Tag: anglais

Posted on

Notes on First Term at the Piano, Sz.53 (1913, 1923) by Béla Bartók: Information, Analysis and Performance Tutorial

General Overview

First Term at the Piano is a collection of 18 short pedagogical piano pieces by Hungarian composer Béla Bartók. Published in 1929, the pieces were originally composed around 1913 as part of a larger piano method Bartók co-authored with Sándor Reschofsky. The collection serves as an excellent and highly musical introduction to Bartók’s unique compositional style for beginning pianists.

Key Characteristics

Educational Purpose: The pieces are designed to guide students from the very earliest stages of piano playing. The difficulty progresses from simple melodies that can be learned in a student’s first few weeks of lessons to pieces that are more challenging, approaching a Grade 2 level.

Folk Music Influence: Many of the pieces are arrangements of Hungarian folk songs or are original compositions written in a folk-like style. This reflects Bartók’s deep interest in and extensive research of Eastern European folk music, which heavily influenced his work.

A “Living Soul”: Unlike the often-stale “wooden-puppet” literature available for beginners at the time, Bartók’s pieces were praised for having a “living soul and a thinking brain.” They are not just technical exercises; they are charming, characterful miniatures.

Precursor to Mikrokosmos: First Term at the Piano can be seen as a stepping stone or a more accessible companion to Bartók’s most famous pedagogical work, the six-volume Mikrokosmos. While Mikrokosmos is a comprehensive, progressive series that eventually leads to professional-level compositions, First Term at the Piano provides an ideal, earlier introduction to his sound world.

Notational Nuances: The collection introduces students to elements characteristic of Bartók’s music, such as unconventional rhythms, modes, and specific articulations (dots, dashes, and slurs).

Musical and Technical Benefits: The pieces offer musical and technical benefits, helping students develop a strong sense of rhythm, musicality, and coordination while familiarizing them with 20th-century harmonies and textures.

Characteristics of Music

Béla Bartók’s First Term at the Piano is a collection of 18 short piano pieces that serve as an introduction to his unique musical language. The collection is notable for its blend of traditional pedagogical forms with modern compositional techniques and a strong influence from folk music.

Key Musical Characteristics

1. Folk Music Influence

A central feature of the collection is the pervasive influence of Hungarian and other Eastern European folk music. Many of the pieces are either direct arrangements of folk songs or original compositions written in a folk-like style. This is a hallmark of Bartók’s entire oeuvre, but in this collection, it is presented in a simplified, accessible manner for beginners. This exposes students to new scales, modes, and rhythms outside of the standard major and minor key system.

2. Rhythmic Vitality and Unconventional Meter

The pieces often feature vibrant, asymmetrical rhythms that are characteristic of folk dances. Students are introduced to syncopation, unusual rhythmic patterns, and mixed meters. This challenges the student to develop a strong rhythmic sense beyond the simple, uniform meters of much of the standard beginner repertoire.

3. Distinctive Articulation and Touch

Bartók was meticulous about his performance markings. The pieces are filled with specific, detailed notations for articulation, including dots for staccato, lines for tenuto, and slurs. This focus on “touch” and articulation helps students develop a nuanced and dynamic control of the keyboard from an early stage, which is crucial for performing 20th-century music.

4. Harmonic Language

While the pieces are generally simple, they do not shy away from dissonance. Bartók introduces students to bitonality (the use of two different keys simultaneously) and harmonies based on modes and folk scales rather than traditional major-minor tonality. This gently prepares the student’s ear for the more complex and often percussive harmonies found in Bartók’s later works like Mikrokosmos.

5. Pedagogical Progression

The collection is structured with a clear pedagogical progression. The pieces start with simple, homophonic melodies played by a single hand, gradually introducing two-handed playing, and then presenting more complex technical and musical challenges as the collection proceeds. Each piece is a miniature study in a specific technical or musical concept, such as rhythm, balance between hands, or a specific articulation.

Style(s), Movement(s) and Period of Composition

Béla Bartók’s First Term at the Piano (1913/1929) occupies a fascinating and unique position in musical history. Its style can be characterized as a blend of several influences, making it both new and innovative for its time, and a departure from the musical conventions of the past.

A New and Innovative Style

The music of First Term at the Piano is fundamentally modern. It was written at a time when composers were moving away from the lush, expansive sound of Late Romanticism and the ethereal harmonies of Impressionism. Bartók, along with contemporaries like Stravinsky and Schoenberg, was at the forefront of this new musical direction. The pieces are a deliberate effort to create a new kind of pedagogical literature that wasn’t tied to the “wooden-puppet” quality of traditional beginner pieces.

Key Stylistic Elements

Folklorism / Nationalism: The most defining characteristic is its grounding in Hungarian and Eastern European folk music. Bartók was a pioneer of ethnomusicology, and his intensive study of authentic peasant melodies and rhythms deeply informed his compositional style. This is a form of musical nationalism, but unlike the 19th-century Romantic nationalism of composers like Liszt, Bartók’s approach was more scientific and academic, incorporating the raw, unpolished, and often asymmetrical qualities of the folk material. This makes the music feel earthy and “primitive.”

Modernism / Avant-Garde: The harmonies and rhythms in the collection were very “new” for the time. Bartók introduces concepts like bitonality (the use of two different keys simultaneously) and harmonies based on modes and pentatonic scales—concepts that were at the forefront of 20th-century musical thought. While these ideas are presented in a simple form for beginners, they are still a radical departure from the traditional major-minor system. This puts the collection squarely in the realm of modernism. The pieces also explore polymodality and dissonance, challenging the ears of both students and listeners accustomed to traditional harmonies.

Polyphony and Monophony: The collection includes pieces that are both monophonic (a single melodic line) and polyphonic (multiple independent melodic lines). “Dialogue I” and “Dialogue II,” for example, are simple polyphonic exercises, preparing students for more complex counterpoint. However, many pieces are primarily homophonic, featuring a folk-like melody in one hand with a simple, often repetitive, accompaniment in the other.

Percussive Use of the Piano: While not as extreme as in his later works (like the Piano Concerto No. 1), Bartók begins to treat the piano not just as a melodic instrument but as a percussive one. The use of repetitive notes, syncopated rhythms, and strong accents brings a rhythmic drive and a sense of “hammering” to the music, a feature that would become a hallmark of his mature style.

In conclusion, First Term at the Piano is not easily categorized under a single historical style. It is a work of modernism, but one that is rooted in nationalism and the authentic folk traditions of Hungary. It is both innovative in its pedagogical approach and a clear precursor to the more complex and highly original music of Bartók’s mature career, such as Mikrokosmos. It is a testament to Bartók’s belief that even music for beginners could have a “living soul” and a “thinking brain.”

Analysis, Tutorial, Interpretation & Important Points to Play

To play Béla Bartók’s First Term at the Piano effectively, a performer and teacher must move beyond a traditional approach. The collection’s value lies in its unique pedagogical framework, which prepares students for modern musical language. Here’s a general overview of the important points for performance and analysis.

1. Analysis and Interpretation

Rhythmic Nuance: Don’t treat the rhythms as purely mechanical. Many of the pieces are based on folk dances and songs, which have a natural, speech-like rhythm. Pay close attention to the accents (>), staccatos (.), and tenutos (-). These markings are crucial for giving the music its character and life, distinguishing it from a simple exercise.

Aural Acuity: Bartók’s pieces are not always in traditional major or minor keys. He uses modes (like Dorian, Mixolydian, and Phrygian) and pentatonic scales. Students should be encouraged to listen carefully to the tonal centers and the unique sonorities created by these scales. A good practice is for students to sing the melodies before they play them. This trains the ear and helps them understand the non-traditional melodic contours.

Balance of Hands: Bartók often gives both hands important melodic material. In pieces like “Dialogue,” the hands engage in a kind of musical conversation. The performer must be mindful of the balance between the hands, ensuring that the melody is not buried by the accompaniment. This requires a sensitive and controlled touch from each hand.

2. Important Points for Piano Technique

Finger Independence and Strength: The pieces, especially the later ones, require a high degree of finger independence. Bartók’s fingerings, which are often provided in the score, are very specific and designed to achieve a certain sound or to reinforce a specific technical idea. It’s important to adhere to these fingerings as a guide.

Touch and Articulation: The use of different touches is paramount. The music is not just legato or staccato; it demands a variety of articulations. Practice each articulation—staccato, tenuto, and legato—in isolation before combining them. This builds a versatile and dynamic touch. The piano should be treated at times as a percussive instrument, particularly in the dance-like pieces, but this should be done with a controlled, “hammer-like” touch, not a harsh one.

Relaxation: Despite the rhythmic energy and percussive demands, a relaxed hand and arm are essential. Tension will hinder the ability to produce the various touches and will make the music sound stiff.

3. Tutorial and Pedagogical Approach

Start with Singing: As mentioned, a great way to begin a new piece is to have the student sing the melody first. This helps them internalize the rhythmic and melodic shape before they even touch the piano.

Analyze the Structure: Before playing, the student should identify the form of the piece. Is it a folk song? A dance? A dialogue? Understanding the context and structure helps with interpretation and memorization. Look for repeating phrases, call-and-response patterns, and rhythmic motifs.

Gradual Introduction of Concepts: The collection is a progressive sequence. Teachers should use the pieces to gradually introduce new concepts, such as two-handed playing, different modes, syncopation, and specific articulation marks. It’s a stepping stone to more advanced works, including Bartók’s own Mikrokosmos.

Embrace the “New” Sound: The most important point is to encourage students to enjoy the unique and sometimes “strange” sounds of the music. Bartók’s music is not just a technical exercise; it’s an entry point into the vibrant and challenging world of 20th-century music. Teachers should help students appreciate the rhythmic vitality and colorful harmonies, rather than seeing them as a deviation from the norm.

History

First Term at the Piano has a history rooted in Bartók’s early efforts in musical pedagogy. The collection was not initially conceived as a stand-alone work but rather as part of a larger project to create a new kind of piano method for beginners.

In 1913, Béla Bartók collaborated with his colleague, the pianist and teacher Sándor Reschofsky, to write a comprehensive piano method called Zongoraiskola (“Piano School”). This method was commissioned by the publisher Rózsavölgyi & Co. Within this larger method, Bartók contributed 48 short performance pieces designed to accompany Reschofsky’s exercises. Bartók’s goal was to create pieces that, even at a simple level, had “flesh and blood, a living soul and a thinking brain,” moving away from what he saw as the stale and mechanical nature of much of the existing beginner repertoire.

This collaboration was an important step in Bartók’s pedagogical journey, prefiguring his later, more famous work, Mikrokosmos. It allowed him to explore his ideas on teaching piano, which were deeply influenced by his research into Eastern European folk music.

Years later, in 1929, Bartók decided to select a portion of these earlier pieces for independent publication. He chose 18 of the original 48 pieces, arranging them into the collection we know today as First Term at the Piano (Sz. 53, BB 66). This revised selection was a way for Bartók to bring his unique musical approach to a wider audience, presenting a concise and progressive introduction to his style for beginning pianists. The pieces were published by the Hungarian firm Rózsavölgyi and later by other publishers like Schott and Boosey & Hawkes.

Similar Compositions / Suits / Collections

Béla Bartók’s First Term at the Piano stands out for its blend of pedagogy, modernism, and folk music. While it is a unique collection, there are several other works—some earlier, some contemporary, and some later—that share similar goals or musical characteristics.

Bartók’s Other Pedagogical Works
The most obvious and direct comparison is to Bartók’s other works for piano students.

For Children (1908-1909): This is a two-volume collection of 79 pieces based on Hungarian and Slovakian folk songs. It is slightly more advanced than First Term at the Piano and is a fantastic next step for students. The pieces are charming and lyrical, and they delve deeper into the rhythmic and modal nuances of Eastern European folk music.

Mikrokosmos (1926-1939): This is Bartók’s monumental, six-volume progressive encyclopedia of piano music, taking a student from the very beginning to professional-level mastery. First Term at the Piano can be seen as a mini-Mikrokosmos, introducing the same concepts of folk music, bitonality, and specific articulations, but in a much more concise and accessible format.

Other 20th-Century Composers

Many other 20th-century composers also wrote pedagogical works that broke with 19th-century traditions.

Dmitry Kabalevsky (1904-1987): His collections, such as 30 Pieces for Children, Op. 27 and 24 Pieces for Children, Op. 39, are very popular. Like Bartók, Kabalevsky writes with a clear, engaging, and often programmatic style. His music is melodically and rhythmically distinct and is a great way to introduce students to a more modern, yet still tonal, sound.

Sergei Prokofiev (1891-1953): While not a pedagogical series, his Music for Children, Op. 65, is a collection of twelve character pieces that are rhythmically dynamic and harmonically adventurous. They are excellent for students transitioning to an intermediate level and share Bartók’s percussive and modern sensibility.

Other Nationalistic Pedagogical Works

Composers from various countries used their own folk music to create unique pedagogical works.

Zoltán Kodály (1882-1967): As Bartók’s close friend and collaborator in folk music research, Kodály’s works are a natural comparison. While he is more known for his vocal-based methods, his piano music, like his 7 Piano Pieces, Op. 11, also draws on folk influences with a distinctive Hungarian flavor.

Aram Khachaturian (1903-1978): His collection Adventures of Ivan is an excellent set of pieces for developing character and rhythmic precision. They are stylistically distinct, with a clear Armenian folk influence and a vibrant, sometimes driving rhythmic quality similar to Bartók.

Classical & Romantic Collections with a Progressive/Character-Based Approach

While stylistically different, these older collections share a similar educational philosophy.

Robert Schumann’s Album for the Young, Op. 68: This is one of the most famous collections of pedagogical character pieces. Each piece has a title and a distinct mood, helping students develop musicality and interpretation. While harmonically rooted in Romanticism, it shares Bartók’s goal of teaching more than just technique.

Friedrich Burgmüller’s 25 Easy and Progressive Studies, Op. 100: A staple of piano pedagogy, these studies are beloved for their musicality and programmatic titles. Each piece focuses on a specific technical challenge (e.g., legato, staccato, arpeggios) while maintaining a charming, lyrical style.

(This article was generated by Gemini. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Jean-Michel Serres Apfel Café Music QR Codes Center English 2024.

Posted on

Notes on Je te veux by Erik Satie, Information, Analysis and Performance Tutorial

Overview

“Je te veux” (I Want You) is a sung waltz composed by French composer Erik Satie between 1897 and 1901. It is one of his most famous works and is often performed in both its original form (for voice and piano) and as a solo piano piece.

Context and Structure

Lyrics: The lyrics were written by Henry Pacory. They are both romantic and a little whimsical, expressing a passionate and playful desire. The main theme is an invitation to love, with lines like “Je te veux… Je te veux…” repeated as a refrain.

Music: Satie’s music is typical of his style at the time: simple, elegant, and a little melancholic. Although it’s a waltz, it lacks the exuberant dynamism of some Viennese waltzes. Instead, it is imbued with a certain nostalgia and a particular tenderness. The harmony is simple, but the emotion is palpable.

Reception and Legacy

“Je te veux” was a great success, initially in Parisian cabarets at the turn of the 20th century, where it was performed by popular singers. Its haunting melody and direct lyrics made it an immediate crowd favorite.

Today, the work is still widely performed and recorded. It is often associated with the image of a Belle Époque Paris, both elegant and bohemian. It perfectly embodies Satie’s duality: a composer capable of creating pieces of great apparent simplicity, yet charged with deep poetry and subtle emotion.

Musical Characteristics

Erik Satie’s “Je te veux” is a sung waltz distinguished by several musical characteristics that are representative of the composer’s unique style.

Form and Structure 🎼

The piece is a slow, sentimental waltz written in C major. Its structure is quite simple, following the model of a popular Parisian cabaret song. It alternates between a verse section and a catchy refrain.

Harmony and Melody 🎶

  • Harmony: The harmony is simple and stripped down, typical of Satie. It uses basic chords with a few touches of originality. Unlike many waltzes of the time that could be very flamboyant, Satie maintains a clear harmony, which gives a sense of delicacy and intimacy.
  • Melody: The melody is very lyrical and memorable. It is often played with a slight rubato, giving an impression of freedom and tenderness. In the solo piano versions, Satie added a central section (trio) that enriches the piece and provides a melodic contrast.

Rhythm and Accompaniment 🎹

  • Rhythm: The waltz rhythm is very present, with its moderate tempo and three-beat time signature. The piano accompaniment often follows the “oom-pah-pah” pattern of the waltz, but with great softness. The rhythmic execution is sometimes described as being more difficult than it seems due to the music’s apparent simplicity.
  • Accompaniment: The piano accompaniment is discreet, not seeking to steal the show from the melody. In the sung version, it supports the voice, while in the solo piano version, it creates a balance between the melodic line and the harmony, evoking a feeling of nostalgia.

Style, Movements, and Compositional Period

The style of Erik Satie’s “Je te veux” is a fascinating mix of several influences, but it primarily relates to the genre of Belle Époque Parisian cabaret and salon music.

Old or New? Traditional or Innovative? 🕰️

  • Both old and new: The waltz is an old dance form, but Satie uses it in his own unique way. He respects the traditional structure of the waltz, but the simplicity and subtlety of his harmony and melody set it apart from the more grandiose Viennese waltzes.
  • Traditional and innovative: The piece is traditional in its form (a slow waltz) and instrumentation (voice and piano). However, it is innovative in the clarity of its composition and the absence of excessive ornamentation. Satie simplifies the musical language, which was an idea far ahead of its time.

Form and Musical Trends 🎶

The music of “Je te veux” is primarily monophonic in its structure, with a clear and distinct melody accompanied by the piano. Although Satie explored modernist and neoclassical ideas later in his career, “Je te veux” does not directly belong to those movements. It is more accurately classified as:

  • Post-Romantic: The piece retains a romantic sensibility, but it breaks away from the emotional excesses and massive orchestration of late romanticism.
  • Impressionistic (with caution): Although Satie was a key figure for Impressionist composers like Claude Debussy, “Je te veux” does not have the harmonic richness and complexity of sound colors typical of Impressionism. Its clarity and simplicity place it on the margins of this movement.
  • Cabaret and Salon Music: This is the most appropriate category. Satie composed “Je te veux” for singer Paulette Darty, the “queen of the slow waltz,” and the work is an excellent example of the sophisticated popular music of the era. It’s a charming and sentimental melody, designed for an entertainment audience rather than a classical concert hall.

Analysis, Tutorial, Interpretation, and Key Performance Points

To play “Je te veux” on the piano, it is essential to understand Satie’s intention and the nuances of his style. Here is an analysis, interpretation advice, and important points for a successful performance.

Analysis and Structure of the Piece

  • A slow waltz: Unlike the fast and virtuosic waltzes of Strauss, “Je te veux” is a slow and intimate waltz. The tempo should be moderate, with a little rubato, which means the pianist can take slight liberties with the tempo to create a more personal and romantic expression.
  • Simple form: The piece follows a simple song structure with verses and a refrain. The memorable and lyrical main theme is repeated throughout the piece.
  • Stripped-down harmony: The harmony is clear and direct, without the complexity of Debussy’s or Ravel’s Impressionism. The chords are often simple (triads), which highlights the melody. It is a harmony that evokes tenderness, melancholy, and simplicity.

Interpretation Tips and Tutorial

The Melody (Right Hand):

  • Cantabile: The melody should be played with a singing touch (cantabile). Think of a singer expressing their desire with elegance and a little nostalgia.
  • Musical line: Avoid playing each note as an isolated entity. Create a fluid musical line, with well-defined phrases. The main notes are important, but the passing notes should be delicate.
  • Nuances: Satie was not very precise about nuances, but indications like “Modéré” (Moderate) and “avec douceur” (with sweetness) can guide you. Vary the dynamics to give life to the melody. A gradual crescendo on an ascending phrase, a diminuendo on a descending phrase.

The Accompaniment (Left Hand):

  • Waltz rhythm: The left hand provides the “oom-pah-pah” waltz rhythm. The first note of each measure, often the bass, should be played with a little more weight to mark the beat, but without being hammered. The other two notes of the chord should be light and soft.
  • Discretion: The accompaniment should remain discreet so as not to overwhelm the melody. The left hand’s role is to support, not to dominate.

The Pedal:

  • Clarity: Use the pedal sparingly to avoid blurring the harmonies. Excessive use could turn Satie’s clarity into a sonic haze.
  • One pedal per measure: A common technique is to use the pedal once per measure, lifting and depressing it on the first beat of the next measure. This allows the notes in the left hand to be linked while maintaining the sharpness of the harmony.

Important Points for Performing the Piece

  • Feeling above all: Technique is less crucial than expression. “Je te veux” is a piece of feeling. Satie is the composer of subtle emotion, delicate irony, and poetic melancholy. The interpretation must reflect this sensibility.
  • Sway and elegance: The piece is a salon waltz. You must imagine a couple dancing with elegance and a certain restraint. The rhythmic swaying should be fluid and graceful.
  • The Belle Époque atmosphere: Think of the context of the piece: the cabarets, the Parisian salons of the early 20th century. It is music that is both popular and refined, evoking a nostalgia for a bygone era.

In summary, to play “Je te veux” well, you should not seek virtuosity, but musicality. Focus on the softness of the sound, the clarity of the melody, and the elegance of the rhythm. The most successful interpretation will be one that conveys Satie’s simple charm and melancholic poetry.

History

The history of “Je te veux” is closely linked to Erik Satie’s life and the artistic excitement of Belle Époque Paris. At the turn of the 20th century, Satie was still a relatively little-known composer, living modestly and earning a living as a pianist in the cabarets and café-concerts of Montmartre. It was in this popular entertainment environment that he rubbed shoulders with many artists and singers of the time.

It was in this context that he met the singer Paulette Darty, a cabaret star nicknamed the “queen of the slow waltz.” Satie, who accompanied her on piano for a time, was inspired by her style. He therefore composed this sentimental waltz for her, with lyrics written by his friend Henry Pacory.

The composition was likely completed around 1897, although it was not registered with SACEM until 1902 and published in 1903. The premiere of the piece by Paulette Darty at La Scala, a Parisian cabaret, was an immediate success. The catchy melody and the lyrics, which were both romantic and mischievous, won over the public.

This work, far from the complexity of some of his other pieces, was a popular song in the noblest sense of the term. It was music intended for entertainment, but it bore Satie’s inimitable mark: a clarity and elegance that distinguished it from the output of the time.

“Je te veux” remained a popular success long after its creation and was performed by many singers, including Yvonne George in the 1920s. It became one of Satie’s most famous works, and its melody has endured, embodying a certain spirit of old Paris—a mix of lightness, tenderness, and sweet melancholy.

Was it a Hit Piece or Collection at the Time?

“Je te veux” was a great success at the time of its release, particularly in the environment where it was born and first performed.

A Popular and Immediate Success

The piece, premiered in 1903 by singer Paulette Darty at La Scala in Paris, was an immediate success in café-concerts and cabarets. The slow, melancholic, and sentimental waltz, which was also flirtatious and sensual, found its audience perfectly in Belle Époque Paris. Satie, who was going through a difficult period, found in these “caf’ conc’” creations a way to make ends meet, and “Je te veux” was one of his greatest popular successes. It helped establish Satie as a composer capable of reaching a wide audience beyond avant-garde circles.

The Sale of Sheet Music

The success of the song naturally led to good sheet music sales. At that time, the sale of piano sheet music was a key indicator of a musical work’s popularity. Bourgeois families and music lovers bought these scores to play at home. The 1903 edition, published by Bellon, Ponscarme et Cie., was successful enough to be reissued later.

The popularity of “Je te veux” was therefore both a performance success on stage and a commercial success, making it one of Satie’s most famous and lucrative works during his lifetime.

Episodes and Anecdotes

  • The inspiration of the “queen of the slow waltz”: Satie was particularly inspired by the singer Paulette Darty, nicknamed the “queen of the slow waltz.” He accompanied her on the piano and was fascinated by her style, which was both elegant and sensual. “Je te veux” was written specifically for her, capturing the essence of her art.

  • A melody for a Japanese video game: One of the most surprising anecdotes is the resurgence of the melody in the 1980s. The main theme of “Je te veux” was used as background music for the Japanese video game “Binary Land” (1985), developed by Hudson Soft for the NES console. This use introduced Satie’s music to a generation of gamers who knew nothing about the French composer.

  • The orchestration tribute: Although the original version is for voice and piano, Satie himself created an orchestral version, which was played in cabarets. This slightly more elaborate version shows that Satie took his entertainment music seriously and did not consider it a minor work.

  • Music for cinema: “Je te veux” has been used in many films, from Werner Schroeter’s “Miroir d’Enfant” (1993) to Sofia Coppola’s “Marie-Antoinette” (2006). These film uses show the music’s ability to evoke an atmosphere, a feeling of nostalgia, and to embody a certain image of French elegance.

  • Irony and success: Satie, known for his eccentricity and sense of humor, often had a complicated relationship with his own success. “Je te veux,” which was one of his most popular works during his lifetime, contrasted with his more experimental and obscure compositions. It is possible that Satie viewed the commercial success of this piece with a certain irony, as he had always considered himself an avant-garde artist.

  • A vital source of income: “Je te veux” was more than just a work of art; it was also a vital source of income for Satie during a period when he was living in great poverty. The copyright royalties from this waltz helped support his life, a fact that contrasts sharply with the image of the accursed composer sometimes associated with him.

  • A two-fold legacy: The piece is famous for both its sung version and its instrumental version, which has become a standard in the piano repertoire. This dual existence shows how strong the melody is and how it is capable of standing on its own, even without the lyrics.

Similar Compositions

When looking for compositions similar to Erik Satie’s “Je te veux,” you can explore several avenues, both within Satie’s own works and with other composers. The idea is to find works that share certain characteristics: a sentimental character, a clear and lyrical melody, writing for piano or for voice and piano, and a certain elegance that recalls the Belle Époque.

Works by Erik Satie

The most obvious similarity is found in Satie’s other works, particularly those he wrote for the cabaret:

  • “La Diva de l’Empire”: This march-song, also very popular, shares an upbeat side and a Parisian music-hall atmosphere with “Je te veux.”
  • “Trois valses distinguées du précieux dégoûté” (Three distinguished waltzes of the bored dandy): These waltzes have a humorous title, typical of Satie, but their music is both nostalgic and delicate. They capture a certain poetry of the waltz, without excessive sentimentalism.
  • “Tendrement”: Another sung waltz by Satie, which shares the same spirit of romance and sweetness as “Je te veux,” with an equally memorable melody.

Other Composers

For other composers, you can look into French music of the same period and in the genre of the mélodie (art song):

  • Francis Poulenc: A 20th-century composer, Poulenc’s style sometimes recalls Satie’s in its simplicity and clarity. His song “Les chemins de l’amour” is a slow and lyrical waltz, which evokes the same atmosphere as “Je te veux.”
  • Claude Debussy: Although more rooted in Impressionism, Debussy wrote piano pieces that share a certain lyricism with Satie, such as “La fille aux cheveux de lin” (prelude) or “Clair de lune.” The fluidity and poetry of these pieces are common points.
  • Gabriel Fauré: Fauré is a master of the French mélodie. Pieces like “Après un rêve” or “Les Berceaux” have a long and expressive melodic line that can recall Satie’s delicacy, although Fauré’s harmonic language is richer.
  • Edith Piaf: Although later, the music of Edith Piaf, particularly songs like “La Vie en rose” or “Non, je ne regrette rien,” shares a certain Parisian sensibility and a side that is both romantic and melancholic, which is in the lineage of Belle Époque cabaret music.

(This article was generated by Gemini. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Jean-Michel Serres Apfel Café Music QR Codes Center English 2024.

Posted on

Notes on 9 Children’s Pieces, EG 103 (1897) by Edvard Grieg: Information, Analysis and Performance Tutorial

General Overview

Edvard Grieg’s “9 Children’s Pieces,” EG 103, is a set of piano pieces composed in 1897. The collection is notable for its simplicity and charm, making it accessible to intermediate-level pianists. The pieces are a testament to Grieg’s ability to create a sense of Norwegian musical identity, even in smaller, more intimate works.

A general overview of the pieces is as follows:

The collection consists of nine short pieces for solo piano.

The titles, often in both Norwegian and German, suggest a range of moods and images, such as “The Pearl,” “Prayer,” “Loss,” and “A dream.”

The musical style is characteristic of Grieg’s Romanticism, incorporating lyrical melodies, rich harmonies, and a focus on expressing emotion and atmosphere.

Although intended for a younger audience or as pedagogical pieces, they are not simplistic, and they display the composer’s harmonic and melodic inventiveness.

The set is a good example of Grieg’s use of short, evocative piano pieces, a form he frequently explored, most famously in his larger collection of “Lyric Pieces.”

List of Pieces

1 Andante, Ruhig feierlich (Andante, Calm and solemn)

2 Perlen / The Pearl

3 Ved Gellerts grav / At Gellert’s Grave

4 Bønn / Prayer

5 Tap / Loss

6 Femårsdagen / The fifth Anniversary

7 Allegretto con moto (Moderately fast, with motion)

8 Scherzo

9 En drøm / A dream

Characteristics of Music

Edvard Grieg’s “9 Children’s Pieces,” EG 103, showcases many of his signature musical characteristics on a smaller scale, making them a great introduction to his style. The collection, though intended for pedagogical use, is a microcosm of Grieg’s broader Romantic and nationalistic tendencies.

Here are some of the key musical characteristics of the collection:

Lyrical Melodies and Emotional Depth: Grieg was a master melodist, and these pieces are no exception. They often feature simple, song-like melodies that are deeply expressive and evocative of a wide range of emotions, from the solemnity of “Prayer” to the whimsicality of other pieces. This is a defining trait of his Romantic style, which prioritized personal feeling and expression.

Harmonic Innovation: Grieg’s harmonic language is a hallmark of his music, and he displays it even in these brief works. He uses colorful and often surprising chord progressions, including chromaticism and unusual modulations. This innovative harmony adds depth and a sense of mystery or tension to the music, foreshadowing the Impressionist composers who would follow him.

Norwegian Folk Influence: As a nationalist composer, Grieg’s music is deeply rooted in the folk traditions of Norway. While not explicitly quoting folk tunes in this collection, he often incorporates the rhythms, modes (like the Dorian and Lydian modes), and melodic contours of Norwegian folk music. This gives the pieces a distinctive, national flavor that connects them to the landscapes and culture of his homeland.

Miniature Form and Structure: Grieg excelled in writing short, “character pieces,” and this collection is a prime example. Each piece is a concise musical snapshot, often following a simple structure like ABA. The brevity and clear form make them highly accessible for performers and listeners, proving that powerful expression does not require a large-scale composition.

Variety of Moods: The titles of the pieces hint at the diverse moods Grieg explores. He moves from the quiet and reflective (“The Pearl,” “At Gellert’s Grave”) to the more energetic and playful (“Scherzo”). This emotional range, from melancholy to joy, is a central part of Grieg’s Romantic sensibility.

In summary, “9 Children’s Pieces” is a charming and accessible collection that effectively represents Grieg’s musical personality: lyrical and emotionally resonant, harmonically inventive, and deeply connected to his Norwegian heritage, all within the elegant framework of the short piano piece.

Style(s), Movement(s) and Period of Composition

Edvard Grieg’s “9 Children’s Pieces,” EG 103, is a work of the late Romantic period, composed in 1897. To understand its style, it’s helpful to break down the different aspects you’ve asked about:

Old or New at that time?
At the time of its composition, the music of Grieg was considered a part of the established, though still evolving, late Romantic tradition. While his harmonic language was often fresh and forward-looking, it was not as radically “new” as the music of his contemporaries who were pushing into modernism, like Debussy or Schoenberg. Grieg’s music was a culmination and refinement of Romanticism rather than a total break from it.

Traditional or Innovative?
The music is a blend of both. It is traditional in its use of established forms and structures (like the character piece) and its reliance on Romantic expressive ideals. However, it is innovative in its harmonic palette and its deep integration of Norwegian folk idioms. Grieg’s unique blend of modal harmonies, chromaticism, and folk-inspired melodic fragments made his sound distinctive and influential on later composers, particularly those associated with Impressionism.

Polyphony or Monophony?
The music is neither strictly monophonic nor polyphonic, but rather homophonic with polyphonic elements. The dominant texture is a clear, lyrical melody supported by chordal accompaniment. This is typical of the Romantic style, which prioritized a single, expressive melodic line. However, Grieg often uses counter-melodies or inner voices that create a richer, more polyphonic texture, though the primary focus remains on the main melody.

Classicism, Romantic, Nationalism, Impressionism, Post-Romantic or Modernism?
The most accurate classifications for Grieg’s style in this collection are:

Romantic: This is the overarching style. The pieces are highly expressive, emotionally driven, and focused on lyrical melody and rich harmony.

Nationalism: Grieg was a central figure in the Norwegian nationalist movement in music. While not explicitly quoting folk songs in this collection, the influence is deeply felt in the melodic contours, rhythms, and modal harmonies that evoke a distinctly Norwegian character. This is one of the most important aspects of his style.

Post-Romanticism (or Late Romanticism): The term “Post-Romantic” can be used, but it’s more accurate to describe Grieg as a late Romantic composer. While his music pushed harmonic boundaries, it didn’t fully enter the dis-harmony and atonality that characterizes much of true Post-Romanticism or Modernism.

Impressionism: Grieg is often seen as a precursor to Impressionism. His use of colorful, non-functional harmonies and his focus on creating atmosphere and mood over traditional structural development were highly influential on composers like Debussy and Ravel. While not an Impressionist himself, his harmonic language laid the groundwork for the movement.

In summary, “9 Children’s Pieces” is a quintessential example of Norwegian late Romanticism. It’s a blend of traditional Romantic forms with innovative harmonies and a strong nationalistic flavor, foreshadowing the textural and atmospheric interests of Impressionism.

Analysis, Tutorial, Interpretation & Important Points to Play

Analyzing and interpreting Edvard Grieg’s “9 Children’s Pieces,” EG 103, for a pianist requires attention to the subtle details of his style. While the pieces are relatively short and technically accessible for late intermediate players, they are full of musical and emotional nuances that require careful consideration.

Here is an analysis and some important points for playing the collection:

General Analysis and Interpretation
Evocative Titles: Grieg’s titles are not just labels; they are a direct guide to the emotional and pictorial content of each piece. “The Pearl” suggests something precious and delicate, “Prayer” requires a solemn and introspective mood, and “A dream” should be played with a certain dreamy, otherworldly quality. Always consider the title as your starting point for interpretation.

Rhythmic Nuances: While the rhythms may seem straightforward, Grieg’s music often has a flexible, almost improvisational feel. Pay close attention to subtle tempo fluctuations, rubato, and the way the music “breathes.” This is a key characteristic of Romantic music and a crucial element of Grieg’s style.

Harmonic Color: Grieg’s use of harmony is one of the most distinctive features of his music. Don’t just play the notes; listen for the color of each chord. Notice how he uses modal harmonies (often evoking Norwegian folk music) and chromaticism to create unexpected and beautiful sounds. The balance between the melody and the supporting harmony is critical.

Pedaling: The use of the pedal is essential for capturing the lush, resonant sound of Grieg’s music. The pedal can be used to sustain harmonies, create a wash of sound, and connect melodic phrases. However, be careful not to over-pedal, which can make the music sound muddy. Use your ear to find the right balance, especially in the more delicate passages.

Important Points for Playing Piano
“Andante, Ruhig feierlich” (Calm and solemn):

Interpretation: Focus on a rich, full, and legato sound. The mood is serious and noble.

Playing Tips: Pay attention to the voicing. The melody should sing out over the accompanying chords. Use a deep, warm touch and a steady tempo, allowing for subtle tempo changes at phrase endings.

“Perlen” (The Pearl):

Interpretation: This piece is delicate and lyrical. Think of the quiet beauty and shimmering quality of a pearl.

Playing Tips: A light, clean touch is crucial. The arpeggiated figures should be played with a pearl-like evenness. The melody should be shaped carefully, with a gentle rise and fall.

“Ved Gellerts grav” (At Gellert’s Grave):

Interpretation: The mood is somber and reflective, like a quiet moment of remembrance.

Playing Tips: This piece requires a sensitive touch and dynamic control. The chords should be played with a soft, yet resonant sound. The bass line needs to be grounded and steady, like the tolling of a bell.

“Bønn” (Prayer):

Interpretation: A very expressive and heartfelt piece. The mood is one of sincere devotion and contemplation.

Playing Tips: This is a great piece for working on legato touch and singing tone. The melody in the right hand must be played with a beautiful, sustained quality. The left hand accompaniment should be quiet and supportive, never overpowering the melody.

“Tap” (Loss):

Interpretation: A melancholy and mournful piece. The title speaks for itself.

Playing Tips: The texture is often sparse, so every note counts. The dissonances and chromaticisms should be brought out for their emotional impact. The tempo should be slow and deliberate, with a sense of grief and quiet despair.

“Femårsdagen” (The fifth Anniversary):

Interpretation: A sudden shift in mood to something joyful and celebratory. This is a bright and festive piece.

Playing Tips: The fast tempo requires clean and precise articulation. The music should be lively and energetic, with a strong rhythmic drive. The dynamic contrast between forte and piano sections should be clear and effective.

“Allegretto con moto”:

Interpretation: A dance-like piece with a lively, yet gentle character. It has a folk-like simplicity.

Playing Tips: Focus on a clear and bouncy touch. The left hand provides a consistent rhythmic foundation, while the right hand plays a charming, lilting melody.

“Scherzo”:

Interpretation: This is a playful and mischievous piece. It’s full of surprises and quick, light passages.

Playing Tips: The most technically demanding piece in the set. It requires a light, quick touch, with brilliant, fast scale and arpeggio passages. The dynamic shifts and accents are crucial for capturing the “scherzo” character.

“En drøm” (A dream):

Interpretation: The final piece is a beautiful, peaceful, and introspective farewell. It should sound like a cherished memory or a sweet, fading dream.

Playing Tips: A sustained, soft touch is needed. The tempo should be relaxed, with a lot of rubato to give it a free, dream-like quality. The harmonies are particularly rich in this piece, so listen carefully to the blends of sound.

By approaching each piece with a combination of technical precision and artistic sensitivity to Grieg’s unique musical language, a pianist can truly bring this wonderful collection to life.

History

Edvard Grieg composed the “9 Children’s Pieces,” EG 103, in 1897. The collection, though not assigned an opus number by Grieg himself, is part of a body of work that showcases his lifelong dedication to composing for the piano. As a pianist and a teacher, Grieg understood the importance of accessible yet musically rewarding pieces for students.

The creation of these pieces came at a time when Grieg, in his mid-50s, was a celebrated national hero in Norway and a major figure in European music. He had already composed many of his most famous works, including the Piano Concerto and the Peer Gynt suites. However, he never stopped writing short, intimate works for the piano, a form in which he excelled.

“9 Children’s Pieces” can be seen in the context of Grieg’s larger collection of “Lyric Pieces,” which he composed over a span of several decades. Both collections demonstrate his mastery of the musical miniature—short, character-driven works that are filled with melody, emotion, and harmonic color. While the “Lyric Pieces” are generally more complex, the “Children’s Pieces” share the same aesthetic and are an ideal entry point into Grieg’s world for younger or less advanced pianists.

The collection was likely intended for pedagogical purposes, but it’s important to note that Grieg didn’t “dumb down” his style for children. Instead, he distilled his musical language into a more concise and direct form. The pieces, with their clear structures and evocative titles, serve as a bridge between the technical demands of a piano student and the artistic expression of a mature composer.

The history of the collection is not tied to any grand event or personal tragedy, but rather to Grieg’s continuous artistic output and his deep connection to the piano. It stands as a quiet testament to his belief that even the simplest music can be imbued with profound beauty and national character.

Episodes & Trivia

“9 Children’s Pieces,” EG 103, by Edvard Grieg is not a work that is steeped in dramatic historical episodes or widespread public trivia like some of his more famous pieces. However, its creation and context still hold some interesting details.

Here are a few tidbits about the collection:

A Dedication to a Young Student: The collection is dedicated to “Fräulein Ludovisca Riis.” This dedication to a specific young woman suggests that the pieces were not just an abstract idea but were likely written with a particular student in mind. This connection to a real person reinforces the pedagogical purpose of the collection.

A Work of Grieg’s “Indian Summer”: The collection was composed in 1897, a period in Grieg’s life when he was a mature and internationally recognized composer. It’s often referred to as a work from his “Indian summer,” a time when he was still composing actively, but perhaps with less of the youthful fire of his earlier works. Instead, these pieces show a composer at peace, distilling his musical language into its most elegant and expressive forms.

A Glimpse into Grieg’s Nationalism: Although the pieces are intended for children, they are infused with Grieg’s deep sense of Norwegian nationalism. He uses the modal harmonies and rhythmic patterns that are characteristic of Norwegian folk music, even without directly quoting a specific folk tune. This demonstrates how deeply ingrained his national identity was in his musical language, even when writing on a small, intimate scale.

A Link to Robert Schumann: Grieg was a great admirer of Robert Schumann, and his music, particularly his piano works, shows a strong influence. Schumann’s “Kinderszenen” (Scenes from Childhood) is an obvious antecedent to Grieg’s “Children’s Pieces.” Both composers created collections of short, character-driven works that explored the world of childhood with emotional depth and sensitivity, rather than just technical exercises. Grieg’s collection can be seen as a Norwegian response to this German tradition.

A Work Not Given an Opus Number: Grieg was meticulous about organizing his published works with opus numbers. However, he didn’t assign one to “9 Children’s Pieces.” This is not an indicator of its quality, but it does suggest that he viewed it as a more personal or pedagogical project, separate from his major published works like the “Lyric Pieces” or sonatas. The “EG 103” is part of the “EG” catalog, which was compiled posthumously to organize his works without opus numbers.

Similar Compositions / Suits / Collections

Edvard Grieg’s “9 Children’s Pieces,” EG 103, belongs to a tradition of composing short, descriptive piano pieces for pedagogical and home use, a trend that flourished during the Romantic era. These collections are known for their lyrical melodies, expressive moods, and accessible technical demands, making them ideal for developing pianists.

Here are some similar compositions, suites, or collections that share these characteristics:

From the Romantic Era:

Robert Schumann, Kinderszenen (Scenes from Childhood), Op. 15: This is arguably the most famous and influential collection of this type. Composed nearly 60 years before Grieg’s, it’s a set of thirteen evocative pieces, including the beloved “Träumerei.” Like Grieg’s work, it focuses on capturing moods and images from childhood with great tenderness and emotional depth.

Robert Schumann, Album für die Jugend (Album for the Young), Op. 68: This collection is more overtly pedagogical than Kinderszenen, with pieces arranged in increasing order of difficulty. It includes pieces like “The Wild Horseman” and “The Happy Farmer,” offering a wide range of musical characters and technical challenges for students.

Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, Album for the Young, Op. 39: Tchaikovsky’s collection is a Russian counterpart to Schumann’s. It contains twenty-four pieces, each with a descriptive title, ranging from “Morning Prayer” to “The Hurdy-Gurdy Man.” The pieces are filled with Tchaikovsky’s characteristic melodic grace and dramatic flair.

Felix Mendelssohn, Lieder ohne Worte (Songs Without Words): While not specifically for children, these short, lyrical pieces are a cornerstone of the Romantic miniature. They are a great example of the Romantic ideal of creating a “song” for the piano, a quality that is very present in Grieg’s work.

From the Late Romantic and Early 20th Century:

Edward MacDowell, Woodland Sketches, Op. 51: This collection of ten short pieces by the American composer is a late-Romantic masterpiece. It is highly descriptive, with titles like “To a Wild Rose” and “To a Water-lily,” and is full of rich harmony and evocative imagery, much like Grieg’s music.

Dmitri Kabalevsky, 24 Pieces for Children, Op. 39: Moving into the 20th century, Kabalevsky’s work is a modern classic of pedagogical piano music. While the harmonic language is more modern than Grieg’s, the pieces are still character-driven and beautifully written, with titles like “A Little Fable” and “Dance.”

Béla Bartók, For Children: Bartók’s collection is a unique and important contribution to the genre. It’s a series of short, accessible pieces based on Hungarian and Slovak folk tunes. This collection is a fantastic example of a composer using folk music as the foundation for pedagogical works, a practice Grieg also embraced.

(This article was generated by Gemini. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Jean-Michel Serres Apfel Café Music QR Codes Center English 2024.