Tag: anglais

Overview

​​

“In the Manner of Borodin, M.63/1” is a short piano piece by Maurice Ravel, composed in 1912-1913. It is part of a diptych of humorous pieces or pastiches, the other being “In the Manner of Chabrier”.

is a general overview of this work:

Musical pastiche: As its title suggests, the piece is written ” in the manner of” Borodin, a Russian composer whose music Ravel admired, particularly for its orchestral colors and lyricism. Ravel is not copying an existing work by Borodin, but is imitating his characteristic style.

Style: The piece is often described as a waltz. It evokes the atmosphere and musical idiom of Borodin, with lyrical melodies and a sense of storytelling, although this is handled with Ravel ‘s own finesse and refined harmony .

A nod to Borodin: It contains elements reminiscent of the Russian composer, such as a certain Slavic melancholy, a warm lyricism and a poetic side . Ravel manages to capture the spirit of Borodin while retaining his own musical signature .

Context: These two pieces , “In the manner of Borodin” and “In the manner of Chabrier”, were written at the request of Ravel’s publisher, to be published in a collection of pastiches of French composers of the time, which explains their character of homage and stylistic imitation.

Short and concise: The piece is quite short, like most of the pieces in the collection. It is a miniature, a snapshot of Borodin’s style seen through the prism of Ravel.

In summary , ” In the Manner of Borodin” is a charming musical homage in which Ravel, with his talent as a brilliant forger, manages to embody the lyrical and poetic style of Alexander Borodin while putting his own stamp on it, in a short piece for piano .

History

The story of “In the Manner of Borodin” is closely linked to a friendship and a game of wit between Parisian musicians at the beginning of the 20th century . The idea for the piece did not come from Ravel himself , but from a friend and composer, Alfredo Casella. The latter had already written a series of six musical pastiches in 1911 and proposed to Ravel that he join forces to create a new series of “musical portraits” in the manner of other composers.

Ravel accepted this challenge, choosing two figures he deeply admired: Emmanuel Chabrier, for his French music full of vitality and clarity, and Alexander Borodin, one of the composers of the famous Russian ” Group of Five.” Borodin’s choice was all the more significant because Ravel and his friends, a circle of Parisian artists and intellectuals calling themselves “The Apaches,” had adopted a theme from Borodin’s Second Symphony as their secret rallying sign.

Thus, Ravel composed ” In the Manner of Borodin” in 1912-1913. The piece is a piano waltz, but it is a waltz that has nothing Parisian about it. On the contrary, it is imbued with the lyricism and chromaticism that he associated with Borodin. It contains a Slavic melancholy, a poetic breath and harmonies that evoke the style of the Russian composer, while remaining in the refined and elegant musical language of Ravel .

The piece , along with its companion piece “À la maniere de Chabrier,” was finally published in 1914. They received their public premiere on December 10, 1913 , at the Salle Pleyel, during a concert by the Société musicale ind épendante . This concert marked the birth of this diptych, which was not only a demonstration of pianistic virtuosity, but also an affectionate and humorous tribute to two masters whom Ravel cherished. The piece has since remained a perfect example of Ravel’s genius in appropriating a foreign style and sublimating it with his own signature.

Characteristics of Music

Maurice Ravel’s ” In the Manner of Borodin” is a piece that perfectly illustrates the art of pastiche, where the artist does not simply copy, but imbues himself with the spirit of his model to create an original and personal work. In this short piano waltz, Ravel appropriates Borodin’s musical characteristics with remarkable finesse and intelligence.

The composition is distinguished by several distinctive musical features that echo the style of the Russian composer:

A lyrical and melancholic atmosphere: The piece is imbued with an expressive and warm melody, typical of Borodin’s lyricism, often associated with the Russian soul . Ravel manages to capture this expressiveness with melodic lines that seem to breathe, carried by an “Allegro giusto” tempo that makes them both lively and elegant .

Orchestral Harmonies and Colors: Although the piece is written for solo piano, Ravel uses the keyboard to suggest the sounds of an orchestra. It features rich harmonies and expressive dissonances that are characteristic of Russian Romanticism. The composer frequently uses seventh and ninth chords that create a lush sonic atmosphere and depth of harmony, reminiscent of Borodin’s orchestral writing.

Pedal play and ostinatos: Ravel skillfully uses the sustain pedal to create “harmonic pedals” that give the impression that the melody is floating above a persistent sound base. This technique, combined with repeated rhythmic patterns ( ostinatos), is a nod to Borodin’s writing, particularly the drone effect that gives a sense of anchoring and sonic color.

A Well-Structured Waltz Form: Despite its impressionistic and pastiche character, the piece follows a clear, classical form, a waltz in D – flat major with a binary structure and a coda. This formal clarity is a trademark of Ravel, who, even in his most “impressionistic” works, always retained a keen sense of structure and musical logic, in contrast to the freer style of some of his contemporaries.

In short, “In the Manner of Borodin” is not a simple imitation, but an interpretation of Borodin’s style by a Ravel who has assimilated the elements of his model to merge them with his own writing. The result is a work which, in evoking Russian music, is undeniably and profoundly Ravelian, testifying to his technical mastery and his ability to create unique musical atmospheres .

Style(s), movement(s) and period of composition

Period and Movement

” In the Manner of Borodin” was composed by Maurice Ravel in 1912-1913, which places it at the heart of the period of modern music, more precisely in the last years of Symbolism and musical Impressionism. Ravel is often considered one of the leading figures of these movements, although he always sought to distance himself from labels.

A Dialogue between Tradition and Innovation
The piece is a perfect example of Ravel’s style, which is both innovative and deeply rooted in tradition.

Innovative: The work is innovative in its approach to harmony. Ravel uses complex chords (ninths , elevenths ) , expressive dissonances and superpositions of tones that are characteristic of his style at the time. He moves away from the strict rules of classicism to explore new sounds, much like his Impressionist contemporaries.

Traditional: However, Ravel never abandoned his attachment to classical forms and a certain structural clarity. The piece is a waltz, a traditional form. Moreover, it is a pastiche, that is , a work that imitates the style of another composer. In this case, it is Alexander Borodin, a composer of the Russian Romantic and nationalist period.

A Crossroads of Styles

The piece is a fascinating mix of several influences and styles:

Impressionist and Symbolist: The treatment of the piano, with the use of the pedal and ostinatos to create sound atmospheres and colors, is typically impressionist. The overall mood is more evocative than narrative.

Romantic and Nationalist: Ravel pays homage to Borodin by incorporating elements of his style: lyrical and expressive melodies, a certain Slavic melancholy and a narrative side . It is Borodin’s romantic and nationalist style that is imitated, showing Ravel’s admiration for Russian music.

Neoclassicism : Although it is more clearly identifiable in his later works such as Le Tombeau de Couperin, neoclassicism is already present here through the attachment to a clear, classical form (the waltz) which contrasts with the richness and boldness of the harmony.

In conclusion, “In the Manner of Borodin” is a work that demonstrates the complexity of Ravel’s style. It is both a modern piece , innovative in its harmonic language and sonority, and a traditional homage to a Romantic composer, all within a classical formal framework.

Analysis: Form, Technique(s), Texture, Harmony, Rhythm

Musical Analysis of “In the Manner of Borodin”
Maurice Ravel’s ” In the Manner of Borodin” is a piece that, beneath its simple waltz-like appearance, reveals great technical and structural sophistication. It is a perfect example of Ravel’s ability to imitate a musical style while adding his own signature.

The Method and Techniques
method for this pastiche is that of stylistic imitation. He does not literally copy a Borodin melody, but appropriates the characteristics of his style to transpose them into his own musical language. The main technique is the pianistic transcription of an orchestral thought. Ravel uses the sonorities and dynamics of the piano to evoke the richness and color of a symphony orchestra, in the manner of Borodin, whose music was particularly famous for its instrumentation.

Texture and Shape
The texture of the music is predominantly homophonic, with a clear, expressive melody in the right hand, accompanied by harmonic accompaniment in the left hand. However, moments of subtle polyphony can be heard, particularly when the main melody is doubled or enriched by other melodic lines that move independently .

The form is that of an ABA waltz, with a coda. It is a simple and clear structure, but Ravel adds variations and developments.

Part A: The main waltz is presented , with its lyrical and melancholic melody.

Part B: A more contrasting passage, often more lyrical and with a change of mode (moving from major to minor) or tonality .

Part A’: The return of the main waltz, often with subtle variations in accompaniment or harmony.

Coda: The piece ends with a concluding section which uses waltz motifs.

Harmony, Scale and Rhythm
Key : The main key is D flat major (

D♭
major), a key often associated with lyricism and a certain softness. The piece uses modulations and harmonic borrowings that enrich the sound palette.

Harmony: The harmony is both romantic and modern. Ravel uses seventh and ninth chords that create complex and expressive sound colors. There are also unresolved dissonances and chromaticism that reinforce the melancholic atmosphere of the piece .

Scale: The scale used is the diatonic (major) D-flat scale , but Ravel inserts chromatic notes and motifs that evoke exotic or oriental scales, which is another characteristic of Borodin’s music.

Rhythm: The rhythm is that of a waltz, with a well-marked three-quarter time signature . The tempo is “Allegro giusto,” meaning “fast, but in tune ,” which gives the music a lively yet elegant character . The use of ostinatos in the accompaniment (a repetition of rhythmic patterns) is a technique borrowed from Borodin that adds a hypnotic and lingering character to the piece .

Tutorial, performance tips and important playing points

Introduction

Playing Ravel’s “In the Manner of Borodin” is like engaging in a conversation with two masters . On one side , there is the lyrical passion of Alexander Borodin, and on the other, the refinement and elegance of Ravel. To succeed in this piece , you must find the balance between Russian melancholy and French clarity . Here is a tutorial, performance tips, and key points to guide you.

1. The Lyrical and Flexible Waltz

The piece is a waltz, but it is far from a simple dance piece. Focus on a tempo of “Allegro giusto,” which means “fairly fast, but with a sense of justice and accuracy.” Don’t rush; the lyricism of the melody needs to breathe.

Rubato: Ravel doesn’t specify rubato, but to capture Borodin’s romantic spirit, you can slightly speed up and slow down in certain places. The idea is to make the melody sing, not play it mechanically.

Right hand: The melody should be cantabile, that is , “singing.” Use a deep, supple touch so that each note has weight. Think of the melody like a cello or horn voice in an orchestra, with a full, warm sound.

2. The Rhythm of Accompaniment

The left hand, in addition to providing harmony, maintains the waltz rhythm. Balance is crucial.

The first beat: The first beat of the measure to

3/4

is heavy and accentuated. Give it a boost, but avoid making it too heavy. It should start the movement of the measure.

The second and third beats : The next two beats are lighter and gently accompany the first beat. Think of a pizzicato string or a light cymbal crash. The goal is to create a fluid, danceable rhythm.

The ostinato: Ravel uses a rhythmic ostinato in the first theme . Make sure this ostinato remains steady and stable. It is the foundation upon which the melody unfolds .

3. Harmonies and the Pedal

The piece is rich in harmonies that create a special atmosphere . The pedal is essential to reveal its full splendor.

The “Ravelian sound”: This is the result of judicious use of the pedal . Change pedals with each chord change to avoid muddiness, but keep the fingering legato. Sometimes, one note of the melody is held longer than the others, creating a subtle resonance that adds richness to the harmony.

Dissonances: Ravel uses ninth chords and dissonances to add tension and color. Don’t be afraid of these dissonances. Let them express themselves and resonate; they are an integral part of the beauty of the music.

4. Important Points to Work on

Clarity : Even when using the pedal, always maintain a sense of clarity. Each voice should be audible. Work on the melody and accompaniment separately before combining them.

Character : Beyond technique, interpretation is key. Think about what Ravel is trying to say. It’s a conversation between two eras, two styles. The transition from the lyrical theme to the more intimate and melancholic part must happen naturally.

Dynamics: Ravel’s dynamic indications are precise and must be respected . From “p” to “ff,” each dynamic has a meaning. Don’t overload the interpretation. Subtle nuances are as important as grand flights of fancy.

In short , to succeed with this piece , you must find the right balance between romantic expression and formal clarity . Feel free to listen to recordings of great pianists for inspiration, but don’t forget to find your own voice in this beautiful waltz.

Famous Recordings

Despite being a short piece and often considered a miniature, “In the Manner of Borodin” has been recorded by many great pianists, often as part of complete piano works by Ravel.

famous recordings , classified by type of performance :

Historical and great tradition recordings

These recordings bear witness to a time when performance was often freer and more expressive, with particular attention to poetry and color .

Vlado Perlemuter: He is an essential reference for the complete Ravel works. Perlemuter worked with the composer himself , and his interpretations are therefore of a rare authenticity. His ” In the Manner of Borodin” is both lyrical and crystal clear, with an intimate understanding of Ravel’s nuances.

Robert Casadesus: Another figure of the great French tradition . Casadesus brings an elegance and refinement that are characteristic of the French school , with a perfect mastery of rhythm and a clear and elegant sound .

Samson François : Samson François ‘ interpretation is more romantic and personal. He favors poetry and freedom of phrasing, which gives his version a more pronounced melancholy, entirely in the spirit of Borodin’s pastiche.

Standard and contemporary recordings

These recordings are often the result of a more in-depth search for the composer’s intentions, with great fidelity to the score and impressive technical virtuosity.

Jean-Yves Thibaudet: Thibaudet’s complete Ravel works are highly acclaimed . His playing is both virtuoso and poetic, and his version of “In the Manner of Borodin” is extremely fluid. He highlights the colors and harmonies of the piece with remarkable transparency.

Martha Argerich: Although she did not record Ravel’s complete works , her recordings of his works are legendary. Her fiery and passionate style , combined with impeccable technique, gives a particular intensity to the piece .

Angela Hewitt: Known for her clarity and musical intelligence, Angela Hewitt’s interpretation is a modern reference . She highlights the structure of the piece while respecting its poetic character .

Steven Osborne: His recording is renowned for its impeccable sound and analytically thought-out interpretation , while retaining emotion and poetry. It is often cited as a benchmark for Ravel’s complete piano works.

Seong-Jin Cho: More recently, this recording has been praised for its technical mastery and the maturity of its interpretation, highlighting the orchestral aspect of the piece .

These recordings offer a wide range of interpretations, from the elegant romanticism of the ancient tradition to the analytical clarity of modern interpretations, illustrating the richness of this small work and Ravel’s genius.

Episodes and anecdotes

The story of “In the Manner of Borodin” is dotted with little anecdotes that shed light not only on the piece itself , but also on the mind of its composer, Maurice Ravel, and his entourage.

The Apache War Cry

One of the most famous anecdotes concerns the group of Parisian artists and intellectuals that Ravel frequented at the beginning of the 20th century , who nicknamed themselves “The Apaches.” This name, given to them by a journalist, referred to their character as marginal and rebellious individuals. What is less well known is their secret “war cry”: a musical theme taken from the beginning of Alexander Borodin’s Second Symphony. This theme , played and sung in gratitude, became a symbol of their friendship and admiration for the Russian composer. It was therefore quite natural that Ravel, in accepting the challenge of composing a pastiche, chose Borodin as the subject, in homage to this musical complicity that united them.

The Italian Friend and the Musical Challenge

The very idea for the piece did not come from Ravel, but from one of his friends, the Italian composer Alfredo Casella. Casella had already published his own series of musical pastiches and invited several composers, including Ravel, to join it. Ravel, with his sense of humor and his passion for pastiche (which he had already practiced on other occasions), accepted the challenge with enthusiasm. This gave rise to this diptych, “In the manner of Borodin” and “In the manner of Chabrier,” two pieces that demonstrate his ability to imitate the style of very different composers , one Russian and lyrical, the other French and clear.

Pastiche and authenticity

The most subtle, and most revealing, anecdote of Ravel’s genius is found in the music itself . Ravel, a good “genius forger” as he has often been called, does not simply copy Borodin. He appropriates the style and adds his own touch. The piece is a waltz, a form not particularly associated with Borodin. Ravel uses this popular form to infuse it with the Slavic soul, melancholy, and lyricism characteristic of the Russian composer. It is a work that, on the surface, is by Borodin, but in its harmonic details and fine phrasing, is unmistakably Ravel ‘s . This duality is a musical inside joke for those familiar with the music of both composers.

Creation in peacetime… before the war

The piece was first performed in public in December 1913 at a concert of the Independent Musical Society . It was an event celebrating musicians ‘ friendship, humor, and creativity . No one could have suspected that a year later, the First World War would break out, and that the serenity and frivolity of these artistic exchanges would be swept away by the conflict. “In the Manner of Borodin” therefore remains a testament to an era of peace and carefree artistic creativity that preceded the great upheaval of the 20th century.

Similar compositions

Pastiches and tributes

In the manner of Chabrier, M.63/2 by Maurice Ravel: This is the diptych of the piece . Ravel imitates the energetic, clear and rhythmic style of Emmanuel Chabrier, another composer he admired. The contrast between the two pieces is perfect.

Tributes to a Master by Alfredo Casella: Ravel’s friend who inspired the creation of the diptych. Casella wrote several tributes to composers such as Fauré and Debussy, and his pieces share the same intellectual approach to pastiche.

Forgotten Images of Claude Debussy: Debussy, a contemporary and rival of Ravel, also wrote pieces that borrow from other styles or evoke foreign moods . “Homage to Rameau,” in Images, Book I, is an example of his approach to the past .

Russian influence

Scheherazade, Op. 35 by Nikolai Rimsky -Korsakov: Ravel admired Russian music and, like his friend Borodin, Rimsky-Korsakov was a master of orchestration and oriental lyricism. The orchestral colors and narrative atmosphere of this work have inspired many French composers .

The Poem of Ecstasy, Op. 54 by Alexander Scriabin: Ravel also appreciated Scriabin’s music. Although very different , this work shares with Ravel a great harmonic sophistication and an exploration of sound colors.

Igor Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring: Although the styles are different, Stravinsky’s work had a huge impact on Ravel and his contemporaries. The bold use of rhythm and the evocation of a mythical past resonate with Ravel’s interest in national music.

Piano pieces and miniatures

Preludes , Book I and Book II by Claude Debussy: Debussy’s preludes are piano miniatures that, like “In the Manner of Borodin,” explore a particular musical idea or atmosphere . They include evocative titles like “The Girl with Flaxen Hair” or “The Hills of Anacapri,” which are similar to the idea of a musical sketch.

Album leaves by Claude Debussy: These little piano pieces are also perfect examples of charming miniatures, which share with Ravel a great finesse of writing .

Fantasy Pieces, Op. 3 by Sergei Rachmaninov: These piano pieces share with “In the Manner of Borodin” a melancholy and lyricism that are characteristic of Russian music.

(This article was generated by Gemini. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Overview

​​

Le Tombeau de Couperin is a suite of six pieces for solo piano, composed by Maurice Ravel between 1914 and 1917, and published under the reference M. 68. The title, “Tombeau de Couperin”, refers to an 18th-century tradition of paying homage to an artist with a musical work. It is therefore less a tribute to the composer François Couperin than to 18th -century French music as a whole .

The work is one of Ravel’s most important, but it is also deeply marked by the context of its creation: the First World War. Each movement is dedicated to the memory of a friend of the composer who fell at the front, which gives a dimension that is both nostalgic and poignant to this music. Ravel also had to face immense personal despair during this period, particularly after the death of his mother .

The suite consists of six movements:

1 Prelude​

2 Fugue

3 Forlane

4 Rigaudon

5 Minuet

6 Toccata

Ravel then orchestrated four of these six pieces ( the Prelude, the Forlane, the Menuet and the Rigaudon) in 1919, creating an orchestral version, referenced M. 68a , which is also very popular . The first performance of the piano version took place on April 11, 1919, by the pianist Marguerite Long, to whom the Toccata is dedicated in homage to her husband, Joseph de Marliave, who also died in the war.

List of titles

1 Prelude – Dedicated to Lieutenant Jacques Charlot, who transcribed several of Ravel’s works .

2 Fugue – Dedicated to Jean Cruppi, son of the singer Louise Cruppi, who helped create the Spanish version of Ravel’s opera, L’Heure espagnole .

3 Forlane – Dedicated to Lieutenant Gabriel Deluc, a painter and friend of Ravel.

4 Rigaudon – Dedicated to the memory of Pierre and Pascal Gaudin, brothers and friends of Ravel, both killed in combat.

5 Menuet – Dedicated to the memory of Jean Dreyfus, friend of Ravel and son of the composer Edgar Dreyfus.

6 Toccata – Dedicated to the memory of Joseph de Marliave, the husband of pianist Marguerite Long, who created the suite.

History

Composed between 1914 and 1917, Le Tombeau de Couperin by Maurice Ravel is a work deeply influenced by the context of its creation: the First World War. The title of the work refers to an 18th – century tradition , the “tombeau,” which consisted of paying homage to a deceased artist. Ravel does not pay homage to François Couperin in particular, but to all French music of this period, which he appreciated for its clarity, elegance , and delicacy .

However, beyond this stylistic tribute, the work is a true personal memorial. The war was a time of immense hardship for Ravel. He attempted to enlist but was rejected due to his health, which prompted him to become an ambulance driver at the front. He also lost close friends and his mother , a central figure in his life. It was in this climate of mourning that Ravel wrote this suite of six piano pieces. Each of the pieces is dedicated to a friend of the composer who lost their life in combat, thus transforming the work into a poignant war memorial.

Despite this tragic dimension, Le Tombeau de Couperin is not a dark work. Ravel refused to sink into pathos, choosing instead to compose music that celebrates life , memory, and the elegance of the French style . The suite alternates classical forms such as the fugue and toccata with ancient dances (forlane, rigaudon, minuet), each capturing a different atmosphere , from vivacity to understated melancholy.

The first performance of the piano suite took place on April 11, 1919, by Marguerite Long, to whom Ravel had dedicated the Toccata in memory of her husband. Ravel subsequently orchestrated four of the six movements (Prélude, Forlane, Menuet, and Rigaudon) to create an equally celebrated orchestral version , which contributed to the work ‘s enduring popularity . Le Tombeau de Couperin is a powerful testament to Ravel’s ability to combine musical sophistication with sincere emotional depth , even in the most difficult circumstances.

Characteristics of Music

Le Tombeau de Couperin, M. 68 by Maurice Ravel, is distinguished by several musical characteristics which make it a unique work , combining homage to the past and modernity .

Tribute to the French Baroque style

The composition is above all a stylistic homage to 18th-century French Baroque music , and in particular to François Couperin. Ravel uses ancient dance forms (Forlane, Rigaudon, Minuet) and character pieces ( Prelude, Fugue, Toccata) typical of this period. He draws inspiration from the polyphonic clarity and ornamental elegance that characterize this music, while adding his own touch.

Clarity and precision​

Ravel’s music in this work is remarkably precise and transparent. The melodic lines are always distinct and the musical texture is airy , far from post-romantic density. We find Ravel’s keen sense of detail, where each note and each ornament has its place and role .

Harmony and tonality

Although the basic key is E minor for most of the pieces , Ravel uses modern harmonies and bold modulations. He enriches the traditional tonal language with non-diatonic chords, appoggiaturas, and delays, creating a sound that is both familiar and new.

Virtuosity and piano technique

The work demands great virtuosity from the performer . The Prelude and Toccata, in particular, are demonstrations of pianistic technique. The Prelude demands agile fingers for its rapid notes and continuous flow of sixteenth notes. The Toccata, with its repeated notes and octave passages , is a bravura piece . The Fugue is also complex, demonstrating Ravel’s mastery of polyphony .

Emotional contrasts

Despite the context of mourning and the dedication to deceased friends, the music is not somber. Ravel chose to express a subtle and restrained melancholy rather than ostentatious despair. There is a poignant contrast between the dignity and elegance of the music and the sadness of the dedications. The work alternates between joyful and playful movements (Rigaudon, Forlane) and more introspective moments (Minuet), creating a rich and nuanced emotional palette .

Style(s), movement(s) and period of composition

Maurice Ravel’s Le Tombeau de Couperin is a work that stands at a stylistic crossroads, illustrating both the legacy of the past and modernity. It cannot be categorized into a single category, but it is an emblematic example of Neoclassicism, with influences from Impressionism and a post-Romantic tone.

Neo – classicism

At the heart of the work’s style is neoclassicism, a movement that emerged after the First World War as a reaction to the emotional excesses and grandiloquence of Romanticism. Ravel consciously drew on 18th-century musical forms , particularly those of the Baroque harpsichord dance suites of composers such as François Couperin and Jean-Philippe Rameau. The suite is a modern reinterpretation of these forms, with movements such as the Rigaudon, the Forlane, and the Menuet being period dances. This return to formal clarity , polyphonic precision , and traditional structures is the defining characteristic of neoclassicism .

Style and movement

Neoclassicism : The Neoclassical movement was a reaction to the emotional excess and breadth of late Romanticism and post-Romanticism. Ravel paid stylistic homage to 18th- century Baroque music by using ancient dance forms (Forlane, Rigaudon, Minuet) and character pieces ( Prelude, Fugue, Toccata), typical of the harpsichord suites of composers such as François Couperin . The work seeks clarity , formal simplicity , and precision of musical textures, characteristic of this period .

Impressionism: Although Le Tombeau de Couperin marks a turn towards neoclassicism for Ravel, it retains touches of his earlier Impressionist style . There are enriched harmonies, ninth chords , and orchestral colors (in the orchestral version) that create a subtle and evocative atmosphere , even if the emotional expression is more restrained than in works like Gaspard de la Nuit.

Tonality and harmony

Although the structure is ancient, the musical language is resolutely modern. Ravel uses sophisticated harmonies, bold modulations, and subtle dissonances that were unthinkable in the Baroque era. The music is neither purely tonal in the classical manner nor purely atonal. It lies in an in-between, where tonality is present but often enriched with colors reminiscent of Impressionism . There are passages with whole scales , ninth chords , and colors that create an ethereal atmosphere . 🎨

A work that is both traditional and innovative

The Tomb of Couperin is therefore a fascinating synthesis :

Traditional in its forms (series of dances) and its character of homage.

Innovative in its harmony, its orchestration (in the orchestral version) and its piano technique.

The work represents Ravel’s attempt to strike a balance between the dignity of the past and the reality of the present. It moves away from the emotional extravagance of post-Romanticism while retaining an expressive depth and understated melancholy , especially given its dedication to departed friends. The style can therefore be described as neoclassical , tinged with impressionism and a modern sensibility reflected in the clarity and restraint of expression.

Analysis: Form, Technique(s), Texture, Harmony, Rhythm

Le Tombeau de Couperin is a work rich in musical complexities that combine tradition with modernity .

Method and technique

Ravel uses writing techniques that are both inherited from the past and typical of his time. He makes obvious use of polyphony in the Fugue, where the voices respond to and intertwine with great clarity. However, the suite is not entirely polyphonic . Ravel also uses more homophonic textures, with a main melody accompanied by chords or arpeggios , as in the Minuet. In other pieces, such as the Toccata, the technique focuses on virtuosity and velocity , with work on repeated notes and cross-hand passages .

Form and structure

The general form is that of a Baroque dance suite, composed of six distinct movements, each with its own structure.

Prelude : Ternary form (ABA’), with a contrasting middle section .

Fugue: Traditional fugue structure, with an exposition, episodes, and strettos.

Forlane: Character dance in ternary form (ABA).

Rigaudon: Lively dance in ternary form (ABA), with a softer central section.

Minuet: Ternary form of minuet with a central trio.

Toccata: Bravura piece in sonata form without development, with sections that highlight the piano’s resources.

Musical texture

The texture is mainly polyphonic or homophonic depending on the movements. The Fugue is an example of polyphony where several independent melodic lines intertwine . The Minuet is mainly homophonic, with a clear melody supported by chords. In the Toccata, the texture is more complex, combining homophonic elements (repeated notes in the right hand) and polyphonic elements (independent bass line).

Harmony, scale, tonality and rhythm
ninth chords , gentle dissonances, and chromatic modulations, creating a sound that is both classical and modern. The harmony is neither purely diatonic nor atonal; it lies somewhere in between.

Scale: Ravel uses mainly diatonic scales, but with ancient modes and chromatic influences to color the melody .

Tonality : The main tonality of the suite is E minor (E-moll). Each movement is structured around this tonality, but Ravel explores different tonalities and modes to create contrasts. For example, the Fugue is in E minor, but the Forlane is in E major, creating a sense of light .

Rhythm: The rhythm is very varied , as required for a dance sequence. It is precise and regular in dance movements such as the Rigaudon (2/4 rhythm) and the Minuet (3/4 rhythm). The Toccata is characterized by a sustained and rapid rhythmic energy. The Forlane uses a particular rhythm in 6/8, giving an impression of lightness and elegance .

Tutorial, performance tips and important playing points

Performing Maurice Ravel’s Le Tombeau de Couperin on the piano is a major technical and musical challenge. Here is a tutorial, performance tips, and key points for successfully approaching this work .

General tips for interpretation

Clarity and precision: This is the key word in this work. Ravel, as a pianist, demanded crystal-clear clarity in performance . Avoid the vagueness of the sustain pedal and ensure that each note is well articulated , even in the fastest passages.

Mastery of Style: The work is neoclassical. The performer must strike a balance between the dignity and restraint of the Baroque style and the harmonic richness of the 20th century . Avoid overly romantic emotions and concentrate on line, rhythm, and color.

The architecture of the work: Each piece has its own form and character . Understanding the structure of each movement (ternary, fugue, sonata, etc.) is essential to giving meaning to your interpretation.

Tutorial and key points for each movement

1. Prelude​

Technique: This movement is an exercise in finger agility, with a continuous flow of sixteenth notes. The wrist must be flexible and the hand relaxed to avoid tension.

Interpretation : The character is light and airy. The expression should be discreet . Think of an infinite line, with subtle variations in dynamics rather than great contrasts. Avoid playing too loudly; the force should come from speed, not pressure.

2. Fugue

Technique: The fugue is the most polyphonic piece. Each voice must be clearly audible and have its own character . It is crucial to work on each voice separately .

Interpretation : The character is serious but not austere . The theme should be well stated and the entry of each new voice should be highlighted. The ending should fade out gently.

3. Forlane

Technique: This movement is a rhythmic challenge. You have to feel the rhythm of the dance, an elegant 6/8 , and maintain a regular pulse . The playing must be connected and fluid.

Interpretation : The Forlane has a melancholic character but with a certain grace . The subtle use of the pedal can help create a veiling effect, but the clarity of the phrases must be preserved . The contrast between the sections is important .

4. Rigaudon

Technique: This is a lively and robust dance. The rhythm is in 2/4 time. The playing must be clear and percussive, especially in the bass notes. The quieter central trio requires a radical change of touch.

Interpretation : The character is playful and joyful. Rhythmic precision is essential to give the impression of a dance. The trio should contrast strongly, with a softer touch and a more introspective expression.

5. Minuet

Technique: This movement is an example of subtle homophony. The melody should sing, with a discreet bass line and accompaniments that do not mask it.

Interpretation : This is the most lyrical and poignant piece in the suite. The interpretation should be expressive , but not excessive . The character is solemn and delicate. Care must be taken with the voice-leading, particularly in the central trio section.

6. Toccata

The Toccata is one of the most virtuoso pieces in the repertoire. It requires considerable stamina and impeccable technique. Practice the repeated notes and the cross -hand passages slowly, concentrating on the regularity and precision of the rhythm.

Interpretation : The character is fierce and motoric. The energy must be constant from beginning to end . The dynamics must be respected to create a feeling of continuous crescendo and tension. The ending is a real challenge of endurance.

Pedal​​

Beware the pedal ! This is a crucial point. Ravel himself indicated that the pedal should be used extremely sparingly to preserve clarity . Often, the pedal is used to give harmonic color rather than to link notes. It should be used as an effect, not as a reflex .

In summary , the performance of Couperin’s Tomb requires a combination of technical precision, stylistic understanding, and musical sensitivity that goes beyond surface emotions. It is a work that celebrates dignity and clarity even in grief.

Successful piece or collection at the time ?

When Le Tombeau de Couperin was first performed in 1919, it was an immediate public and critical success. The pianist Marguerite Long, to whom Ravel had dedicated the Toccata, gave the first performance on April 11, 1919, at the Salle Gaveau in Paris . The success was such that she was forced to play the entire work a second time in response to the audience’s enthusiasm, which is an undeniable sign of its warm reception.

This success can be explained by several factors:

The appeal of Neoclassicism: Audiences and critics of the time, tired of the emotional excess of late Romanticism, were seduced by Ravel ‘s return to the clarity , form , and elegance of the 18th – century French style . The work offered sophisticated and controlled music , while retaining expressive depth.

Emotional Resonance: Although the music is stylized and not overtly sentimental, the context of its composition—a poignant tribute to Ravel’s friends who fell during the First World War—struck a chord with listeners. Each dedication gave the work a powerful and moving memorial dimension.

Virtuosity and Beauty: The pieces are remarkably well written for the piano, combining moments of delicacy and grace ( Forlane, Menuet) with spectacular virtuosity (Toccata). The music is both demanding for the performer and very rewarding to listen to.

Sales of sheet music

It is difficult to find precise sales figures for the scores of the period. However, given the success of the premiere and the rapid popularity of the work, it can be assumed that the piano scores sold well. The success of the piano version also prompted Ravel to orchestrate four of the six movements in 1919, creating an orchestral suite that was also very successful and is now a standard concert piece in the repertoire .

The publication of the scores by the Durand publishing house allowed the work to be widely disseminated and studied , guaranteeing its lasting place in the piano and orchestral repertoire.

Famous Recordings

Several recordings of the piano version of Couperin’s Tomb are considered benchmarks , each offering a unique approach to this complex work. Here is a list of the most famous and critically acclaimed performances:

1. Historical records
These recordings are precious for their authenticity, often made by performers who knew the composer or who are of his generation .

Vlado Perlemuter: His recordings from the 1950s and 1970s are considered essential documents. A former student of Ravel, he received interpretive advice directly from the master . His playing is characterized by absolute clarity, impeccable rhythmic precision, and a total absence of sentimentality, faithful to Ravel ‘s aesthetic .

the 1950s are famous for their unique sound and impressionistic atmosphere . Gieseking favors color and delicacy , creating an ethereal and poetic interpretation .

Samson François : Known for his individualism and flamboyant virtuosity, his recording is distinguished by a freedom and passion that departs from the rigor of Perlemuter, offering a more romantic and personal vision of the work .

2. Recordings of the great tradition

These performances, often made in the following decades, helped establish the work’s reputation and are considered classics of the recorded repertoire .

Pascal Rog é : His complete Ravel works are widely acclaimed . Rog é offers a playing of great elegance , a luminous sound and an intimate understanding of the structure of the work, making it a standard reference .

Jean-Yves Thibaudet: His recording is praised for its impeccable technique and sense of color. Thibaudet excels in rendering both the contrapuntal clarity of the Fugue and the flamboyant side of the Toccata.

Vladimir Ashkenazy: His performance is marked by great technical mastery and remarkable energy. It highlights the contrasts and rhythmic power of the work .

Louis Lortie: His interpretation is renowned for its elegance , finesse and sensitivity. Lortie combines great technical rigor with internalized poetry , offering a balanced and moving vision of the work .

3. Modern and contemporary interpretations

These more recent recordings bring new perspectives on the work, taking advantage of technical advances and the evolution of performance practice .

Steven Osborne: Known for his analytical approach and virtuosity, Osborne offers a performance of great clarity and impressive rhythmic force.

Seong-Jin Cho: His recording has become very popular , combining almost clinical precision with deep expressiveness, which has appealed to a wide audience.

Angela Hewitt: A pianist renowned for her interpretations of Bach, she brings to Ravel the same polyphonic clarity and dignity , underlining the link between Ravel’s work and 18th-century music .

Episodes and anecdotes

Le Tombeau de Couperin is a work that hides behind its elegance a personal and poignant story of Maurice Ravel, marked by the trials of the First World War. Here are some episodes and anecdotes that shed light on the genesis of this composition.

Mourning and Creation

Ravel began composing Le Tombeau de Couperin in 1914, but the war abruptly interrupted his work. Rejected from the army due to his physical frailty, he enlisted as a volunteer ambulance driver on the Eastern Front. He faced the horrors of the conflict and lost many friends and fellow musicians , several of whom became the dedicatees of the pieces . The war was a time of immense despair for Ravel. After the death of his mother in 1917, a central figure in his life, he fell into a deep depression, and composing the suite was a way for him to cope with his grief. The work, although stylized and dignified, is therefore an intimate and personal memorial to the fallen.

The Toccata Anecdote

The Toccata, the last piece in the suite, is dedicated to Joseph de Marliave, the husband of the pianist Marguerite Long. He too died at the front. Marguerite Long gave the first performance of the complete piano suite in 1919. One day, while rehearsing the Toccata, she complained to Ravel about the frenetic and almost inhumanly fast nature of the piece . Ravel simply replied with his dry humor: “Don’t cry, that’s why I wrote it . ” This sentence perfectly illustrates Ravel’s character, both implacable and full of black humor, who rejected easy emotion and sentimentality. He wanted the music to be a worthy monument and not a lament.

immediate and unexpected success

The world premiere of Le Tombeau de Couperin took place on April 11, 1919. The performance was a resounding success with the Parisian public. The enthusiasm was such that the audience asked Marguerite Long to perform the entire work again. This spontaneous response is a rare testament to the work’s power. The audience, marked by the mourning of war, was moved by this music, which, while intellectually constructed, offered comfort and soothing beauty.

The genesis of the orchestral version

Following the success of the piano version, Ravel decided to orchestrate it, but he chose to keep only four of the six movements: the Prelude, the Forlane, the Minuet, and the Rigaudon. He excluded the Fugue and the Toccata because he considered them too pianistic to be faithfully transcribed for orchestra, and he did not want to distort their character . This decision shows Ravel’s great respect for instrumentation and his concern for accuracy of expression. The orchestral version has become just as famous as the piano original , if not more so, and remains a highly regarded concert work .

Similar compositions

Here is a list of compositions, suites or collections that share similarities with Maurice Ravel’s Le Tombeau de Couperin, either by their style, their form, their period, or their character as homage.

French piano suites and pieces from the same period

Claude Debussy – Suite bergamasque (1890-1905): Although more impressionistic, this suite shares the form of the dance suite, with pieces such as the Prelude, the Menuet and the Passepied. Clair de lune is the most famous piece in the suite.

Claude Debussy – For the piano (1894-1901): This suite contains a Prelude, a Sarabande and a Toccata, which show formal similarities with Ravel’s pieces .

2. Neoclassicism and the return to ancient forms

Igor Stravinsky – Pulcinella (1920): Neoclassical ballet based on themes from 18th century composers such as Giovanni Battista Pergolesi. Stravinsky reinterprets ancient themes with his own harmonic and rhythmic language, just as Ravel reinterprets the baroque style .

Igor Stravinsky – Concerto for Piano and Wind Instruments ( 1923-1924): This work also reflects Stravinsky ‘s fascination with classical forms.

Arnold Schönberg – Piano Suite, Op. 25 (1921-1923): Although this suite is atonal and uses twelve-tone technique, it is structured in a neoclassical manner , with a Prelude, a Gavotte, a Musette, a Minuet, and a Gigue. It is an example of how modernist composers reinvested ancient forms.

3. Other tributes and dance suites

Gabriel Faur é – Masques et bergamasques, Op. 112 (1919): A suite for orchestra that, like Ravel’s work, pays homage to the elegance of 18th-century music and dance . Faur é was a mentor to Ravel, and their style shares a great clarity and grace .

Vincent d’Indy – Suite in the Old Style (1886): An earlier example of a suite for piano and violin that imitates the Baroque style.

Reynaldo Hahn – The Ball of Beatrice d’Este (1909): A suite of dances inspired by the Italian Renaissance, it shares the idea of drawing inspiration from past forms and eras to create a contemporary work.

(This article was generated by Gemini. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify