Timeline of Entire History of Philosophy

Homer (Late 8th or early 7th century BC)

Hesiod (between 750 – 650 BC) Theogony

Thales of Miletus (626/623 – 548/545 BC, Ionian/Milesian School, Naturalism)

Anaximander (610 – 546 BC, Ionian/Milesian School, Naturalism)

Pythagoras (570 – 495 BC, Italian/Pythagorean)

Xenophanes (570 – 475 BC, Italian)

Heraclitus (535 – 475 BC, Ionian/Ephesian)

Parmenides (515 – 450? BC, Italian/Eleatic)

Zeno of Elea (495 – 430 BC, Italian/Eleatic)

Empedocles (494 – 434 BC, Pluralist)

Anaxagoras (510 – 428 BC, Pluralist, Natural Philosophy)

Protagoras (490 – 420 BC, Sophist)

Democritus (460 – 370 BC, Atomism, Materialism)

Socrates (470 – 399 BC)

399 BC – Socrates was executed by drinking hemlock. His pupil Plato watched it.

387 BC – Plato (428/427 or 424/423 – 348/347 BC) founded the Academy.

335 BC – Aristotle (384 – 322 BC) founded Lyceum.

Pyrrho (360 – 270 BC, Pyrrhonism, Skepticism)

Epicurus (341 – 270 BC, Epicureanism)

Zeno of Citium (334 – 262 BC, founder of the Greek Stoic school)

Cicero (106 – 43 BC, Academic Skepticism, Roman Stoicism)

Lucretius (99 – 55 BC, Epicureanism, Atomism, Materialism)

Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4 BC – AD 65, Roman Stoicism)

Epictetus (50 – 135, Roman Stoicism)

Marcus Aurelius (121 – 180, Roman Stoicism)

Plotinus (205 – 280, Neoplatonism) The Enneads

400 – Confessions by Augustine of Hippo (354 – 430, Augustinianism, Neoplatonism)

413 – 427 – City of God by Augustine

523 – The Consolation of Philosophy by Flavius Boethius (480? – 524, Neoplatonism)

1265 – 1273 – Summa Theologica by Thomas Aquinas (1224 – 1274, Scholasticism)

1513 – The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli (Renaissance philosophy, Classical realism, Republicanism)

1517 – Ninety-five Theses by Martin Luther (1483 – 1546)

1520 – On the Freedom of a Christian by Luther

1580 – Essais by Michel de Montaigne (1533 – 1592, Renaissance humanism, Renaissance skepticism)

1618 – Novum Organum by Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626, Renaissance philosophy, Empiricism)

1637 – Discourse on the Method by René Descartes (1596 – 1650, Continental rationalism)

1641 – Meditation on the First Philosophy by Descartes

1651 – Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes (1588 – 1679, Social contract, Classic realism, Empiricism)

1670 – Pansées by Blaise Pascal (1623 – 1662, Jansenism, Christian humanism)

1677 – Ethics by Baruch Spinoza (1632 -1677, Continental rationalism, Monism)

1689 – A Letter Concerning Toleration, Two Treatises of Government by John Locke (1632 – 1704, Empiricism, Social contract, Liberalism)

1690 – An Essay Concerning Human Understanding by Locke

1709 – An Essay towards a New Theory of Vision by George Berkeley (1685 – 1753, Empiricism, Subjective idealism)

1710 – A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge by Berkeley

1714 – Monadology by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646 – 1716, Continental rationalism, Relationalism)

1748 – An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding by David Hume (1711 – 1776, Empiricism, Skepticism)

1750 – Discourse on the Arts and Sciences by Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712 – 1778, Enlightenment, Social contract, Romanticism)

1754 – Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men by Rousseau

1755 – Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804, German idealism, Transcendental idealism) began lecturing at the University of Königsberg.

1762 – The Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right by Rousseau

1763 – Treatise on Tolerance by Voltaire (1694 – 1778, Lumières, Philosophes, Deism)

1770 – Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) became a professor of the University of Königsberg.

1780 – An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation by Jeremy Bentham (1748 – 1832, Utilitarianism)

1781 – Critique of Pure Reason (1st edition) by Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804)

1788 – Critique of Practical Reason by Kant

1790 – Critique of Judgment by Kant

1794/1795 – Foundations of the Science of Knowledge by Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762 – 1814, German idealism)

1800 – System of Transcendental Idealism by Friedrich Schelling (1775 – 1854, German idealism, Natural philosophy)

1807 – The Phenomenology of Spirit by Georg Hegel (1770 – 1831, German idealism, Absolute idealism)

1809 – Philosophical Inquiries into the Essence of Human Freedom by Schelling (Identity philosophy)

1817 – Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences by Hegel (German idealism, Absolute idealism)

1830 – 1842 Course of Positive Philosophy by Auguste Comte (1798 – 1857, Positivism)

1831 – Hegel died.

1841 – Schelling returned to the lecture on the Berlin University. (Jena Romanticism, Positive philosophy)

1844 – The World as Will and Representation by Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 – 1860, Metaphysical voluntarism, Philosophical pessimism)

1848 – Manifesto of the Communist Party by Karl Marx (1813 – 1883) & Friedrich Engels (1820 – 1895)

1849 – The Sickness Unto Death by Søren Kierkegaard (1813 – 1855, Christian existentialism)

1859 – On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin (1809 – 1882, Science of evolution)

1862 – First Principles by Herbert Spencer (1820 – 1903, Positivism, Evolutionism, Social Darwinism)

1867 – Capital. Volume I by Karl Marx (Historical materialism, Marxism)

1872 – The Birth of Tragedy by Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 – 1900, Philosophy of life, Anti-nihilism, Perspectivism)

1884 – The Foundations of Arithmetic by Gottlob Frege (1848 – 1925, Analytic philosophy, Philosophy of mathematics, Mathematical logic)

1885 – Capital. Volume II by Karl Marx

1886 – Beyond Good and Evil by Nietzsche

1900 – The Philosophy of Money by Georg Simmel (1858 – 1918, Philosophy of life, Neo-Kantianism)

1911 – An Inquiry into the Good by Kitaro Nishida (1870 – 1945, Kyoto School, Meontology)

1913 – Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology by Edmund Husserl (1859 – 1938, Phenomenology)

1916 – Husserl transferred to the University of Freiburg. Heidegger met Husserl and during 1920 and 1923, Heidegger was served as an assistant of Husserl.

1921 – Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889 – 1951, Philosophy of language, Correspondence theory of truth, Logical positivism)

1927 – Being and Time by Martin Heidegger (1889 – 1976, Existentialism, Existential phenomenology)

1928 – Heidegger became a Professor of the University of Freiburg, successor to Husserl.

1929 – Process and Reality by Alfred North Whitehead (1861 – 1947, Process philosophy, Process theology)

1933 – Heidegger was elected rector of the University of Freiburg in April 1933, but he resigned in April 1934.

1935 – The Logic of Scientific Discovery by Karl Popper (1902 – 1994, Analytic philosophy, Critical rationalism)

1936 – The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology by Husserl

1942 – The Structure of Behavior by Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1908 – 1961, Phenomenology, Embodied phenomenology)

1944 – Dialectic of Enlightenment by Theodor Adorno (1903 – 1969) & Max Horkheimer (1895 – 1973) (Frankfurt School, Critical theory)

1945 – The Open Society and Its Enemies by Popper

Phenomenology of Perception by Merleau-Ponty

1947 – Introduction to the Reading of Hegel by Alexandre Kojève (1902 – 1968, Neo-Hegelianism, Existential phenomenology)

1949 – The Need for Roots by Simone Weil (1909 – 1943, Christian socialism, Modern Platonism)

1953 – Philosophical Investigations by Wittgenstein (Philosophy of language, Ordinary language philosophy)

Introduction to Metaphysics by Heidegger

1954 – The Question Concerning Technology by Heidegger

1958 – The Human Condition by Hannah Arendt (1906 – 1975, Political philosophy)

1959 – Discourse On Thinking by Heidegger

1960 – Truth and Method by Hans-Georg Gadamer (1900 – 2002, Hermeneutics, Hermeneutic phenomenology)

1961 – Totality and Infinity by Emmanuel Levinas (1906 – 1995, Phenomenology, Jewish philosophy)

1962 – The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere by Jürgen Habermas (1929 – , Frankfurt School)

1965 – For Marx by Louis Althusser (1918 – 1990, Structural Marxism)

1966 – The Order of Things by Michel Foucault (1926- 1984, Structuralism)

1967 – Of Grammatology, Speech and Phenomena by Jacques Derrida (1930 – 2004, Post-structuralism, Deconstruction)

1972 – Anti-Oedipus by Gilles Deleuze (1925 – 1995) & Félix Guattari (1930 – 1992) (Post-structuralism, Postmodernism)

1980 – A Thousand Plateaus by Deleuze & Guattari

1981 – The Theory of Communicative Action by Habermas

Related Posts and Pages

Philosophy / Philosophie

A Definition of Philosophy

A Definition of Ethics

Philosophy of Socrates

Plato’s Theory of Ideas

Philosophy of Aristotle

Philosophy of René Descartes

Spinoza’s Monism

Leibniz’s Monadology

Locke’s Empiricist Epistemology

Wittgenstein’s Language Game

Structuralism

Book Review | Novelist as a Profession by Haruki Murakami, Switch Publishing, 2015

Novelist as a Profession by Haruki Murakami is an auto-biographical essay (on the afterword, mentioned by Murakami). This essay treats themes of novelist, novel, literature, writing, art, school education and life. On this essay Murakami told how he lived, spent his life, wrote novels, think about literature and novel. Anyway, as a result, for readers, this essay Murakami told readers how to write novel and induced them to write a novel. But it is not a usual “how to” book or a guide book at all.

On this essay, Murakami wrote honestly his experience, way of life, thought and policy. He didn’t want to be a novelist seriously. At first, he had no enthusiasm to write novel. He ran a jazz cafe or bar, and earned a sufficient amount of money. Some epiphanies, chances and lucks made him a novelist. Also he continued to write novels of his own will.

Murakami is an ordinary and modest person, also is uncategorized and unconventional individual. He was a usual student, spent a daily life as an ordinary and normal citizen. Also he isn’t a stereotyped great writer or artist.

Murakami’s policy is such as a policy of non-policy or non-rule. He live and write by spontaneousness, freedom and nature. He doesn’t depend on any authorities, academism and large systems. He live his life the way he like. He doesn’t interest in any prizes and the Japanese literature scene. So he migrated to foreign countries, and made a distance to the Japanese literature scene.

His policy links to his way of writing and the content of his works. He writes his novels the way he like. He writes a novel by rhythm and free improvisation like jazz. He doesn’t set a heavy and proper theme, a strict plan and fixed personalities of characters. His policy and way of writing made the “voice” echoes with the hearts of readers.

Murakami wrote his novels for himself, “writing for enjoy myself as my basic stance” (p. 269). So the title of a novel by an imaginary writer Derek Heartfield in Murakami’s debut novel Hear the Wind Sing is “What’s Wrong About Feeling Good ?” (p. 270), it expressed the sense of incongruity to the Japanese literature scene.

Murakami has been enjoyed writing and wrote by his spontaneousness from his debut until now. And he has no desire to become a novelist or to succeed in a novel, and there’s any limitations. He alway wrote a novel by a plentiful and spontaneous pleasure. So he can own “a natural feeling that I’m free” and “free and natural feeling” (p. 111), and he thinks his originality caused by freedom.

On the other hand, Murakami has will and durability to write story, and his original way of work. He had been built his own style of writing and his original grand narrative by trial and error. When he write a long novel 5 hours in early morning everyday. And he trains the body and keeps his physical strength without fail. He founded healthy life for writing. He thinks to complete a long novel it’s necessary of concentration and durability.

Murakami is only a novelist and a creator. He isn’t good at analyse and criticize things like a scholar, also he want not his works analysed and criticized by scholars and critics. He won’t be a councillor or a literature prize, also he isn’t interested in any prizes. Over almost 40 years, he only wrote novels and texts. He only want to enjoy writing a novel. Murakami thinks he is only an ordinary person has a certain measure of capacity to write a novel, but by some chances and accidents made him a novelist, and by his will and durability he continued to write novels. I think Murakami told that “everyone can write a novel and become a novelist”. As a matter of fact, by this book, you should want to write a novel or create something.

A spring clear afternoon, Murakami visited the 1978 opening game of the Central League at an outfield stand of the Jingu Stadium, Tokyo. When the first batter of Yakult Swallows, Dave Hilton hit a fine double, an epiphany fell into Murakami, then he realized “That’s it, maybe, I can write a novel !” at the moment. (pp. 46 – 47) This essay makes you want to write a novel or want to do a creation. Like Murakami realized “That’s it, maybe, I can write a novel !”, to read this essay, you may realize “That’s it, maybe, I can write a novel !”.

Product Details

Novelist as a Profession
Haruki Murakami
Switch Publishing, Tokyo, 10 September 2015
313 pages, JPY 1944
ISBN 9784884184438
Content

  1. Are Novelists Tolerant Persons?
  2. When I Became a Novelist
  3. About Literature Awards
  4. On Originality
  5. Well, What Should I Write?
  6. Taking Side with Time: To Write Long Novels
  7. Extremely Individual and Physical Activity
  8. About School
  9. How Characters That I Should Present?
  10. Who is I Write for?
  11. Going Abroad: The New Frontier
  12. Place a Story Is in: Memories of Dr. Hayao Kawai

Related Posts and Pages

Summary | Novelist as a Profession

Note | Novelist as a Profession

Note (EN) Horned Owl Spreads Its Wings Only With the Falling of the Dusk (Haruki Murakami A Long, Long Interview) with Mieko Kawakami

Book Review | Abandoning a Cat, When I Talk About My Father

Note | Abandoning a Cat, When I Talk About My Father

Timeline of Haruki Murakami

Note (EN) | Hear the Wind Sing

Note (EN)| Drive My Car from Men Without Women

Summary | Drive My Car from Men Without Women

Book Review | Killing Commendatore

Note (EN) | Killing Commendatore, Book 1

Note (EN) | Killing Commendatore, Book 2

Works of Haruki Murakami

Literature / littérature / Literatur Page

YouTube Haruki Murakami Commentary Playlist

YouTube Literature & Philosophy Channel

Note | Locke’s Empiricist Epistemology

Criticism of Notion of Innate Ideas

John Locke’s question about epistemology or metaphysics was what is our origin of knowledge of nature and moral. Also what things we can be certain they are knowledge.

Locke denied the rationalist notion of innate ideas. The reason of the notion of innate ideas is all men already have ideas by nature. But Locke thought children don’t know complex ideas like law of contradiction or law of excluded middle. Even ideas of justice or the God should be known or made by knowledge or thinking. All of ideas must be made by men through a path. Locke named the path experience .

Locke’s Epistemology

Sensations such as white, sweet and rough we feel by the five senses, Locke called impression . The stuff, temporary impression is fixed, Locke called idea .

Human mind at birth is a tabula rasa (blank slate). Sense and reflection as workings of mind describe ideas on tabula rasa. Sense produces ideas about external things such as white, black, hot or cool. Reflection produces ideas about function of mind such as thinking, perception or will.

Ideas given by sense and reflection, are named simple ideas . The mind makes a complex idea by some simple ideas.

Locke confirmed intuitive knowledge and demonstrative knowledge based on mutual comparison among ideas are certain, and established the basis of empirical science.

Substance and Primary Quality / Secondary Quality

Locke limited certain knowledge is made by ideas on the range of perception.

Although Locke insisted substances and the God are exist in the outside of mind. Primary quantities are objective qualities such as solid body, extension or motion. Secondary qualities are qualities of which primary qualities affect a mind and associated by/in mind.

Locke’s notion of substances and qualities may be a remain of Descartes’ dualism or his desire for the truth (correspondence between subject and object).

References

Jean-François Revel, Histoire de la philosophie occidentale (Nil Éditions, 1994)

Luc Ferry & Claude Capelier, La plus belle histoire de la philosophie (Éditions Points, 2014)

Roger-Pol Droit, Une brève histoire de la philosophie (Flammarion, 2008)

Bertrand Russell, The History of Western Philosophy (Simon & Schuster, 1972)

Nigel Warburton, A Little History of Philosophy (Yale University Press, 2011)

Roger Scruton, A Short History of Modern Philosophy (Routledge, 2002)

Gen Kida, History of Anti-Philosophy (Kodansha Academic Library, 2000)

Seiji Takeda & Ken Nishi, The First Histoty of Philosophy: To Think Profoundly (Yuhikaku, 1998)

Shigeto Nuki, Illustrated & Standard History of Philosophy (Shinshokan, 2008)

Shigeto Nuki, Philosophy Map (Chikuma New Books, 2004)

Sumihiko Kumano, The History of Western Philosophy: From The Modern Ages to The Present Day (Iwanami New Books, 2006)

Thierry Paquot & François Pépin, Dictionnaire Larousse de la Philosophie (Éditions Larousse, 2011)

Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (Second Edition Revised), (Oxford University Press, 2008)

Robert Audi, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (Second Edition), (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

Thomas Mautner, The Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy (Second Edition), (Penguin Books, 2005)

Related Posts and Pages

Note | Berkeley’s Subjective Idealism

Note | Hume’s Skeptical Empiricism

Note | Philosophy of René Descartes

Note | A Definition of Philosophy

Timeline of Philosophy

Philosophy / Philosophie