Overview
Arthur Honegger (1892-1955) was a French-Swiss composer and a member of the Group of Six, along with Darius Milhaud and Francis Poulenc. Unlike some of his colleagues, who favoured a light and ironic style, Honegger often adopted a more serious, dramatic and expressive approach. His music combines lyricism, orchestral power and a high degree of contrapuntal mastery, influenced as much by Bach as by 20th-century modernity.
Born in Le Havre to a Swiss family, Honegger studied at the Paris Conservatoire and quickly distinguished himself through his vigorous orchestral writing. He developed a personal style, marked by multiple influences: post-Romanticism, Neoclassicism, jazz and a fascination with the mechanical and industrial world. He is also known for his oratorio Jeanne d’Arc au bûcher (Joan of Arc at the Stake) (1935), a dramatic work combining spoken narrative and song, which illustrates his skill in combining expressiveness and rigorous musical construction.
Unlike Milhaud, who was often exuberant and daring in his harmonies, Honegger sought a balance between emotion and structure, combining an occasionally austere style with moments of great lyrical intensity. His symphonies, particularly the Second (1941) and the Third (‘Liturgique’, 1946), bear witness to this duality of strength and humanity.
Honegger is therefore a major figure in 20th-century music, a composer attached to tradition while exploring new languages, often with a dramatic intensity that sets him apart from his contemporaries in the Group of Six.
History
Arthur Honegger was a unique composer, a man who always seemed to oscillate between two worlds. Born in 1892 in Le Havre, France, to a Swiss family, he had within him this dual identity that would mark all his work: a rigorous spirit, almost Germanic in his taste for construction and form, and a profoundly French sensibility, tinged with lyricism and modernity.
Music became an obvious choice for him from a very early age. He went to study at the Paris Conservatoire, where he crossed paths with Darius Milhaud and Francis Poulenc. Together, they would later form the famous ‘Groupe des Six’, a circle of composers united by their rejection of Romanticism and Wagnerian and Debussy-style Impressionism. But Honegger never really subscribed to the group’s aesthetic manifesto. He loved Bach and Beethoven, and admired the orchestral power of Wagner and Mahler. His musical language was both classical and modern, with a penchant for raw, almost industrial energy.
He composed his first big hit in 1923: Pacific 231, a symphonic poem inspired by the locomotive of the same name. In this work, Honegger translates the strength and mechanical movement of the train into music, transforming the machine into a living, pulsating entity. This taste for dynamics and power is also found in his choral music and symphonies, where one senses a constant dramatic tension, an almost cinematographic breath.
But Honegger was not just a composer of power. He also knew how to express a rare emotional depth, as in his Rugby (another dynamic musical fresco), or his Oratorio Jeanne d’Arc au bûcher (1938), a moving work in which one perceives his attachment to the great figures of French history.
When the Second World War broke out, Honegger remained in Paris, unlike other members of the Group of Six who left France. He composed despite the Occupation, in a dark and distressing Paris. His Symphony No. 2 is a reflection of this: written for strings and solo trumpet, it is imbued with pain and resilience, like a contained cry in the face of oppression.
After the war, Honegger was tired and worn out. He still composed, but illness was eating away at him. His Symphony No. 5, sombre and tense, already seemed to mark a farewell. He died in 1955 in Paris, leaving behind a unique body of work, at the crossroads of eras and influences. An unclassifiable composer, both modern and rooted in tradition, who never ceased to seek a balance between strength and emotion.
Chronology
1892 – Birth in Le Havre
Arthur Honegger was born on 10 March 1892 into a Swiss family living in France. His parents, music lovers, introduced him to music at a very early age. A reserved and studious child, he began playing the violin and the piano from a very young age.
1911 – Departure for the Paris Conservatoire
After studying music at the Zurich Conservatory, he moved to Paris to continue his training. He studied composition with Charles-Marie Widor and became friends with future renowned composers such as Darius Milhaud and Francis Poulenc.
1917 – First significant compositions
He began to make a name for himself with early works that already showed his personal style, somewhere between classical rigour and bold modernity. His Toccata and Variations show his taste for structural clarity and powerful sound.
1920 – The Group of Six
Jean Cocteau brings together six young French composers under an anti-Romantic and anti-Impressionist banner. Honegger is part of the ‘Groupe des Six’, but he stays away from the experiments of his companions. Unlike Milhaud or Poulenc, he does not seek irony or lightness; he prefers large orchestral forms and a powerful musical language.
1923 – Success of Pacific 231
Honegger composed Pacific 231, a symphonic poem inspired by steam locomotives. The piece was a musical revolution: it captured dynamism and mechanical power through unprecedented orchestral textures. This success established his reputation on the international music scene.
1926 – Rugby, an explosion of energy
After the train, he turned his attention to sport with Rugby, an orchestral work that evokes the brutality and strategy of the game. Always on the lookout for new forms of expression, he continued to explore rhythmic force and dramatic tension.
1935 – Jeanne d’Arc au bûcher (Joan of Arc at the Stake)
Honegger composed his dramatic masterpiece, the oratorio Jeanne d’Arc au bûcher, based on a text by Paul Claudel. This moving work, combining narration, chorus and orchestra, illustrates his attachment to historical figures and great emotional depictions.
1939-1945 – War and suffering
Having remained in France during the Occupation, Honegger composed despite the turmoil. His Symphony No. 2, written for strings and solo trumpet, conveys the anguish and resistance to war. This period marks a dark turning point in his work.
1946 – Post-war period and recognition
After the war, he enjoyed a degree of success once again, but his health began to decline. He composed his Symphony No. 3, ‘Liturgical’, a dramatic and intense work that reflects his pessimism about the post-war world.
1950 – Illness and final works
Suffering from a serious heart condition, he nevertheless composed his Symphony No. 5 (1950), in which one senses a profound weariness and gravity. He gradually reduced his activity, but his influence remained strong on 20th-century music.
1955 – Death in Paris
Arthur Honegger died in Paris on 27 November 1955. He left behind an immense body of work, at the crossroads of tradition and modernity, characterised by power, emotion and a perpetual quest for balance between lyricism and rigour.
Characteristics of the music
Between power and emotion
Arthur Honegger’s music reflects his complex personality: rigorous and powerful, but also deeply expressive. He is part of the classical tradition while integrating 20th-century innovations, oscillating between modernity and attachment to the great symphonic forms. Here are the salient features of his musical language.
1. A hybrid style between tradition and modernity
Honegger never adhered to the dominant trends of his time. Although associated with the Group of Six, he shared neither their taste for musical humour nor their total rejection of the past. His music was inspired as much by Bach and Beethoven as by modern composers such as Stravinsky and Mahler.
He retained a pronounced taste for structured form and counterpoint, while integrating more daring harmonies and vigorous rhythms, often marked by raw energy.
2. The power of rhythm and mechanics
Honegger was fascinated by movement and energy, which is evident in several of his works:
Pacific 231 (1923) transforms a steam locomotive into an orchestral fresco in which the acceleration and powerful breath of the train are translated into unprecedented sound textures.
Rugby (1926) evokes the shocks and unpredictable dynamics of a rugby match through syncopated rhythms and a nervous orchestral style.
This taste for rhythmic power makes him a composer with a unique identity, often compared to Prokofiev or Stravinsky.
3. A rich and expressive orchestral style
Honegger exploits the orchestra in a masterly fashion:
His symphonies are constructed with great rigour and a constant search for contrasts of sound.
He favours expressive strings, powerful brass and orchestral mass effects that are sometimes reminiscent of German post-Romanticism.
His orchestration is often dense and dramatic, in the manner of Mahler, but with an economy of means typical of the 20th century.
His symphonies, particularly Symphony No. 2 (1941) and Symphony No. 3 ‘Liturgique’ (1946), show this permanent tension between violence and lyricism.
4. A dramatic and spiritual intensity
While some of Honegger’s works express a raw, mechanical power, others reveal a deep introspection and intense spirituality.
Joan of Arc at the Stake (1935) is a deeply moving oratorio that reveals his attachment to great heroic figures. The music is sometimes austere, sometimes luminous, with a poignant use of the chorus.
His last symphonies, marked by the war, convey an existential angst and a sombre view of humanity.
He does not seek melodic seduction, but authentic and striking expression, sometimes close to the harshness of Bartók.
5. A bold but accessible harmonic language
Honegger avoided the radical atonality and experimentation of the Vienna School (Schoenberg, Berg). He remained rooted in a style in which tonality is always present, even if it is often expanded by dissonant chords and abrupt modulations. His harmonic language is characterised by:
An occasional polytonality, creating expressive tension.
Stacked chords, rich in dissonance, which reinforce the dramatic impact.
A subtle interplay between diatonic and chromaticism, avoiding the rigidity of a classical tonal system.
6. Music that crosses genres
Honegger did not limit himself to a single genre:
Symphonic poems (Pacific 231, Rugby)
Symphonies (five in total, the pillars of his oeuvre)
Stage music and oratorios (Joan of Arc at the Stake)
Film music, in which he demonstrates a talent for illustrating a variety of atmospheres
This diversity testifies to his desire to explore all dimensions of music, without ever allowing himself to be confined by a school of thought or dogma.
Conclusion: music between strength and emotion
Honegger is an unclassifiable composer, who fuses classical rigour with 20th-century modernity. His music oscillates between mechanical movement and dramatic depth, between orchestral power and intimate spirituality. Both visionary and faithful to the forms of the past, he remains an essential figure in 20th-century music, whose work deserves to be rediscovered.
Relationships
Arthur Honegger and his entourage: musical and human relationships
Arthur Honegger was a composer who was both a loner and deeply rooted in his time. Although he was part of the Group of Six, he quickly broke away from them to follow his own path, forging relationships with many composers, performers and personalities from the artistic and intellectual world. Here is an overview of his most significant interactions.
1. The Group of Six: camaraderie and differences
In the 1920s, Honegger was part of the Group of Six, alongside Darius Milhaud, Francis Poulenc, Germaine Tailleferre, Georges Auric and Louis Durey. This collective, under the influence of Jean Cocteau and Erik Satie, advocated for simpler music, as opposed to romanticism and impressionism.
But Honegger, although close to his colleagues, did not entirely share their aesthetic. He preferred a more serious and structured style, sometimes approaching German post-romanticism and Bach’s counterpoint. Milhaud and Poulenc favoured light and ironic music, while he sought power and dramatic intensity.
Despite these differences, he remained on good terms with them, occasionally collaborating on certain projects.
2. Jean Cocteau: an ambivalent relationship
Jean Cocteau, writer and influential figure of the Group of Six, was one of the movement’s main theorists. He saw Honegger as a musical ally, but their relationship was complex. Cocteau favoured simple and accessible music, while Honegger remained attached to large orchestral forms and contrapuntal developments.
Although they collaborated briefly, particularly to promote the Group of Six, Honegger did not remain under Cocteau’s direct influence and quickly went his own way.
3. Paul Claudel: a spiritual and artistic ally
Honegger’s most significant collaboration with a writer was undoubtedly Jeanne d’Arc au bûcher (Joan of Arc at the Stake, 1935) with Paul Claudel. Claudel, poet and playwright, wrote a dense and dramatic text on the life of Joan of Arc ,
which Honegger set to music with striking intensity.
The oratorio, combining choirs, spoken narratives and orchestral music, became one of Honegger’s masterpieces. It also demonstrates the composer’s attachment to great historical and spiritual figures.
4. Ida Rubinstein: an inspiring patron and performer
The famous dancer and patron Ida Rubinstein, who had commissioned Boléro from Ravel, also supported Honegger. She was the one who commissioned him to write Jeanne d’Arc au bûcher, playing a crucial role in the creation of this work.
Rubinstein, through her charisma and stage presence, helped bring Honegger’s music to life by playing Joan of Arc at the first performances. Their collaboration testifies to the composer’s interest in theatre and dramatic expressiveness.
5. Charles Munch and other conductors
Several great conductors played a key role in the dissemination of Honegger’s music. Charles Munch, a Franco-German conductor, was an ardent advocate of his symphonies, particularly the Second and the ‘Liturgical’ Third.
Other conductors such as Ernest Ansermet, also Swiss, and Paul Paray, helped to make his symphonic works known throughout Europe.
6. The relationship with cinema: Abel Gance and other directors
Honegger did not limit himself to concert music; he was also one of the first composers to devote himself to film music. His most famous collaboration was with Abel Gance, director of Napoleon (1927).
He composed several scores for the cinema, exploring a more direct and accessible style. His sense of rhythm and dramatic tension made him an ideal composer for the big screen.
7. Personal relationships: solitude and loyalty
On a personal level, Honegger was known for his reserved and serious character. He married the pianist Andrée Vaurabourg, but their relationship was unusual: because of his need for concentration when composing, Honegger lived apart from her, although they remained married all their lives.
He also maintained strong friendships with musicians such as Igor Stravinsky, whom he admired for his rhythmic audacity, although he did not completely adhere to his neoclassical aesthetic.
During the Second World War, while other composers left France, Honegger chose to remain in Paris, despite the risks. This decision was sometimes criticised, but it demonstrated his attachment to his adopted country.
Conclusion: a composer between independence and collaborations
Arthur Honegger was a man apart: although he rubbed shoulders with the greatest musicians and artists of his time, he always remained true to himself. His music, between modernity and tradition, finds its essence in his varied exchanges with writers, performers, conductors and filmmakers.
At the crossroads of influences, he never followed a single path, preferring to blaze his own trail, between raw energy and spirituality, orchestral power and intimate expressiveness.
Similar composers
Arthur Honegger occupies a unique place in the history of 20th-century music, oscillating between modernity and tradition, expressiveness and formal rigour. Other composers shared some of his stylistic concerns, whether in their orchestral approach, their taste for large symphonic forms, or their attachment to energetic and dramatic music. Here are a few composers who have similarities with him.
1. Paul Hindemith (1895-1963): rigour and power
Hindemith and Honegger share a dense and rigorous orchestral writing style, often characterised by a strong presence of counterpoint. Both distrusted the excesses of Romanticism and sought to structure their music with an almost architectural logic.
Hindemith, like Honegger, avoided radical atonality and preferred an extensive harmonic language that was always anchored in a certain tonality.
His ‘Mathis der Maler’ Symphony (1934) and his concertos show an energy comparable to that of Honegger, with a similar rhythmic and orchestral power.
Both composed in a context troubled by war, and their works reflect a certain tension in the face of history.
2. Sergei Prokofiev (1891-1953): rhythmic and dramatic energy
Although more exuberant and sometimes more ironic than Honegger, Prokofiev shares with him a taste for incisive rhythms and percussive orchestration.
His Alexander Nevsky (1938) and Symphony No. 5 (1944) evoke the same dramatic power as Honegger’s symphonies.
There is a similarity between Pacific 231 and some of Prokofiev’s orchestral pieces, notably Scythian Suite, where mechanical dynamism is emphasised.
Both write narrative and evocative music, Prokofiev in his ballets and Honegger in his oratorios such as Jeanne d’Arc au bûcher.
3. Dmitri Shostakovich (1906-1975): tension and spirituality
Shostakovich and Honegger share a complex relationship with war and politics, and their music reflects a constant dramatic tension.
Shostakovich’s Symphony No. 7 ‘Leningrad’ (1941), written under Nazi occupation, and Honegger’s Symphony No. 2, composed in the middle of World War II, have similar atmospheres, full of suffering and resistance.
Both composers use massive orchestral textures and contrasts of extreme tension, without falling into total abstraction.
There is a spiritual gravity in their later works, such as Honegger’s ‘Liturgical’ Symphony No. 3 and Shostakovich’s Symphony No. 15.
4. Bohuslav Martinů (1890-1959): modern lyricism and an energetic style
The Czech composer Bohuslav Martinů’s musical language is close to that of Honegger, combining clear orchestration, fluid polyphony and a marked rhythmic energy.
His Symphony No. 4 (1945) is reminiscent of Honegger’s orchestral works in its dynamism and its balance between tradition and modernity.
Like Honegger, Martinů composed at the frontier between neoclassicism and a freer style, integrating a spiritual dimension into his later works.
Both shared a certain attachment to symphonic forms and large orchestral frescoes.
5. Albert Roussel (1869-1937): rigour and energy
Albert Roussel, although from a generation before Honegger, adopted a musical approach that is reminiscent of the Swiss composer.
His taste for well-constructed forms and dazzling orchestrations brings him closer to Honegger, particularly in his Symphony No. 3 (1930).
Like Honegger, he is attracted to mechanical and dynamic evocations, particularly in Bacchus et Ariane (1930).
Their style shares a dramatic tension and a marked rhythmic force, while remaining within an accessible aesthetic.
6. Olivier Messiaen (1908-1992): spirituality and expressiveness
Messiaen and Honegger have very different styles, but they come together in their search for an expressive musical language charged with spirituality.
Honegger’s Jeanne d’Arc au bûcher and Messiaen’s Saint François d’Assise share a narrative and mystical ambition.
Both use choirs and orchestration to create almost mystical atmospheres.
Honegger remains more rooted in the classical orchestral tradition, while Messiaen explores new harmonic and rhythmic modes.
7. Igor Stravinsky (1882-1971): energy and controlled modernity
Although Honegger was not a direct disciple of Stravinsky, his interest in rhythm, mechanics and orchestral clarity sometimes evokes the composer of The Rite of Spring.
Rugby by Honegger and The Wedding by Stravinsky share a primitive rhythmic force.
Both avoid total atonality and prefer a modulating style rich in contrasts.
Stravinsky, with his neoclassicism, and Honegger, with his attachment to the great forms, both sought to renew orchestral music without totally deconstructing it.
Conclusion: a composer between tradition and modernity
Arthur Honegger is a composer who stands at the crossroads of influences:
He shares the formal rigour of a Hindemith or a Roussel.
His rhythmic energy and dynamic orchestration are reminiscent of Prokofiev and Stravinsky.
His dramatic expressiveness and spiritual tension bring him closer to Shostakovich and Messiaen.
In short, Honegger is one of those 20th-century composers who were able to renew the symphonic tradition while integrating modern influences, without ever falling into pure experimentation. It is this duality between power and expressiveness that makes him unique, while placing him in a line of innovative musicians deeply engaged in their time.
Famous works for solo piano
Arthur Honegger is not particularly known for his works for solo piano, as he is better known for his orchestral music, chamber music and oratorios. However, he did compose several pieces for piano, some of which are worth mentioning.
Famous works for solo piano by Arthur Honegger:
Prelude, Arioso and Fughette on the name of BACH (1917)
A contrapuntal piece inspired by Johann Sebastian Bach, using the motif B-A-C-H (B flat – A – C – B).
Shows his interest in the rigour of counterpoint and the heritage of the past.
Seven short pieces (1919-1920)
A collection of pieces with varied atmospheres, exploring modern and expressive textures.
Demonstrates his personal harmonic language, between expanded tonality and impressionist touches.
Homage to Ravel (1932)
A short but dense piece, in homage to Maurice Ravel.
A blend of rhythmic elegance and refined writing, influenced by Ravel’s style but with Honegger’s own energy.
Toccata and Variations (1916-1918)
A virtuoso work that alternates energetic passages with more lyrical moments.
Its dynamism is reminiscent of Bach’s or Prokofiev’s toccatas.
Piece for solo piano (1920)
A short, introspective work that reflects his post-Group of Six period.
Although these works are not as well known as those of composers such as Ravel or Debussy, they show a more intimate aspect of Honegger’s music, which is often influenced by counterpoint and a marked rhythmic energy.
Famous works
Arthur Honegger is best known for his orchestral works, oratorios and chamber music. Here are his most famous works, categorised by genre:
1. Orchestral works
Pacific 231 (1923) → Symphonic poem imitating the power and rhythm of a steam locomotive.
Rugby (1928) → Another symphonic poem, inspired by the intensity and dynamism of a rugby match.
Symphony No. 2 (1941) → Composed in the middle of the Second World War, for strings and solo trumpet in the last movement.
Symphony No. 3 ‘Liturgique’ (1946) → A sombre and dramatic work, marked by the traumas of war.
Symphony No. 5 ‘Di tre re’ (1950) → An austere and powerful symphony, each movement ending on the note D.
2. Oratorios and vocal music
Jeanne d’Arc au bûcher (Joan of Arc at the Stake, 1935) → Dramatic oratorio with text by Paul Claudel, combining choirs, spoken narratives and orchestra.
Le Roi David (King David, 1921) → Oratorio retracing the life of the biblical king, with imaginative orchestration and powerful choirs.
Nicolas de Flue (1940) → Oratorio on the Swiss mystic, in a solemn and introspective style.
3. Chamber music
Sonatine for violin and cello (1932) → Concise and expressive work, with a fluid dialogue between the two instruments.
Sonata for violin and piano No. 1 (1918) → A work still influenced by Romanticism, with great lyrical intensity.
String Quartet No. 2 (1936) → A dense, contrapuntal work, influenced by Beethoven and Bach.
4. Music for solo instruments and orchestra
Concerto for cello and orchestra (1929) → A virtuoso and lyrical work, combining power and expressiveness.
Concerto da camera (1948) → For flute, English horn and string orchestra, with a delicate and transparent writing.
5. Film music
Napoléon (1927, for Abel Gance) → One of the first great film scores, full of epic breath.
Les Misérables (1934) → A dramatic score accompanying the film adaptation of Victor Hugo’s novel.
These works illustrate Honegger’s varied style, ranging from orchestral power to spiritual depth, with a marked rhythmic energy and intense lyricism.
(This article was generated by ChatGPT. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)
Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube
Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify
