Overview
Études-Tableaux, Op. 39 by Sergei Rachmaninoff is the second and final set of Rachmaninoff’s Études-Tableaux (literally “study-pictures”), composed in 1916–1917. This monumental cycle of nine etudes represents some of the most demanding and expressive works in the Romantic and early modern piano repertoire.
🔹 General Overview
Title: Études-Tableaux, Op. 39
Composer: Sergei Rachmaninoff (1873–1943)
Year Composed: 1916–1917
Premiere: First performed by Rachmaninoff himself
Dedication: To composer Igor Stravinsky
Character: Dramatic, stormy, and often tragic; deeper and darker than Op. 33
Form: Each piece is a virtuosic étude with strong narrative or pictorial elements — true “tableaux”
🔹 Stylistic Traits
Technical Mastery: Every piece pushes pianistic limits: rapid leaps, thick textures, polyrhythms, and vast dynamic ranges.
Orchestral Thinking: Rachmaninoff thought in terms of color and voice layering — these etudes often sound symphonic.
Narrative Depth: While Rachmaninoff never explicitly revealed the subjects of most pieces, he intended each as a musical “picture” or story.
Post-Romantic Expression: The set bridges Russian Romanticism with emerging modernist tensions, especially under the shadow of World War I and political upheaval.
🔹 List of Pieces
No. Key Tempo marking Notable Characteristics
1 C minor Allegro agitato Violent energy; toccata-like; stormy octave work
2 A minor Lento assai Deeply melancholic; tolling bells; funereal
3 F♯ minor Allegro molto Frenzied, galloping rhythm; relentless drive
4 B minor Allegro assai Sparse, eerie, ghostly atmosphere
5 E♭ minor Appassionato Intense lyricism; longing and despair
6 A minor Allegro Military march; rumored to depict a “Little Red Riding Hood and the Wolf” narrative
7 C minor Lento lugubre Funeral march; heavy tolling rhythms
8 D minor Allegro moderato Tumultuous; swirling, almost orchestral writing
9 D major Allegro moderato. Tempo di marcia Triumphant and expansive; almost symphonic closure
🔹 Context
Composed during a period of great personal and political upheaval (WWI, approaching Russian Revolution).
These works were written shortly before Rachmaninoff fled Russia for good.
Op. 39 is darker, more symphonic, and technically more complex than its predecessor, Op. 33.
🔹 Interpretive Challenges
Requires mature interpretative insight and exceptional pianistic technique.
Balancing clarity in complex textures and managing long, arching phrases is key.
Many pieces call for orchestral voicing, pedaling finesse, and deep emotional resonance.
🔹 Legacy
This set is considered among the greatest piano études of the 20th century.
Premiered and championed by great pianists including Rachmaninoff, Vladimir Horowitz, and Sviatoslav Richter.
A favorite in piano competitions and recitals for demonstrating both technical mastery and artistic depth.
Characteristics of Music
The Études-Tableaux, Op. 39 by Sergei Rachmaninoff form a cohesive and expressive collection with shared musical characteristics that contribute to their identity as a suite or cycle, despite each being an independent piece. Below is a detailed outline of the musical characteristics of the collection as a whole:
🔹 1. Tonal and Harmonic Language
🎼 Expanded Romantic Tonality
The collection frequently ventures into chromaticism, modal inflection, and remote modulations, yet remains grounded in tonal logic.
Common keys include minor tonalities (e.g., C minor, A minor, F♯ minor), reflecting the dark and tragic atmosphere of the set.
🎼 Dense Harmonic Textures
Rachmaninoff uses thick chordal writing, often built in four to six voices, requiring the pianist to voice inner melodies with care.
Harmonies are richly voiced like orchestral blocks, often employing non-functional progressions that emphasize color over resolution.
🔹 2. Rhythm and Meter
🎵 Rhythmic Drive and Complexity
Relentless rhythmic propulsion drives many of the etudes (e.g., No. 1, No. 3, No. 6), sometimes with motoric ostinatos.
Frequent irregular meters, cross-rhythms, and syncopations add turbulence and unpredictability.
🎵 Rubato and Expressive Freedom
Slower etudes (like No. 2 and No. 5) feature elastic rubato and long, suspended phrasing, mirroring vocal and orchestral styles.
Rachmaninoff allows for interpretive nuance with tempo fluctuations that suggest improvisation or narrative pacing.
🔹 3. Texture and Timbre
🎹 Orchestral Piano Writing
Textures evoke different orchestral instruments — timpani (No. 7), brass fanfares (No. 9), string tremolos, bell tones, etc.
Massive use of layered textures, requiring independence between the hands and often even within one hand.
🎹 Contrast Between Transparency and Density
Some etudes (like No. 4) use sparse, ghostly writing, while others (like No. 1 or 9) are orchestral in volume and density.
Dynamic range is extreme, from whispering pianissimos to overwhelming fortissimo climaxes.
🔹 4. Thematic and Motivic Unity
🎶 Motivic Development
Many etudes rely on the transformation of small motifs into dramatic statements.
Repetition, sequence, and motivic variation are tightly controlled, enhancing each etude’s narrative arc.
🎶 Symbolism and Narrative Implication
Rachmaninoff called these “picture studies” — some pieces clearly suggest scenes or characters (e.g., No. 6 = “Little Red Riding Hood and the Wolf”), while others are more abstract or symbolic.
🔹 5. Expressive and Emotional Content
🎭 Tragic, Brooding Character
Reflects the emotional turmoil of the time (WWI, Russian Revolution, Rachmaninoff’s impending emigration).
Frequent use of funeral marches (Nos. 2, 7), lamenting themes, and chromatic descents conveys loss and instability.
🎭 Moments of Radiance and Triumph
While mostly dark, some works (e.g., No. 9 in D major) suggest triumph or spiritual release, functioning as a concluding apotheosis.
Contrast between despair and hope adds to the emotional depth of the suite.
🔹 6. Virtuosity and Technical Challenges
🎹 Physical Demands
Requires massive hand spans, octave leaps, cross-hand playing, and rapid passagework.
Rachmaninoff’s large hands informed the dense chord voicing and wide spacing.
🎹 Artistic Virtuosity
Not merely mechanical etudes — these are poetic, painterly, and dramatic.
Technical challenges serve expressive purposes, not mere display.
🔹 7. Cyclical Cohesion
While each etude stands independently, the collection is unified by:
Key relationships: many are in related or complementary minor keys, giving the set a dark tonal framework.
Textural and emotional contrast: Rachmaninoff carefully varies mood, tempo, and texture to give the set a balanced structure.
Recurring motifs and gestures: Tolling bells, descending chromatic lines, stormy figures, and funereal rhythms recur across multiple etudes.
Summary
The Études-Tableaux, Op. 39 is not just a set of piano studies — it’s a monumental suite of musical poems that integrate:
Virtuosity and vision
Poetry and power
Tragedy and transcendence
Each étude stands alone, but together they form a symphonic tapestry for solo piano, unrivaled in its emotional intensity and pianistic invention.
Analysis, Tutoriel, Interpretation & Importants Points to Play
🎹 ÉTUDE-TABLEAU NO. 1 IN C MINOR – Allegro agitato
1. Analysis
Form: Sonata-like structure, with a stormy main theme and contrasting lyrical episode.
Character: Aggressive, relentless toccata with large leaping chords and octave-driven motion.
Motivic unity: Rhythmic cells recur obsessively throughout (short-short-long figures).
2. Tutorial & Technique
Key issues: Octave technique, wrist flexibility, wide leaps, controlled arm motion.
Pedaling: Minimal use — rely on finger legato and dry attacks to avoid blurring.
Fingering: Use alternate fingerings for octave passages to manage fatigue.
3. Interpretation
Evokes imagery of battle, fire, or storm — think of it like a Russian “Ride of the Valkyries.”
Maintain rhythmic bite and avoid over-pedaling.
Observe dynamic extremes and sudden contrasts.
4. Performance Priorities
Accuracy in leaps.
Rhythmic integrity and drive.
Controlling fatigue — arm weight must be managed carefully.
🎹 ÉTUDE-TABLEAU NO. 2 IN A MINOR – Lento assai
1. Analysis
Form: ABA with an elegiac outer section and dramatic central climax.
Texture: Bell tolling in low register; mournful melody above.
Harmony: Chromatic descent underpins the sense of fatalism.
2. Tutorial & Technique
Voicing: Control layering between bells and melody.
Tone: Cultivate depth and roundness, especially in pianissimo.
Pedaling: Use half-pedal and pedal overlap to sustain resonance.
3. Interpretation
Often seen as a funeral lament — tragic, but dignified.
Central section is explosive; use rubato to shape phrases around it.
4. Performance Priorities
Left hand: balance between weight and clarity in bell tones.
Right hand: cantabile with inner breathing and phrasing.
Silence matters — observe rests as structural punctuation.
🎹 ÉTUDE-TABLEAU NO. 3 IN F♯ MINOR – Allegro molto
1. Analysis
Form: A–B–A with coda.
Character: A wild gallop, motoric and relentless, possibly evoking a horse ride.
Texture: Constant motion with short bursts of melody embedded.
2. Tutorial & Technique
RH figuration: Fast double notes and broken intervals.
LH rhythm: Keeps a galloping pulse — metronomic control is crucial.
Coordination: Hands are often displaced rhythmically, requiring acute timing.
3. Interpretation
Intense and urgent — akin to Schumann’s Aufschwung or Liszt’s Mazeppa.
Build momentum, but avoid harshness — clarity over noise.
4. Performance Priorities
Finger articulation and velocity.
Avoiding tension — this is a “fingers over keys” etude.
Carefully voice melodic lines hidden in texture.
🎹 ÉTUDE-TABLEAU NO. 4 IN B MINOR – Allegro assai
1. Analysis
Character: Desolate, spectral, and eerie. Possibly a nightscape or ghostly procession.
Texture: Sparse; a haunting, chromatic melody weaves above irregular harmonies.
Form: Through-composed, loosely ternary with a more intense central passage.
2. Tutorial & Technique
Voicing: RH needs careful control to bring out the wandering melody over whispering LH textures.
Evenness: RH contains repeated notes and sighing figures that require finger control, not arm weight.
Pedaling: Delicate and partial; just enough to blend tones without clouding transparency.
3. Interpretation
Think of a mysterious nocturne, perhaps evoking mist, shadows, or spiritual absence.
Pace: Resist the urge to rush; the silence between notes is expressive.
Color: Use subtle dynamic inflection and pedaling to build atmosphere.
4. Performance Priorities
Intimacy over drama — this piece is introverted and spectral.
Achieve maximum expression with minimum force.
Keep sound luminous and fragile.
🎹 ÉTUDE-TABLEAU NO. 5 IN E♭ MINOR – Appassionato
1. Analysis
Form: Broad ABA’ with a climax in the middle, then fading coda.
Character: Lyric and intense, filled with inner turbulence and passionate climaxes.
Texture: Lush inner voices with vocal-style melodic lines.
2. Tutorial & Technique
Inner voices: RH must sing the top line while maintaining independence from accompanying inner notes.
Arpeggiation: LH often has expansive arpeggios that require pedal-blending and hand economy.
Control: Use forearm weight and deep key attack for singing tone.
3. Interpretation
Think Russian romance or emotional confession — warm, expressive, deeply human.
Rubato should feel organic, breathing with the phrasing.
Avoid sentimentalism; instead, let harmonic tension guide expression.
4. Performance Priorities
Layered voicing is essential — especially in thick, legato chords.
Rich pedal coloration.
Let each phrase arc naturally toward a peak and relax.
🎹 ÉTUDE-TABLEAU NO. 6 IN A MINOR – Allegro
1. Analysis
Often nicknamed “Little Red Riding Hood and the Wolf” — though not confirmed by Rachmaninoff, the imagery fits:
Opening: Nervous scurrying = Red Riding Hood.
Middle: Heavy octaves = Wolf.
Ending: Sudden cut-off = the wolf’s triumph.
Form: Dramatic, episodic narrative with contrasting motifs.
2. Tutorial & Technique
RH: Fast repeated notes and light passagework — balance control and speed.
LH: Aggressive octaves — keep relaxed wrist, use forearm rotation.
Dynamics: Rapid shifts between pianissimo and fortissimo — avoid buildup of tension.
3. Interpretation
Highly narrative — imagine you’re telling a suspenseful fairy tale with music.
RH must stay light and frightened; LH must be brutal and overpowering.
Don’t play it uniformly loud — it’s about psychological contrast.
4. Performance Priorities
Extreme dynamic drama.
Character differentiation — RH (nervous) vs LH (predatory).
Sudden ending: make it shocking, as if abruptly interrupted.
🎹 ÉTUDE-TABLEAU NO. 7 IN C MINOR – Lento lugubre
1. Analysis
Character: A funeral march or lament, imbued with Russian Orthodox choral darkness.
Texture: Thick, solemn block chords in both hands, sometimes voice-led like a choral dirge.
Form: Ternary (ABA’), gradually intensifying to a thunderous climax and then subsiding.
2. Tutorial & Technique
Chordal control: Both hands often play dense chords—requires deep, weighted playing with full arm support.
Tone color: Avoid harshness; even fortissimo passages must remain rounded and organ-like.
Pedal: Use overlapping pedal changes, especially for sustained harmonies.
3. Interpretation
Treat as a processional — tragic, slow, and inexorable.
Avoid rhythmic exaggeration or tempo fluctuations; let the solemnity carry.
Invoke bells, chants, and Orthodox gravity in tone production.
4. Performance Priorities
Voicing inner voices subtly within thick chords.
Balance: Chords must resonate without blurring.
Dynamic pacing — start with restraint and save power for the climax.
🎹 ÉTUDE-TABLEAU NO. 8 IN D MINOR – Allegro moderato
1. Analysis
Character: Surging, relentless waves of motion. Possibly an image of the sea or storm.
Texture: Continuous 16th-note figures in RH; broad harmonic support in LH.
Form: A–B–A with a stormy recapitulation and a coda.
2. Tutorial & Technique
RH: Needs excellent wrist mobility and finger dexterity for flowing figuration.
LH: Anchors with big chords — must be strong but not heavy.
Rotation and economy of movement are crucial to avoid fatigue.
3. Interpretation
Think of wind, water, or flight — the music flows, crests, and crashes like waves.
Maintain directional motion — phrases are long and arching.
Crescendos often act like swelling surf.
4. Performance Priorities
Continuous RH movement — no stiffness or interruptions.
Balance of texture: RH shimmer vs LH stability.
Clarity in rapid passagework even under big dynamics.
🎹 ÉTUDE-TABLEAU NO. 9 IN D MAJOR – Allegro moderato. Tempo di marcia
1. Analysis
Character: Majestic, triumphant, orchestral. Possibly symbolic of victory, coronation, or divine transcendence.
Form: Grand arch form with contrasting themes and a climactic apotheosis.
Harmony: Bold and radiant, making extensive use of D major’s brightness and sonority.
2. Tutorial & Technique
Chordal texture: RH plays thick chords or doubled lines — requires strength and stretch.
Orchestration: Think like a conductor — LH often doubles bass lines and inner counterpoint.
Fingering: Chord voicings require careful finger substitution and planning.
3. Interpretation
A triumphant procession — imagine an imperial ceremony or a resurrection scene.
Maintain noble tone — the tempo should never rush.
RH must be bold yet clear — use arm weight and supported sound.
4. Performance Priorities
Clarity in thick textures.
Controlled grandeur — avoid bombast.
Expressive phrasing even in power-driven sections.
🔚 GENERAL CONCLUSIONS ON OP. 39
Virtuosic demands: Op. 39 is significantly more difficult than Op. 33 — denser, darker, more symphonic.
Imagery: While Rachmaninoff refused to name all sources, each piece tells a poetic story without words.
Sound world: The pianist must “orchestrate” — layering colors, dynamics, and resonances like a symphony.
History
The Études-tableaux, Op. 39, by Sergei Rachmaninoff form a remarkable chapter in the composer’s artistic journey—both as a pianist and as a deeply introspective musical storyteller. Written in 1916–1917, this set of nine études was composed during a profoundly turbulent moment in Rachmaninoff’s life and in Russian history.
By 1916, Russia was in the throes of World War I and teetering on the brink of revolution. The world Rachmaninoff knew was beginning to collapse. Amidst this uncertainty, the composer retreated to his country estate in Ivanovka, seeking solace and creative sanctuary. There, he completed Op. 39, infusing it with a density of emotion and complexity that goes far beyond mere technical study. Unlike his earlier Op. 33 études, which already hinted at narrative depth, the Op. 39 set is darker, more turbulent, and more symphonic in nature.
Rachmaninoff called these pieces “Études-tableaux”—literally, “study-pictures”—a term that suggests not only technical development but also pictorial imagination. He was purposefully vague about the programmatic content, declining to attach specific titles or stories, although he occasionally hinted at imagery behind individual works. When Ottorino Respighi orchestrated five of the Études in the 1930s, Rachmaninoff did reveal a few visual inspirations (such as sea and funeral cortege), but for the most part, he wanted performers to find their own emotional narratives.
Stylistically, Op. 39 reflects a maturing Rachmaninoff—one less overtly Romantic and more austere, psychologically searching. The études are monumental in scope and almost orchestral in their layering and range. Many elements foreshadow the gloom and spiritual weight of his Symphonic Dances (1940). They are also infused with his characteristic Russian bell-like sonorities, modal harmonies, and Orthodox liturgical echoes.
Importantly, Op. 39 would become Rachmaninoff’s final work for solo piano before he fled Russia after the October Revolution. After 1917, his compositional output slowed dramatically as he took on the role of touring virtuoso in exile. These études thus mark the end of an era in his compositional life—his last statements from Russian soil.
Today, Op. 39 stands not only as a pinnacle of 20th-century piano literature but also as a deeply personal document—music of exile, tension, prophecy, and profound inner vision. It demands not just fingers, but imagination, courage, and soul.
Episodes & Trivia
The Études-Tableaux, Op. 39 by Sergei Rachmaninoff are not only musically rich but also surrounded by intriguing anecdotes, episodes, and historical trivia. Here are some notable and revealing facts that add depth to this monumental work:
🎭 1. The Composer Refused to Explain Them — Until He Didn’t
Rachmaninoff was famously secretive about the meaning behind these études. He deliberately left them untitled, believing that revealing the exact image or inspiration would restrict the listener’s imagination. However, in the 1930s, when Ottorino Respighi asked for descriptive clues in order to orchestrate five of the Études-Tableaux, Rachmaninoff finally relented—at least partially.
He provided some imagery for five études (four from Op. 33, one from Op. 39), such as:
Op. 39 No. 2 (A minor): “The Sea and the Seagulls.”
Despite this, most of the Op. 39 études remain open to interpretation, which has invited much speculation and personal association from performers.
🐺 2. Op. 39 No. 6 and the Wolf
This étude in A minor is often referred to—unofficially—as “Little Red Riding Hood and the Wolf.” The nickname did not come from Rachmaninoff himself, but the imagery is strikingly persuasive:
The scurrying right-hand figure suggests a terrified girl fleeing.
The thunderous left-hand octaves suggest a predator—possibly the wolf.
The brutal ending (a sudden, loud A minor chord that silences the music) has led pianists to conclude that the wolf wins.
Whether intentional or not, it remains one of the most vivid programmatic guesses about Rachmaninoff’s music.
🎼 3. Written During War and Collapse
Op. 39 was composed in 1916–1917, against the backdrop of:
World War I, which deeply affected the Russian psyche and cultural life.
The approaching Russian Revolution, which would soon force Rachmaninoff into permanent exile.
These études are often described as “apocalyptic”, “prophetic”, and “tragic”, capturing a world in spiritual and social crisis.
🔔 4. Orthodox Bells and Funeral Rites
Several études in Op. 39 reflect the influence of Russian Orthodox liturgy, a recurrent theme in Rachmaninoff’s works:
No. 7 in C minor (Lento lugubre) evokes a funeral procession, with deep tolling chords resembling church bells.
This spiritual gravity parallels the All-Night Vigil and Isle of the Dead, reflecting Rachmaninoff’s obsession with mortality and Russian sacred music.
🖼️ 5. They’re Like Miniature Tone Poems
The term Tableaux implies “pictures” or “scenes.” Rachmaninoff wasn’t aiming for traditional études (like Chopin or Liszt), but rather brief tone poems for solo piano—works that combine narrative suggestion with intense pianistic demands. In this way, they’re closer to:
Debussy’s Preludes or
Mussorgsky’s Pictures at an Exhibition than to Chopin’s virtuosic showpieces.
👋 6. The End of Russian Rachmaninoff
The Études-Tableaux, Op. 39 were the last solo piano pieces Rachmaninoff composed before leaving Russia forever in 1917. After settling in the West, he wrote very few solo piano works. These études thus represent:
A culmination of his Russian identity, and
A final emotional outpouring before the trauma of exile and the transformation into a full-time concert artist.
🧠 7. Mental and Physical Demands
Rachmaninoff himself had massive hands (reportedly could span a 13th), but he also wrote with a performer’s sensitivity. Nevertheless, Op. 39 is among the most technically and psychologically demanding sets in the piano repertoire. Pianists must juggle:
Symphonic textures
Narrative pacing
Expressive voicing
Ferocious technique
For this reason, the études are sometimes compared in scope to Liszt’s Transcendental Études or even orchestral works.
Similar Compositions / Suits / Collections
If you’re drawn to the dramatic, narrative-rich, and pianistically challenging world of Rachmaninoff’s Études-tableaux, Op. 39, there are several other works—by both Rachmaninoff and other composers—that offer a similar blend of virtuosity, emotional depth, and imagery. These works may not share the exact format, but they parallel Op. 39 in spirit, structure, or intensity.
By Rachmaninoff himself
Études-tableaux, Op. 33
The direct precursor to Op. 39, these eight (originally nine) études are somewhat more lyrical and less tragic, but they already hint at the programmatic intent. They are rich in contrast, with several brilliant and introspective moments.
Moments musicaux, Op. 16
A suite of six contrasting pieces—ranging from elegiac to thunderous—these foreshadow many of the gestures and moods in Op. 39. They are highly expressive and technically demanding.
Prelude in B minor, Op. 32 No. 10
Although a single prelude, it shares the same somber weight and existential intensity as the darker études. It’s among Rachmaninoff’s most powerful pieces.
By other composers
Franz Liszt – Transcendental Études, S.139
Like Op. 39, these are not just technical studies but expressive poems. Many are based on dramatic or nature-driven themes, with towering technical and emotional demands.
Alexander Scriabin – Études, Op. 42 & Op. 65
Particularly the later études, which verge on the mystical and ecstatic, share the intense spiritual and pianistic complexity of Rachmaninoff’s darker works.
Claude Debussy – Études (Book I & II)
Though harmonically and stylistically different, Debussy’s études aim to develop pianistic color and sonority in a highly imaginative way, similar in artistic ambition.
Sergei Prokofiev – Visions fugitives, Op. 22
These are brief, sharply-etched vignettes that balance lyricism and irony. Some share the sarcastic or grotesque qualities hinted at in Op. 39’s stormier études.
Olivier Messiaen – Vingt regards sur l’Enfant-Jésus
Though spiritual and modernist in tone, Messiaen’s monumental cycle mirrors the grand scope and philosophical introspection of Rachmaninoff’s Op. 39.
Modest Mussorgsky – Pictures at an Exhibition
Perhaps the most similar in idea: musical “pictures” originally for piano, later orchestrated. Its dramatic contrasts, vivid imagery, and bold pianism echo the Tableaux spirit.
Leoš Janáček – On an Overgrown Path
A highly personal suite full of nostalgia, sorrow, and folk flavor, it parallels Op. 39’s introspective and pictorial qualities, albeit in a more fragmentary way.
These collections and cycles—whether inspired by poetic imagery, emotional states, or virtuosic exploration—resonate closely with the concept and power of the Études-tableaux, Op. 39. They stand as milestones in the solo piano repertoire that, like Rachmaninoff’s études, ask not only for technical mastery but for deep imagination and artistic vision.
(This article was generated by ChatGPT. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)
Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube
Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify
