradition . His interpretation is very expressive , with great rhythmic freedom and pronounced lyricism .

Robert Casadesus: Casadesus is often considered one of Ravel’s most faithful interpreters . His playing is characterized by impeccable clarity, technical precision, and elegance that highlight the neoclassical structure of the Sonatina.

Vlado Perlemuter: A student of Ravel himself , Vlado Perlemuter benefited from direct guidance from the composer. His recordings are therefore of paramount importance. His interpretation is both rigorous and poetic, with a profound sense of color and nuance. He is an absolute reference for anyone wishing to understand the spirit of Ravel’s music.

Walter Gieseking: This German pianist, known for his impressionistic touch, left a legendary recording of the Sonatina. His interpretation is distinguished by a diaphanous sound, remarkable delicacy and fluidity, ideal for the impressionistic aspect of the work .

Standard recordings and reference interpretations
Samson François : Samson François ‘ approach is very personal and fascinating. His playing is daring, with a sense of fantasy and a unique expressiveness that moves away from simple technical perfection to create a lively and singular interpretation .

Pascal Rogé : Pascal Rogé is a world-renowned French interpreter of Ravel. His recordings are praised for their elegance , clarity, and musicality. He combines French tradition with a modern, balanced approach .

Jean-Yves Thibaudet: This French performer has recorded Ravel’s complete piano works. His approach is both technical and poetic, with a great sense of color and a rich sound.

Modern and contemporary interpretations
Martha Argerich: Although her recording is already a classic, Argerich’s interpretation is still perceived as a modern reference for its incisive virtuosity and flamboyant energy, especially in the final movement.

Pierre-Laurent Aimard: Known for his interpretations of contemporary music, Aimard brings great rhythmic precision and structural analysis to his playing, resulting in an interpretation of almost architectural clarity.

Angela Hewitt: Her Ravel discography is highly regarded . Angela Hewitt’s interpretation of the Sonatina is distinguished by a technical rigor and sensitivity that reveal textural details and nuances rarely heard .

Seong-Jin Cho: More recently, the young Korean pianist recorded a complete Ravel collection, including the Sonatina. His performance has been praised for its virtuosity, clarity , and maturity , proving the work’s relevance to new generations of performers .

Ultimately, the choice of a recording will depend on the listener’s taste: the elegance of Casadesus, the authority of Perlemuter, the energy of Argerich, or the clarity of Angela Hewitt. Each of these recordings offers a different perspective on this masterpiece of piano music.

Episodes and anecdotes

Ravel’s Sonatina, M. 40, is surrounded by a few anecdotes and episodes which shed light on its genesis and place in the composer’s life.

The missed competition

The most famous and seminal anecdote in the history of the Sonatina is that of the Weekly Critical Review competition. In 1903, this music magazine issued a challenge to composers: to write the first movement of a piano sonata in F- sharp minor , with a limit of 75 bars. Ravel set to work, but created a movement of 84 bars, automatically disqualifying him. Shortly after , the magazine went bankrupt and the competition was canceled. Fortunately, Ravel was not discouraged and decided to complete the work by adding two more movements, transforming a competition failure into a masterpiece. Without this mishap , the Sonatina as we know it might never have existed .

A price for a “bad part ”

In 1905, Ravel entered his Sonatina into the prestigious Prix de la Ville de Paris, a competition organized to promote chamber music. Ironically, the work was rejected by the jury. One of the judges, the renowned composer Vincent d’ Indy, reportedly declared the piece ” badly written.” This decision caused an uproar in Parisian artistic and musical circles, who already admired Ravel ‘s talent. This anecdote illustrates the difficulty Ravel had in being accepted by the musical establishment of his time, which was often considered too innovative, even for works that today seem classically clear.

Dedication to the composer’s friends

The dedication to Ida and Cipa Godebski is not insignificant. This couple, who held a renowned artistic and literary salon in Paris, were at the heart of Ravel’s circle of friends, nicknamed “Les Apaches.” This group of artists and writers, who met to discuss art and literature, was a crucial source of inspiration and support for Ravel. Dedicating his Sonatina to this couple was a testament to the deep friendship between them. The bond between Ravel and the Godebskis would continue, as the composer would later dedicate his suite for piano four hands, Ma mère l’Oye, to the couple’s children.

The link with Maurice Delage

The Sonatina episode is also linked to the friendship between Ravel and the composer Maurice Delage. In 1904, Delage had also composed a Sonatina, in E-flat major. Ravel, impressed, is said to have said to him: “Then I too will write one in F- sharp minor.” This is a fine example of the way in which composers of this period inspired each other, in an atmosphere of healthy emulation. Ravel’s composition of the Sonatina can be seen as a friendly response and a challenge to his friend Delage.

These anecdotes show that the creation of the Sonatina was not a simple process, but was marked by challenges, disappointments and friendships, which undoubtedly contributed to making it one of the works dearest to the hearts of Ravel and his admirers.

Similar compositions

Ravel’s Sonatina is a transitional work, both neoclassical and impressionist. To search for similar pieces is to explore composers who shared these stylistic concerns, either as contemporaries of Ravel, as predecessors who inspired him, or as successors whom he influenced .

Here are some compositions, suites or collections similar to Ravel’s Sonatina:

Other piano works by Ravel

own piano work .

Le Tombeau de Couperin, M. 68: This is the suite closest in spirit to the Sonatina. Composed during the First World War, it is a suite of 18th-century dances and forms , paying tribute to Ravel’s fallen friends. It is a perfect example of Ravel’s neoclassicism, combining ancient structure with a modern harmonic language.

Mirrors, M. 43: Although more impressionistic and virtuosic than the Sonatina, this suite shares a close attention to the colors and textures of the piano. Pieces such as “The Valley of Bells” or “A Boat on the Ocean ” evoke similar atmospheres to those of the Sonatina.

Valses nobles et sentimentales, M. 61: This suite of waltzes is another exploration of classical form through the prism of Ravel. The fluidity and elegance of the harmonic language are very similar to those of the Sonatina.

Claude Debussy (1862-1918)

The main composer of musical impressionism, Debussy greatly influenced Ravel.

Bergamasque Suite: The piece “Clair de lune” is emblematic of Impressionism, with its harmony and delicate textures. The “Minuet” from this suite is also an excellent example of Debussy’s reinterpretation of classical forms .

For the piano: This suite is an example of Debussy’s approach, combining virtuoso writing (“Toccata”) with a great search for timbre.

Emmanuel Chabrier (1841-1894)

A composer whose finesse and harmonic audacity Ravel admired.

Picturesque Pieces : This piano suite has a colorful character and a subtle humor that greatly inspired Ravel, particularly in his use of harmony.

Gabriel Faur ( 1845-1924)

Ravel’s master , Fauré influenced his taste for clarity , elegance and refinement .

Theme and Variations in C- sharp minor, Op. 73: A piece that explores classical form with a rich harmonic language and great expressiveness, in the spirit of French music of the time.

Other composers

Albert Roussel (1869-1937): His piano works, such as the Suite in F, show a clarity of form and a rhythmic energy that are close to the neoclassical style of Ravel.

Manuel de Falla (1876-1946): De Falla’s piano writing, particularly in the Spanish Pieces , combines great virtuosity with a clarity and precision reminiscent of Ravel, with the added bonus of a Spanish coloring.

(This article was generated by Gemini. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Jean-Michel Serres Apfel Café Music QR Codes Center English 2024.