Tag: English Language

Posted on

Notes on Paul Dukas and His Works

Overview

Paul Dukas (1865-1935) was a French composer, music critic and teacher, often associated with Impressionism although he had a more rigorous and classical style than Debussy or Ravel. He is best known for The Sorcerer’s Apprentice (1897), a symphonic poem made famous by its use in Disney’s Fantasia.

Dukas was a perfectionist and self-taught, destroying many works he considered unsatisfactory. His catalogue is therefore relatively small. His other notable compositions include the Symphony in C (1896), the opera Ariane et Barbe-Bleue (1907), and the Piano Sonata (1901), an imposing work influenced by Beethoven and Franck.

He also had an outstanding career as a professor at the Paris Conservatory, influencing composers such as Olivier Messiaen and Maurice Duruflé. His style combines great contrapuntal and orchestral mastery with a refined sensitivity, oscillating between classicism and modernity.

History

Paul Dukas was born in 1865 in Paris into a cultured family with little interest in music. His interest in the art form emerged rather late, after a prolonged convalescence during his adolescence. He entered the Paris Conservatoire in 1881, where he became friends with Claude Debussy. Although brilliant, he failed to win the prestigious Prix de Rome, which left a deep mark on him and fuelled his pathological perfectionism.

A tireless and demanding worker, Dukas forged a reputation as a rigorous composer, with a meticulous and dense style of writing. In 1897, he enjoyed resounding success with The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, inspired by a poem by Goethe. This work, performed by a lively and colourful orchestra, made him famous far beyond academic circles. Yet Dukas remained dissatisfied with himself. He composed little and destroyed many of his manuscripts, refusing to allow works he considered imperfect to remain.

His only symphony, in 1896, reflects his admiration for Beethoven and César Franck. He then turned to opera with Ariane et Barbe-Bleue (1907), a sumptuous score in the tradition of Debussy’s Pelléas et Mélisande. Despite its qualities, the work did not achieve lasting popular success.

As the 20th century progressed and new musical trends emerged, Dukas gradually withdrew from the creative scene. His perfectionism prevented him from publishing other great works. He then devoted himself to teaching and became a professor at the Paris Conservatory, influencing future great composers such as Olivier Messiaen.

Discreet and reserved, he lived his last years in relative solitude, continuing to write and critique the music of his time, but without publishing any major works after La Plainte, au loin, du faune… (1920). He died in 1935, leaving behind a brief but intensely musical legacy, marked by a subtle blend of classicism and modernity.

Chronology

Youth and education (1865-1890)
1 October 1865: Born in Paris into a Jewish family of German origin.
1881: Enrolled at the Paris Conservatoire, where he studied composition with Ernest Guiraud.
1886: Wins second prize in the Prix de Rome but fails to win the first, which has a lasting impact on him.
Late 1880s: Begins to compose his first works, but destroys a large part of his scores.
Debut and recognition (1890-1900)
1892: Composes Polyeucte, an overture inspired by Corneille, which reveals his dense and dramatic style.
1896: Premiere of his Symphony in C major, which shows his admiration for Beethoven and Franck.
1897: Striking success of The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, a symphonic poem inspired by a text by Goethe, which becomes his most famous work.
Apogee and opera (1900-1910)
1901: Completed his Piano Sonata in E flat minor, an imposing work influenced by Liszt and Beethoven.
1907: Premiere of his only opera, Ariane et Barbe-Bleue, inspired by Maeterlinck, which received a mixed reception but was recognised for its rich orchestration.
Teaching career and gradual retirement (1910-1930)
1912: Composes the Villanelle for horn and piano, a virtuoso work that has become a classic in the horn repertoire.
1914-1918: Remains discreet during the First World War, devoting himself to teaching and music criticism.
1920: Publishes La Plainte, au loin, du faune…, a tribute to Debussy, which would be one of his last works.
1928: Becomes professor of composition at the Paris Conservatory, training students such as Olivier Messiaen and Maurice Duruflé.
Final years and death (1930-1935)
1930-1935: Retires from composition and devotes himself entirely to teaching and criticism.
17 May 1935: Dies in Paris at the age of 69.

Dukas leaves behind a small catalogue of exceptionally high quality, characterised by extreme perfectionism and a balance between tradition and modernity.

Characteristics of the music

Paul Dukas’ music is characterised by formal rigour, dense writing and a subtle balance between tradition and modernity. His style reflects both the legacy of late Romanticism and a sensitivity specific to the Impressionist and Symbolist movements of his time.

1. Extreme perfectionism
Dukas was known for his uncompromising artistic standards. He destroyed most of the works he considered imperfect, which explains the rarity of his catalogue. Each piece that has come down to us is therefore a masterpiece, without any complacency or ease.

2. A classical and Beethovenian heritage
His Symphony in C (1896) and his Piano Sonata (1901) reveal a rigorous style of composition, influenced by Beethoven, César Franck and Saint-Saëns. He favoured solid structures and in-depth thematic development, often marked by great expressive power.

3. Refined and colourful orchestration
Dukas was a talented orchestrator, capable of subtle nuances and striking contrasts. The Sorcerer’s Apprentice (1897) illustrates this virtuosity, with a brilliant and narrative instrumentation that serves the whimsical character of the symphonic poem.

4. An impressionist influence, but a controlled one
Although he was a contemporary of Debussy and a friend of Ravel, Dukas never completely abandoned the blurred harmonies and open structures of Impressionism. His opera Ariane et Barbe-Bleue (1907) uses harmonic colours similar to Debussy’s, but with a more assertive and dramatic construction.

5. A refined harmonic language, between modality and chromaticism
Dukas mixes traditional harmony with subtle innovations. He uses bold modulations, enriched chords and rigorous contrapuntal writing, but always in the service of clarity and expressiveness.

6. An expressiveness that is both noble and dramatic
His music oscillates between deep lyricism and dramatic tension, particularly in his opera and sonata. Even in lighter works such as Villanelle for horn (1912), we find a concern for detail and direct expressiveness.

In short, Dukas was a composer at a crossroads: between romanticism and modernity, rigour and sensitivity, classicism and orchestral daring. His perfectionism prevented him from producing a vast catalogue, but each of his works displays a high degree of artistic rigour.

Relationships

Paul Dukas was a discreet, reserved man, but respected by his contemporaries. He maintained relationships with several composers, performers and intellectuals of his time, although his perfectionism and demanding nature sometimes kept him away from social circles. Here is an overview of his relationships with various personalities:

Relationships with composers

Claude Debussy: A friend and classmate at the Paris Conservatoire, Dukas admired Debussy’s talent but had a more rigorous and classical approach to music. He was one of the first to recognise the genius of Pelléas et Mélisande, which he defended in his musical reviews. After Debussy’s death in 1918, he paid tribute to him with La Plainte, au loin, du faune… (1920).

Maurice Ravel: Dukas and Ravel knew and respected each other well. Although their styles differed, Dukas admired Ravel’s originality and orchestral mastery. Ravel, for his part, considered Dukas a composer of great integrity.

Vincent d’Indy: Dukas shared with d’Indy an interest in formal solidity and counterpoint, although he was less dogmatic than the latter in his musical vision.

Gabriel Fauré: Dukas had a cordial relationship with Fauré, who was a central figure in French music at the time. As a critic, he appreciated the finesse and elegance of his style.

Olivier Messiaen and Maurice Duruflé: As a professor at the Paris Conservatory, Dukas influenced young composers, including Messiaen and Duruflé. Messiaen spoke with respect of his teaching, emphasising his exacting standards and his profound knowledge of the repertoire.

Relations with performers and orchestras

Édouard Colonne: The conductor Édouard Colonne was one of the first to conduct The Sorcerer’s Apprentice in 1897, contributing to the work’s resounding success.

Charles Münch: Although he was from a younger generation, Münch championed Dukas‘ music and conducted The Sorcerer’s Apprentice in numerous concerts.

Robert Casadesus and Walter Gieseking: These pianists performed Dukas’ Piano Sonata, a technically demanding and monumental work.

Relations with intellectuals and non-musicians

Maurice Maeterlinck: The Belgian poet and playwright, author of Pelléas et Mélisande, wrote the libretto for Ariane et Barbe-Bleue, set to music by Dukas in 1907. The opera, although less well known than Pelléas, shares the symbolist atmosphere dear to Maeterlinck.

Walt Disney: Although Dukas never met Disney, his The Sorcerer’s Apprentice was immortalised in Fantasia (1940). This choice shows the extent to which his work had left its mark on the collective imagination, even beyond the classical world.

Paul Valéry: Dukas was interested in literature and frequented intellectual circles where he met writers such as Valéry, with whom he shared a quest for perfection and high artistic standards.

A respected but discreet musician

Despite these numerous connections, Dukas remained aloof from the great artistic debates of his time. His perfectionism and severity towards himself meant that he published little, but he was deeply respected for his musical integrity.

Similar composers

Paul Dukas occupies a unique place in the history of French music: his style is at the crossroads of late Romanticism, Symbolism and Impressionism, while remaining attached to a formal rigour inherited from Classicism. Here are a few composers who share similarities with him, whether in their orchestral writing, their perfectionism or their musical aesthetics.

1. Maurice Ravel (1875-1937)

Although more daring harmonically and rhythmically, Ravel shared with Dukas a taste for sumptuous orchestration and highly elaborate writing. The colourful orchestrations of Daphnis et Chloé and La Valse recall Dukas’ attention to clarity and orchestral textures in The Sorcerer’s Apprentice.

2. Vincent d’Indy (1851-1931)

Like Dukas, d’Indy was greatly influenced by Beethoven and César Franck. His attachment to counterpoint and classical forms can be found in the Symphonie sur un chant montagnard français (Symphony on a French Mountain Song, 1886). Both were also renowned teachers, keen to pass on demanding musical knowledge.

3. Albert Roussel (1869-1937)

Roussel and Dukas share a rigorous approach to composition, great orchestral mastery and a certain underlying classicism. Roussel, in his Symphony No. 3 or Bacchus and Ariadne, offers a style that is both energetic and structured and which can evoke the rigour of Dukas.

4. Henri Duparc (1848-1933)

Like Dukas, Duparc was an extreme perfectionist, to the point of destroying a large part of his work. His melodies, such as L’Invitation au voyage, share with Dukas a refined expressiveness and a taste for subtle harmony.

5. Alexander von Zemlinsky (1871-1942)

Zemlinsky, although Germanic, developed an aesthetic comparable to that of Dukas: a post-romanticism in which orchestral richness and structural rigour are paramount. His opera Der Zwerg has a dramatic density reminiscent of Ariadne auf Naxos and Bluebeard’s Castle.

6. Florent Schmitt (1870-1958)

An eclectic composer, Schmitt mixed impressionism and post-romanticism with flamboyant orchestration, like Dukas. His Psalm XLVII and his ballet The Tragedy of Salome are at times reminiscent of the writing of The Sorcerer’s Apprentice.

7. Charles Koechlin (1867-1950)

Koechlin shared Dukas’s love of refined orchestration and his great musical culture. His taste for orchestral textures and poetic evocation (Les Heures persanes, The Jungle Book) could be compared to the atmosphere of some of Dukas’s works.

Conclusion

Paul Dukas stands halfway between the classicism of Vincent d’Indy and the refined impressionism of Debussy and Ravel. His legacy can be found in composers such as Roussel and Schmitt, who also sought clarity and orchestral power. His formal rigour and perfectionism also echo figures such as Duparc and Zemlinsky, who, like him, favoured quality over quantity.

As a pianist

Paul Dukas was an excellent pianist, although his talent in this field is often overshadowed by his work as a composer and music critic. His piano playing reflected the fundamental qualities of his music: rigour, precision and controlled expressiveness.

Training and influences on the piano

Dukas studied the piano at the Paris Conservatoire, although he did not intend to pursue a career as a virtuoso. He admired Beethoven, Liszt and Franck, whose influence is particularly evident in his Piano Sonata (1901), a monumental work that requires advanced technique and impressive stamina.

His playing was renowned for its clarity and precise articulation, in keeping with his perfectionist approach to composition. He considered the piano as an instrument for experimentation and work, but he did not seek to perform in concert.

Works for piano and technical demands

The Piano Sonata in E flat minor (1901): his most ambitious work for the piano, often compared to the sonatas of Beethoven or Franck. Its dense, contrapuntal writing demands absolute mastery of the keyboard. Few performers have included it in their repertoire because of its difficulty.
Variations, Interlude and Finale on a Theme by Rameau (1902-1903): A mature work in which Dukas pays homage to the French classical spirit while adapting it to his refined harmonic language.
Educational and unfinished pieces: Dukas wrote a few pieces for his students, but he destroyed much of his piano music that he considered imperfect.

Dukas and the pianists of his time

Although he did not perform in concert, Dukas was appreciated by the great pianists of his time.

Walter Gieseking and Robert Casadesus were interested in his Piano Sonata, although it remained on the margins of the repertoire.
Marguerite Long, a great teacher and pianist, respected his piano writing and championed French music from this period.

A pianist before being a composer

Dukas never sought gratuitous virtuosity. His relationship to the piano was above all that of a demanding composer, using the instrument to explore complex musical ideas. His perfectionism led him to publish little, but the works he left behind show an impressive mastery of the keyboard and great musical depth.

Famous works for solo piano

Paul Dukas wrote few works for solo piano, but those that have come down to us are of great richness and technical demand. Here are his main works for solo piano:

1. Piano Sonata in E flat minor (1901)

A monumental and dense work, often compared to the great sonatas of Beethoven and Franck.
Composed in four movements, it is characterised by a rigorous structure, elaborate counterpoint and great dramatic intensity.
Extremely demanding in technical terms, it is rarely played in concert.

2. Variations, Interlude and Finale on a Theme by Rameau (1902-1903)

Suite of variations based on a theme from the opera Les Indes galantes by Jean-Philippe Rameau.
A mixture of homage to the Baroque style and modern piano writing with refined harmonies.
A work of great elegance and considerable technical difficulty.

Lost or unfinished works

Dukas was an extreme perfectionist and destroyed a large part of his works.
We know that he wrote educational pieces for piano, but they have not been published.

Conclusion

Although his catalogue for piano is limited, Dukas’ works are distinguished by their musical depth and rigour. The Piano Sonata and the Variations on a Theme by Rameau are his major contributions to the piano repertoire.

Famous works

Paul Dukas left a small but high-quality catalogue. Apart from his works for solo piano, his most outstanding compositions are:

1. Orchestral

The Sorcerer’s Apprentice (1897) – His most famous work, a symphonic poem inspired by Goethe, known for its brilliant orchestration and dynamic musical narration.
Symphonie en ut majeur (Symphony in C major) (1896) – Dukas’ only symphony, influenced by Beethoven and César Franck, with a solid structure and elaborate contrapuntal writing.
La Plainte, au loin, du faune… (The lament of the faun) (1920) – An orchestral piece in homage to Debussy, of great finesse and subtle impressionist colours.

2. Opera

Ariane et Barbe-Bleue (1907) – His only opera, with a libretto by Maurice Maeterlinck, in the tradition of Debussy’s Pelléas et Mélisande, but with a denser and more dramatic orchestration.

3. Chamber music

Villanelle for horn and piano (1906) – A virtuoso and melodic piece, which has become a classic of the horn repertoire.

4. Choral works

Cantata Velléda (1888) – An early work influenced by the Romantic style.
Cantata Sémélé (1890) – Written for the Prix de Rome, with a demanding and dramatic vocal style.

Conclusion

Dukas, an extreme perfectionist, destroyed a large part of his works. But those that remain bear witness to an impressive mastery, combining classical rigour, dramatic expressiveness and orchestral refinement.

(This article was generated by ChatGPT. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Classic Music Content Page

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Jean-Michel Serres Apfel Café Music QR Codes Center English 2024.

Posted on

Notes on Camille Saint-Saëns and His Works

Overview

Camille Saint-Saëns (1835-1921) was a French composer, pianist and organist, often associated with Romanticism, although he had a more classical approach in his style. A child prodigy, he excelled at the piano and organ from an early age and became a key figure in 19th-century French music.

His work is vast and eclectic, covering all genres: symphonies, concertos, chamber music, operas and sacred music. Among his most famous works are The Carnival of the Animals, Danse Macabre, Samson and Delilah (especially the famous aria My Heart Opens to Your Voice), as well as his Symphony No. 3, known as the Organ Symphony.

Influenced by classical masters such as Mozart and Beethoven, he opposed the more modernist tendencies of Debussy and Ravel, which earned him a sometimes conservative image. However, his sense of refinement, his virtuosity and his talent as an orchestrator remain undeniable.

Until the end of his life, Saint-Saëns travelled extensively and maintained an intense musical activity. His legacy continues to influence classical music, particularly through his ability to combine lyricism and formal rigour.

History

Camille Saint-Saëns was born in 1835 in Paris, but he never knew his father, who died a few months after his birth. He was raised by his mother and his great-aunt, who very quickly realised that he was a child prodigy. He played the piano from the age of two, and was already composing his first pieces by the age of five. He had an exceptional ear: he could reproduce pieces after just one listen and identify notes with just a flick of the ear.

His talent was such that, at the age of ten, he gave his first public concert at the Salle Pleyel, performing concertos by Mozart and Beethoven. However, he was not a dreamy or exuberant child: he was erudite, with a passion for astronomy, literature and archaeology. He loved the arts, but also logic and science. This intellectual rigour would always mark his music.

He entered the Paris Conservatoire at the age of 13, specialised in composition and the organ, and quickly became a recognised virtuoso. At the age of 22, he was appointed organist at the Church of the Madeleine, a prestigious post that he would occupy for twenty years. He dazzled with his talent for improvisation, and even Liszt, then at the height of his fame, considered him the greatest organist of his time.

But Saint-Saëns did not just want to shine as a performer. He also wanted to compose and develop French music, which was largely dominated by opera at the time. He campaigned for the recognition of symphonic and chamber music, genres that were still underdeveloped in France. It was in this spirit that he co-founded the Société Nationale de Musique in 1871, which was intended to promote French composers.

However, while his symphonic and concert works such as Symphony No. 3 with Organ, Danse Macabre and The Carnival of the Animals were successful, it was above all his opera Samson and Delilah that brought him international recognition. Yet he struggled to gain acceptance in certain artistic circles: the younger generations, notably Debussy and Ravel, found him too academic, too attached to classical forms.

In his personal life, Saint-Saëns was a reserved, even distant man. He married in 1875, but the marriage was a failure. After the tragic death of his two young children, he left his wife and never returned to her. From then on, he led a solitary life, travelling extensively, particularly in North Africa, where he found refuge and a source of inspiration.

Until the end of his life, he composed tirelessly, rejecting the avant-garde and remaining faithful to his classical aesthetic. He died in 1921 in Algiers, after a career that lasted more than sixty years. While his conservatism may have earned him criticism, his musical genius and sense of orchestration make him one of the greatest French composers.

Chronology

1835 – Camille Saint-Saëns is born on 9 October in Paris. His father dies shortly after his birth, and he is raised by his mother and his great-aunt.

1837-1840 – He starts playing the piano at the age of two and shows exceptional talent. At the age of five, he is already composing his first pieces.

1846 – At the age of 10, he gave his first public concert at the Salle Pleyel, playing concertos by Mozart and Beethoven.

1848 – He entered the Paris Conservatoire at the age of 13, where he studied the organ and composition.

1853 – He becomes organist at Saint-Merri, then at the Madeleine in 1857, a prestigious post that he will occupy for twenty years.

1855 – He composes his Symphony No. 1, already demonstrating great orchestral mastery.

1861 – He teaches at the Conservatoire Niedermeyer, where his students include Gabriel Fauré.

1871 – After the Franco-Prussian War, he co-founded the Société Nationale de Musique to promote French music.

1875 – He married Marie-Laure Truffot, but their marriage was unhappy.

1877 – His opera Samson et Dalila was premiered in Weimar, under the direction of Liszt, after being refused in France.

1878 – He loses his two young children within a few weeks of each other. Distraught, he leaves his wife shortly afterwards and never returns to her.

1886 – He composes The Carnival of the Animals and his famous Symphony No. 3 with organ, which will become one of his most recognised works.

1890-1910 – He travelled extensively, particularly in North Africa, where he found inspiration and refuge from Parisian life.

1908 – He composed the first film music in history, L’Assassinat du duc de Guise.

1913 – He violently criticised Stravinsky and Debussy, rejecting the modernist developments in music.

1921 – He gave his last concert in November in Dieppe. He died on 16 December in Algiers, at the age of 86.

1922 – His funeral was held in Paris with full state honours. He was laid to rest in the Montparnasse cemetery.

Characteristics of the music

The music of Camille Saint-Saëns is characterised by a balance between tradition and virtuosity, great clarity of writing and a constant search for elegance. He follows in the tradition of classical and romantic composers, while avoiding the excesses of late romanticism. The main characteristics of his style are as follows:

1. A controlled classicism
Although Saint-Saëns was a 19th-century composer, he remained deeply influenced by the classical forms inherited from Mozart and Beethoven. His symphonies, concertos and chamber music works are characterised by a rigorous structure and clarity in the development of themes. He favoured balanced and limpid writing, which contrasted with the more expressive lyricism of composers such as Wagner or Berlioz.

2. Brilliant orchestration
Saint-Saëns was a master of orchestration. He knew how to exploit all the instrumental colours, creating striking effects while remaining within a controlled framework. This orchestral virtuosity can be heard in his Symphony No. 3 with organ, where the organ dialogues beautifully with the orchestra, or in Danse macabre, where the solo violin imitates the creaking sound of a dancing skeleton.

3. Elegant but restrained lyricism
Although his music is imbued with lyricism, particularly in his melodious melodies (such as the aria Mon cœur s’ouvre à ta voix from Samson et Dalila), Saint-Saëns avoids excessive pathos. His lyricism remains restrained, fluid and always guided by a certain modesty.

4. Instrumental virtuosity
Saint-Saëns was a virtuoso pianist and organist, and this is evident in his works for solo instruments. His concertos for piano, violin and cello require great technical mastery. The Piano Concerto No. 2 is particularly formidable, with an almost improvised first movement and a wild finale.
Although attached to classical forms, Saint-Saëns was interested in various musical influences. He introduced exotic elements into certain works, notably with orientalising touches in Samson and Delilah or in his Algerian Suite, inspired by his travels in North Africa.

6. An aversion to impressionism and modernity
Saint-Saëns rejected the new musical trends embodied by Debussy and Stravinsky. He found impressionist harmony too vague and modern music too chaotic. He remained faithful to an aesthetic based on clarity and formal mastery, which sometimes led to him being considered conservative.

7. Accessible and colourful music
Some of his works have a very strong narrative and descriptive dimension. The Carnival of the Animals is a perfect example: each piece evokes an animal with humour and musical ingenuity. Similarly, Danse macabre illustrates a nocturnal Sabbath scene with striking realism.

In short, Saint-Saëns’ music combines elegance, virtuosity and clarity. He was a composer attached to tradition, but also a subtle innovator, capable of drawing on a variety of influences to enrich his musical language.

Impacts & Influences

Impacts and influences of Camille Saint-Saëns

Camille Saint-Saëns played a major role in the evolution of French music and influenced several generations of composers, despite his sometimes conservative image. His influence extends to symphonic music, the concert repertoire, opera and even cinema. Here are the main impacts and influences of his work.

1. A promoter of French symphonic music

In the 19th century, French music was dominated by opera. Saint-Saëns was one of the first to champion and develop symphonic and chamber music in France. By co-founding the Société Nationale de Musique in 1871, he encouraged the creation and dissemination of French orchestral works, paving the way for composers such as César Franck and Paul Dukas.

2. An influence on subsequent generations

Saint-Saëns had a strong influence on several French composers. His most famous pupil, Gabriel Fauré, developed a subtle harmonic language and a refined aesthetic that would in turn influence Ravel and Debussy. Even if the latter took more modernist directions, they inherited Saint-Saëns’s concern for clarity and elegance.

3. A master of orchestration

His fluid and balanced orchestral writing served as a model for many composers, particularly for his sense of instrumental timbres and colours. His Symphony No. 3 with organ inspired many symphonists, notably Camille Chevillard and Charles-Marie Widor, who developed the symphonic organ.

4. An influence on film music

Saint-Saëns was one of the first composers to write original music for a film: L’Assassinat du duc de Guise (1908). His narrative and evocative approach foreshadowed modern film music and influenced composers such as Arthur Honegger and Maurice Jarre.

5. A bridge between classicism and modernity

Although opposed to the musical avant-garde of his time, Saint-Saëns served as a link between the classical tradition and the new musical experiments of the 20th century. His rejection of Impressionist vagueness did not prevent Debussy and Ravel from admiring his limpid writing and formal refinement.

6. An ambassador for French music abroad

Thanks to his international tours and his prestige as a virtuoso, Saint-Saëns helped French music to spread beyond its borders. His influence was particularly strong in Europe and America, where his works were widely performed.

7. A contribution to the revival of music for solo instruments

His concertos for piano, violin and cello remain pillars of the concerto repertoire. Their virtuosity and rigorous construction influenced composers such as Sergei Prokofiev and Francis Poulenc in the composition of their own concertos.

A lasting legacy

Today, Saint-Saëns is recognised as one of the greatest French composers, and his works continue to be performed and recorded. His legacy lies as much in his music as in his role as an advocate of a demanding, clear and elegant French musical tradition.

Old or new, traditional or progressive?

The music of Camille Saint-Saëns is a subtle blend of old and new, of tradition and progress.

An heir to tradition

Saint-Saëns was deeply rooted in the classical tradition. He admired Mozart, Beethoven and Mendelssohn, and his writing respected the well-established classical forms: symphonies in several movements, rigorously structured concertos, balanced chamber music. His orchestration is clear and precise and avoids the excesses of late Romanticism. Unlike Wagner, he did not seek to overturn the forms, but to perfect them.

An innovative spirit in his own way

Although he was attached to tradition, he was not content to imitate the past. He innovated in orchestration (as in Symphony No. 3 with organ), introduced exotic elements (in Samson and Delilah or the Algerian Suite) and explored new genres (The Carnival of the Animals shows an original humorous and descriptive approach). He also composed the first film music in 1908, showing that he was attentive to the developments of his time.

Conservative in the face of new trends

In the last decades of his life, he rejected modernist trends such as Debussy’s impressionism and Stravinsky’s innovations. He criticised their lack of structure and order, preferring clear and logical music. This led to him being considered too academic by the new generations.

A balance between old and new

In short, the music of Saint-Saëns is traditional in its form and composition, but progressive in its orchestration and some of its musical ideas. He is neither a revolutionary like Wagner, nor a nostalgic for the past: he seeks rather to extend and enrich the great classical tradition with finesse and elegance.

Relationships

Camille Saint-Saëns had many relationships with composers, performers, conductors and personalities of his time. Some were marked by admiration and friendship, others by tension and conflict. Here is an overview of his most significant relationships:

1. With other composers

Franz Liszt (1811-1886) – Admiring support

Saint-Saëns and Liszt met in 1857 and developed a mutual admiration. Liszt recognised Saint-Saëns’ exceptional talent as an organist and encouraged him in his career. It was thanks to Liszt that Samson et Dalila was premiered in Weimar in 1877, even though the opera had been refused in France.

Gabriel Fauré (1845-1924) – A teacher-student relationship

Saint-Saëns taught Gabriel Fauré at the Niedermeyer Conservatory. He played a key role in shaping his style and career. Although they remained friends throughout their lives, Fauré adopted a more modern and subtle aesthetic, moving away from the classical rigour of his teacher.

Claude Debussy (1862-1918) – Mutual contempt

Saint-Saëns did not appreciate impressionist music and rejected Debussy’s blurred harmonies, which he found ‘unconstructed’. For his part, Debussy considered him an outdated composer, too attached to classical forms. This rivalry illustrates the conflict between classicism and modernity at the turn of the 20th century.

Maurice Ravel (1875-1937) – A misunderstanding

Like Debussy, Ravel represented a musical evolution that Saint-Saëns rejected. During the 1905 Prix de Rome Competition, Saint-Saëns was on the jury that rejected Ravel, which caused a scandal. Ravel, in return, saw him as a rigid academician who was not very open to new aesthetics.

Richard Wagner (1813-1883) – An admiration thwarted

Saint-Saëns admired Wagner’s orchestral power and was inspired by some of his techniques, but he rejected the ‘excessive’ side and the break with classical tradition. He also criticised Wagner’s excessive influence on French music, which set him at odds with the Wagnerians of his time.

2. With performers and conductors

Pablo de Sarasate (1844-1908) – A dedicated virtuoso
Saint-Saëns wrote his Violin Concerto No. 3 for the Spanish violinist Pablo de Sarasate, who performed it brilliantly. Their collaboration reinforced the success of Saint-Saëns’ works with virtuoso soloists.

Charles Camille Chevillard (1859-1923) – A defender of his music

Chevillard, a conductor, conducted many of Saint-Saëns’ works, notably at the Société des Concerts du Conservatoire, contributing to their dissemination in France.

Leopold Stokowski (1882-1977) – An international ambassador

Stokowski, the famous conductor, admired the Symphony No. 3 with Organ and made it a key piece in the American repertoire. His interpretation influenced the perception of Saint-Saëns in the United States.

3. With people outside the musical world

Jules Massenet (1842-1912) – A friendly rivalry

The two composers were in competition, particularly in the field of opera. Massenet was more popular with the public, which irritated Saint-Saëns, although he respected his talent.

Ferdinand de Lesseps (1805-1894) – A friendship with a businessman

Saint-Saëns admired Lesseps, the engineer of the Suez Canal. He composed a Hymn to Victor Hugo in his honour and shared his enthusiasm for technical and scientific progress.

Émile Zola (1840-1902) – An ideological opposition

Zola and Saint-Saëns opposed each other during the Dreyfus Affair. Saint-Saëns was anti-Dreyfusard and criticised Zola for his support of Captain Dreyfus, which isolated him from the circle of progressive intellectuals.

4. With institutions and orchestras

The Paris Opera – Belated recognition

Although Saint-Saëns composed several operas, he struggled to gain recognition at the Paris Opera. His Samson et Dalila, initially rejected, was not performed there until 1890, long after its success abroad.

The Société des Concerts du Conservatoire – Strong support

This prestigious institution played a major role in the dissemination of his orchestral works in France, notably his Symphony No. 3.

The 1889 World’s Fair – A moment of musical curiosity

During the Paris World’s Fair, Saint-Saëns discovered music from Asia and Africa, which influenced some of his works, particularly his pieces with orientalist colours.

Conclusion

Saint-Saëns was a central figure in the musical world, surrounded by composers, soloists and intellectuals. While he maintained strong friendships with Liszt, Fauré and Sarasate, he was also in conflict with Debussy and Ravel. Both respected and criticised, he left a lasting mark, both in French music and on the international scene.

Similar composers

If we are looking for composers similar to Camille Saint-Saëns, we can consider those who share his attachment to classical forms, brilliant orchestration and melodic elegance, while evolving within an aesthetic of late Romanticism and Post-Romanticism. Here are a few figures close to his style, both in France and abroad.

1. In France: heirs and contemporaries
Gabriel Fauré (1845-1924) – Elegance and harmonic refinement
Fauré was a pupil of Saint-Saëns and shares with him a clear and balanced style of writing. His music, although more delicate and modern in tone, retains a measured lyricism and formal rigour. His works such as the Requiem and the Pavane recall the melodic fluidity and subtle harmony favoured by Saint-Saëns.

Jules Massenet (1842-1912) – The lyricism of opera
Massenet is another great exponent of French music from the end of the 19th century. Unlike Saint-Saëns, he devoted himself almost exclusively to opera (Manon, Werther), but their sense of melody and orchestral elegance bring them together.

Charles Gounod (1818-1893) – Between classicism and romanticism
Gounod, famous for Faust and Roméo et Juliette, shares with Saint-Saëns a meticulous melodic approach and a respect for classical forms, while integrating more expressive elements. His influence on Saint-Saëns is perceptible in some of his vocal and orchestral works.

Paul Dukas (1865-1935) – Between tradition and innovation
Although more modern, Dukas (The Sorcerer’s Apprentice) displays an orchestral mastery and formal clarity reminiscent of Saint-Saëns. He explores rich and colourful orchestrations, in the tradition of his predecessor.

2. In Germany and Austria: the post-Romantic tradition
Felix Mendelssohn (1809-1847) – A major influence
Mendelssohn is often cited as one of Saint-Saëns‘ major inspirations. They share a clarity of writing, a sense of counterpoint inherited from classicism and a taste for orchestral elegance. The Italian Symphony and the Violin Concerto recall the energy and limpidity of Saint-Saëns’ style.

Johannes Brahms (1833-1897) – Restrained Romanticism
Although more Germanic in his harmonic approach, Brahms, like Saint-Saëns, remained attached to classical forms and avoided the expressive excesses of Romantics such as Wagner. His taste for symphony and chamber music made him a composer with a similar temperament.

Max Bruch (1838-1920) – Lyricism and classicism
Bruch, particularly with his Violin Concerto No. 1, recalls the lyricism and elegant virtuosity found in Saint-Saëns. Their concert music shares the same clarity and passion for melody.

3. In Eastern Europe and Russia: classicism and orchestral colours
Antonín Dvořák (1841-1904) – National colours and fluid orchestration
Dvořák, like Saint-Saëns, remained attached to classical forms while integrating folk elements into his music. His Symphony from the New World and his Cello Concerto at times evoke the orchestral richness and melodic balance of the French composer.

Nikolai Rimski-Korsakov (1844-1908) – Orchestral virtuosity and exoticism
Although more daring in his orchestration, Rimski-Korsakov shares with Saint-Saëns a taste for orchestral colour and exotic evocations (Scheherazade, Capriccio Espagnol).

Sergei Rachmaninov (1873-1943) – Between virtuosity and tradition
Rachmaninov is more expressive and romantic than Saint-Saëns, but their pianistic virtuosity and their attachment to classical forms bring them closer together. The Piano Concerto No. 2 and the Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini evoke a comparable elegance and fluidity.

4. Italy and Spain: lyricism and formal rigour
Ottorino Respighi (1879-1936) – Orchestral colours and clarity
Although influenced by Impressionism, Respighi shares with Saint-Saëns a taste for sumptuous orchestration (The Pines of Rome) and formal elegance.

Isaac Albéniz (1860-1909) and Enrique Granados (1867-1916) – Spanish influence and pianistic refinement
Although they are more rooted in Spanish music, these two composers display a pianistic virtuosity and clarity of writing reminiscent of Saint-Saëns.

Conclusion
Saint-Saëns belongs to a generation of composers who sought to reconcile tradition and modernity, virtuosity and clarity. He can be compared to Mendelssohn and Bruch for his romantic classicism, to Fauré for his French elegance, and to Dvořák for his orchestral richness. He remains a unique composer, but his musical affinities cross borders and styles.

As a music teacher

Camille Saint-Saëns as a music teacher and his pedagogical contribution

Camille Saint-Saëns was an influential teacher, although his time in education was relatively brief. He left his mark on several generations of musicians, particularly through his role at the École Niedermeyer and his advice to young composers and performers. His pedagogical approach reflected his attachment to the classical tradition and technical rigour, while encouraging a certain artistic freedom.

1. Professor at the Niedermeyer School (1861-1865): teaching based on tradition

In 1861, at the age of just 26, Saint-Saëns was appointed piano professor at the Niedermeyer School, a Parisian institution specialising in the training of church musicians. Although the emphasis at the school was on sacred music and Gregorian chant, Saint-Saëns brought a broader vision to the institution, emphasising the importance of the classical masters and including works by Beethoven, Schumann and Liszt in his teaching.

His aim was to train musicians with a solid technical grounding, capable of understanding the structure and balance of music. He emphasised clarity of playing, rhythmic precision and mastery of counterpoint.

2. Influence on his students: the case of Gabriel Fauré

Gabriel Fauré was Saint-Saëns’ most famous student at the Niedermeyer School. Fauré deeply admired his teacher and maintained a lasting relationship of friendship and mutual respect with him. Saint-Saëns opened the doors of the Parisian musical world to him and introduced him to the music of Wagner, Liszt and Schumann.

Under his influence, Fauré developed a subtle harmonic style and a sense of elegance that would leave its mark on 20th-century French music. In return, Fauré adopted a more modernist approach than Saint-Saëns, who would end up criticising certain developments in French music after Debussy.

Other notable pupils included André Messager, who became a respected composer and conductor, and Eugène Gigout, a renowned organist and composer.

3. A mentor and guide for young musicians

Even after leaving the Niedermeyer School in 1865, Saint-Saëns continued to help young composers and performers. He advised pianists and conductors, and shared his expertise on orchestration and composition. He encouraged the rigorous learning of the musician’s craft, but he was often sceptical of modernist tendencies.

His influence is particularly strong in the field of orchestration and symphonic music in France. He played a key role in the recognition of instrumental music in a country then dominated by opera.

4. An indirect teacher: his writings and his legacy

Saint-Saëns was not a long-term institutional teacher, but he contributed to the transmission of musical knowledge through his writings and lectures. He published essays and articles on music, including:

‘Harmonie et mélodie’ (Harmony and melody) (1885), in which he defended the clarity of classical music and criticised the excesses of modernism.
Articles on interpretation and the importance of respecting ancient styles.

His role in the creation of the Société Nationale de Musique in 1871 also contributed to the training of young composers by providing a space for French instrumental music, thus promoting figures such as César Franck and Vincent d’Indy.

Conclusion

Saint-Saëns was a demanding teacher, attached to classical traditions, but open to the transmission of musical knowledge. His pedagogical influence is measured above all through Fauré and his students, who left their mark on the evolution of French music, and through his writings and his institutional work. More than just a teacher, he was a transmitter of knowledge, the guarantor of a certain conception of music, at the crossroads of classicism and romanticism.

Famous works for solo piano

Famous works for solo piano by Camille Saint-Saëns
Although Camille Saint-Saëns is best known for his piano concertos, his Symphony No. 3, and The Carnival of the Animals, he also wrote numerous pieces for solo piano. His pianistic style combines great virtuosity inherited from Liszt and clarity of writing inspired by Mozart and Mendelssohn. Here are some of his most outstanding works for solo piano.

1. Études (Virtuosity and technical refinement)

Six Études, Op. 52 (1877)

These études are among his most technically demanding pieces. They explore different aspects of pianistic playing, in particular velocity and independence of the fingers.

Étude No. 6 in F minor – This piece is one of the best known in the collection, with swirling arpeggios and a sound similar to the études of Chopin and Liszt.

Études for the Left Hand Alone, Op. 135 (1912-1913)

One of the first examples of works for the left hand alone, even before Ravel (Concerto for the Left Hand). These highly technical études are designed to develop the flexibility and expressiveness of the left hand.

2. Rhapsodies and Variations (Imagination and Orchestral Colours)

Rhapsodie d’Auvergne, Op. 73 (1884)

Inspired by the popular melodies of the Auvergne region, this colourful piece illustrates Saint-Saëns’ interest in regional folklore. Its fluid writing and its dance-like character make it an original piece in the French piano repertoire.

Variations on a Theme by Beethoven, Op. 35 (1874)

This work takes as its theme the Minuet from Beethoven’s Piano Sonata No. 18. Saint-Saëns deploys all his contrapuntal and harmonic skill in this piece, recalling the influence of Liszt and Mendelssohn.

3. Poems and evocations (Expression and spirituality)

The spinning wheel of Omphale, Op. 31 (1871) – Piano version

Originally a symphonic poem, this work evokes Queen Omphale’s spinning through delicate, undulating motifs. The piano version is very demanding technically, but retains its hypnotic atmosphere.

Prelude and Fugue, Op. 99 (1894)

A tribute to the Baroque style, reminiscent of Bach, but with Romantic harmonies and virtuoso piano writing.

4. Short pieces and miniatures (Elegance and clarity)

Valse nonchalante, Op. 110 (1899)

A waltz full of charm and elegance, with a touch of humour and virtuosity. It follows in the tradition of Chopin’s waltzes, while having a typically French lightness.

Caprice arabe, Op. 96 (1884)

Saint-Saëns explores oriental sounds here, in a piece with sinuous motifs and exotic harmonies. This work illustrates his interest in orchestral colours transposed to the piano.

Allegro appassionato, Op. 70 (1884)

A lively and energetic piece, often compared to Schubert’s impromptus or Liszt’s études.

Conclusion

For Saint-Saëns, solo piano is a field of experimentation where virtuosity, clarity and refinement come together. His études remain among the most impressive in the French repertoire, while his more poetic pieces such as Le Rouet d’Omphale or Rhapsodie d’Auvergne reveal a narrative and colourful sense that heralds Debussy and Ravel. His piano work, although less well known than his concertos, bears witness to his genius and musical elegance.

(This article was generated by ChatGPT. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Classic Music Content Page

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Jean-Michel Serres Apfel Café Music QR Codes Center English 2024.

Posted on

Notes on Charles-Valentin Alkan and His Works

Overview

Charles-Valentin Alkan (1813-1888) was a French composer and virtuoso pianist, often considered one of the greatest pianists of the 19th century, alongside Liszt and Chopin. He was renowned for his incredible technique, his extraordinary musical imagination and his daring use of harmony and structure.

A mysterious virtuoso
Alkan was a piano prodigy from a very young age, admitted to the Paris Conservatoire at just six years old. He was a major figure on the Parisian piano scene, but gradually withdrew from public life, living as a virtual recluse for long periods. His enigmatic character and his withdrawal from the musical world contributed to his reputation as a solitary and unrecognised artist.

Extremely difficult music
His work is characterised by a formidable technical rigour, often compared to that of Liszt. His most famous pieces include:

The Four Ages (opus 33), a series of pieces describing human life through increasing difficulties,
Symphony for Solo Piano and Concerto for Solo Piano (excerpts from Études in all the Major Keys, opus 39), which give the piano an orchestral dimension,
Aesop’s Feast, a brilliant and imaginative variation, often performed as an encore.
A belated rediscovery
Alkan fell into oblivion after his death, eclipsed by his contemporaries such as Liszt and Chopin. However, his genius was rediscovered in the 20th century, thanks in particular to pianists such as Raymond Lewenthal, Marc-André Hamelin and Ronald Smith, who restored his work to honour.

His style oscillates between extreme romanticism, harmonic daring foreshadowing Debussy, and a virtuosity that defies the limits of the instrument. Today, he is considered a cult composer, whose music fascinates with its intensity and originality.

History

Charles-Valentin Alkan was a unique figure of the 19th century, a prodigious pianist and visionary composer whose life oscillated between moments of glory and mysterious withdrawal. Born in 1813 in Paris into a Jewish family of Alsatian origin, he showed exceptional musical talent from a very early age. He entered the Paris Conservatoire at the age of just six and quickly won first prizes in music theory, piano and harmony. His talent was such that he attracted the attention of the most prestigious circles in the capital, becoming friends with Chopin, Liszt and other great musicians of his time.

In his youth, Alkan was an admired pianist. His dazzling technique and bold writing made him one of the great Parisian virtuosos. But unlike Liszt, who sought the limelight and the crowds, Alkan already seemed to cultivate a certain distance from the musical world. Although he played in influential salons and gave a few resounding concerts, he gradually disappeared from the public scene from the 1840s onwards, without anyone knowing exactly why. Some mention a deep disappointment when he was removed from the post of professor at the Conservatory, others simply see it as an introverted and perfectionist temperament.

Retreating to his apartment in the Marais, Alkan continued to compose, producing some of the most daring and technically demanding piano works ever written. His Concerto for Solo Piano, taken from his Études dans tous les tons majeurs, is a work of wild ambition, simulating an entire orchestra under the fingers of a single pianist. His pieces often combine a striking dramatic intensity with a harmonic erudition that at times foreshadows Debussy. But despite the grandeur of his music, he remains in the shadows, eclipsed by Liszt and Chopin, whose music is more immediately accessible.

His life ended in the same mystery that had shrouded him for decades. He died in 1888, and a persistent legend has it that he was crushed under a bookcase while looking for a book. In reality, he seems to have succumbed to a simple illness. Whatever the case, his name gradually faded into oblivion, and it was not until the 20th century that his work was rediscovered by passionate pianists, fascinated by the extreme virtuosity and originality of his music.

Today, Alkan remains a cult figure, a composer apart, whose music, both monumental and eccentric, challenges pianists and intrigues listeners. His journey, made up of solitude and genius, places him among the great enigmas of musical Romanticism.

Chronology

1813 – Birth in Paris
Charles-Valentin Alkan Morhange was born on 30 November in Paris, into a Jewish family of Alsatian origin. His father was a music teacher and director of a music school for children.

1819-1826 – Child prodigy and Paris Conservatoire
At the age of six, Alkan entered the Paris Conservatoire, where he studied music theory, organ and, above all, piano. He quickly won several first prizes, notably in piano at the age of twelve.

1826-1830 – First successes and beginnings as a composer
He begins to make a name for himself as a pianist and composes his first published works. He frequents Parisian salons and befriends Chopin, Liszt and other major figures of Romanticism.

1830-1840 – Rapid rise in the music world
Alkan is considered one of the most brilliant pianists of his time. He gives acclaimed concerts in Paris and publishes increasingly daring works. His technique is often compared to that of Liszt.

1840-1853 – Mysterious withdrawal from public life
Around 1840, he almost completely disappeared from the music scene. The reasons remain unclear: some think he was disappointed at not obtaining a post at the Conservatoire, others mention his introverted temperament. During this period, he composed works of extraordinary complexity in silence.

1853-1870 – Gradual return and creative peak
In 1853, Alkan reappeared and gave a few private concerts at the home of his friend Élie-Miriam Delaborde. He published his most ambitious works, notably the Concerto for Solo Piano and the Symphony for Solo Piano (in the Études dans tous les tons majeurs, Op. 39). His style is characterised by extreme virtuosity and an avant-garde harmonic richness.

1870-1888 – Final years and solitude
He retreated once again to his apartment in the Marais, devoting himself to composition and the study of religious texts. He published a few more pieces, but rarely played in public. His influence remained limited, and he gradually fell into oblivion.

1888 – Death and posterity
On 29 March, Alkan died in Paris at the age of 74. A persistent legend claims that he died after being crushed under a bookcase while looking for a book, but it seems more likely that he succumbed to an illness. His work was rediscovered in the 20th century thanks to pianists such as Raymond Lewenthal, Ronald Smith and Marc-André Hamelin.

Today, he is recognised as one of the greatest 19th-century composers for the piano, at the crossroads of Romanticism and a modernity that prefigured Debussy and Ravel.

Characteristics of the music

The music of Charles-Valentin Alkan is a unique fusion of transcendent virtuosity, harmonic audacity and profound expressiveness. It is distinguished by its extreme technical demands, its structural complexity and its often visionary harmonic language, foreshadowing certain trends of the 20th century.

1. Excessive virtuosity

Alkan was one of the most technically demanding composers of his time, rivalling Liszt. His pieces require absolute mastery of the keyboard, with ultra-fast strokes, dizzying leaps, complex polyphonies and formidable independence of the hands. For example, his Concerto for Solo Piano (from Études dans tous les tons majeurs, Op. 39) simulates an entire orchestra with a single instrument, while Le Festin d’Ésope features a series of variations that are as brilliant as they are unpredictable.

2. Orchestral writing for the piano

Alkan often used the piano as a miniature orchestra. He pushed the instrument to its limits, exploiting all its sound resources:

Massive chords and rapid octaves to evoke symphonic power (Symphony for Solo Piano),
complex polyphonic textures imitating several voices (Grande Sonate ‘Les Quatre Âges’),
extreme register effects to create spatialised sound effects.

3. Harmonic and formal audacity

His music is distinguished by a great harmonic richness, sometimes surprisingly modern:

He uses abrupt and unexpected modulations, sometimes over several distant degrees,
He explores unusual chord progressions, heralding Debussy and Scriabin.
He uses highly personal forms, going beyond the classical framework: for example, his Grande Sonate ‘Les Quatre Âges’ is a cycle describing different stages of life, with tempos that gradually slow down over the course of the movements.

4. An expressive universe between romanticism and mysticism

Although Alkan is often seen as a virtuoso pianist, his music also reveals a profound sensitivity. It oscillates between a sombre romanticism and a mystical introspection:

His works often express an extreme dramatic intensity, sometimes almost anguishing (Overture for piano, Op. 39),
He composed pieces of great tenderness and delicacy, such as his Chants, which recall Chopin’s preludes,
His attachment to religious texts is evident in some of his compositions, notably his pieces for organ and his Trois Grandes Prières, which reveal a deep spirituality.

5. An overlooked but influential work

Despite his withdrawal from the musical world, Alkan left a lasting impression, influencing pianists such as Busoni, Godowsky and, more recently, Marc-André Hamelin. His music remained in the shadows for a long time, but today it is recognised for its modernity and its extraordinary pianistic richness.

In short, Alkan is a composer in a class of his own: a genius virtuoso, harmonic explorer and visionary whose music, both monumental and intimate, continues to fascinate and challenge pianists around the world.

Relations

Charles-Valentin Alkan, although a rather solitary figure, maintained relationships with several major figures of his time. His circle included famous composers, virtuoso performers and some influential personalities from outside the musical world. However, his reserved temperament and gradual withdrawal from public life limited his direct influence on those around him.

1. His relationships with other composers

Chopin (1810-1849) – Friendship and mutual influence

Alkan and Frédéric Chopin were close, frequenting each other in Parisian salons. We know that Alkan greatly admired Chopin and played some of his works, particularly at private concerts. Chopin, for his part, probably appreciated Alkan’s originality, although their styles differed: Chopin favoured fluidity and direct emotion, while Alkan pushed virtuosity and harmonic experimentation to the extreme.

An interesting detail: after Chopin’s death in 1849, it was Alkan who retrieved the manuscript of his Sonata for Cello and Piano and facilitated its publication. This gesture testifies to a deep esteem.

Liszt (1811-1886) – Mutual admiration and silent rivalry

Liszt and Alkan were two of the greatest virtuosos of the 19th century. Liszt is said to have expressed great admiration for Alkan’s music, and some believe he was influenced by his orchestral writing for piano. However, Alkan, who was much more reserved, seems to have maintained a certain distance. Unlike Liszt, who was a charismatic public figure, Alkan preferred to work alone in the shadows.

Mendelssohn (1809-1847) – A one-way admiration

Alkan revered Felix Mendelssohn and considered his music a model of balance and clarity. He even transcribed several of Mendelssohn’s works for the piano. Mendelssohn, on the other hand, does not seem to have paid particular attention to Alkan.

Saint-Saëns (1835-1921) – Student and posthumous defender

Camille Saint-Saëns, younger than Alkan, was one of his few direct pupils. He greatly admired his teacher and played some of his works, notably his Concerto for Solo Piano. He later contributed to the rediscovery of Alkan by praising his genius and performing his music.

2. Relations with performers and teachers

Élie-Miriam Delaborde (1839-1913) – A mysterious pupil and spiritual heir

Delaborde, supposedly Liszt’s illegitimate son, was one of Alkan’s closest pupils. He played some of his works and contributed, to some extent, to preserving his musical legacy. However, he did not succeed in making him as famous as Liszt or Chopin.

Antoine Marmontel (1816-1898) – A colleague at the Conservatoire
Marmontel, an influential professor at the Paris Conservatoire, mentions Alkan in his writings, describing him as a solitary genius who was difficult to approach. Marmontel would play a role in keeping Alkan’s memory alive after his death.

3. Relations with orchestras and the institutional music world

Unlike his contemporaries, Alkan had little interaction with orchestras. He never held an official position in a musical institution and rarely wrote for the orchestra, preferring to transpose the orchestral breadth to the piano. His Concerto for Solo Piano, for example, is a way of circumventing the absence of an orchestra by simulating all its power with a single instrument.

However, he would have been frustrated not to have obtained a teaching post at the Paris Conservatoire in 1848, which could have contributed to his withdrawal from the music scene.

4. Relationships with people outside the music world

His family – A strong bond, but poorly documented

Alkan came from a cultured Jewish family. His father, Alkan Morhange, ran a music school where several of his brothers also studied. He seems to have remained attached to his family roots and to Jewish culture, which is evident in some of his works (Trois Grandes Prières).

Léon Halévy (1802-1883) – An intellectual friend and poet

Léon Halévy, writer and brother of Jacques Fromental Halévy (composer of La Juive), was a close friend of Alkan’s. Both shared an interest in philosophy and Jewish culture. It is possible that their discussions influenced Alkan’s spiritual and literary thinking.

Conclusion: A solitary genius surrounded by discreet admirers

Alkan knew many great musicians and intellectuals, but he remained on the margins of the musical life of his time. His friendship with Chopin and his admiration for Mendelssohn show his attachment to the great romantics, while his relationships with Saint-Saëns and Delaborde ensured a certain continuity of his legacy. However, his withdrawal from the world of concerts and institutions kept him in semi-obscurity, and his influence was not fully realised until the 20th century, thanks to pianists fascinated by his music.

Similar composers

Composers similar to Charles-Valentin Alkan

Alkan’s music is unique, but some composers share common traits with him, whether in terms of pianistic virtuosity, harmonic experimentation or formal originality. Here are a few figures who can be compared to him.

1. Franz Liszt (1811-1886) – Transcendent virtuosity

Liszt is undoubtedly the composer closest to Alkan in terms of pianistic virtuosity. Both pushed the limits of the instrument, creating works of extreme technical difficulty. However, where Liszt is more theatrical and expressive, Alkan is often more cerebral and solitary. Their respective Transcendental Etudes share a similar ambition, although Alkan’s style is more abrupt and mysterious.

Comparable works:

Concerto for Solo Piano (Alkan) ↔ Sonata in B Minor (Liszt)
The Feast of Aesop (Alkan) ↔ Paganini’s Great Etudes (Liszt)

2. Leopold Godowsky (1870-1938) – Polyphonic complexity

Godowsky, like Alkan, is a master of polyphony on the piano. His studies on Chopin’s Études and his arrangements that defy human capabilities are reminiscent of Alkan’s approach, which transformed the piano into a miniature orchestra. Both love to exploit the independence of the hands and dense pianistic textures.

Comparable works:

Symphony for Solo Piano (Alkan) ↔ Études sur les Études de Chopin (Godowsky)

3. Ferruccio Busoni (1866-1924) – Harmonic and contrapuntal experimentation

Busoni shared with Alkan a fascination for the piano rewriting of orchestral music and a taste for dense polyphony. His harmonic language, although later, heralded some of Alkan’s audacity, particularly in his use of modes and harmonic colours that were unheard of at the time.

Comparable works:

Ouverture for piano (Alkan) ↔ Fantasia contrappuntistica (Busoni)

4. Kaikhosru Sorabji (1892-1988) – Pianistic excess and eccentricity

Sorabji is one of the few composers whose music surpasses Alkan’s in complexity and duration. Like Alkan, he composed titanic works for solo piano (Opus Clavicembalisticum, his Transcendental Etudes), with lush harmonies and overwhelming textures. His taste for monumental forms is reminiscent of Alkan’s.

Comparable works:

Concerto for solo piano (Alkan) ↔ Opus Clavicembalisticum (Sorabji)

5. Nikolai Medtner (1880-1951) – Lyricism and rigorous construction

Medtner was a Russian composer who, like Alkan, remained on the fringes of the mainstream. His sonatas and piano tales combine great virtuosity with contrapuntal rigour and a sometimes austere romanticism. He shares with Alkan a tendency towards introspection and complex formal elaboration.

Comparable works:

Grande Sonate ‘Les Quatre Âges’ (Alkan) ↔ Sonatas for piano (Medtner)

6. Alexander Scriabin (1872-1915) – Harmonic originality and spirituality

Although Scriabin is more mystical and symbolist, some of his harmonic daring and his approach to the piano as a vehicle for a total sound experience evoke Alkan. Both push back the tonal conventions of their time and experiment with new chords.

Comparable works:

Three Great Prayers (Alkan) ↔ Sonata No. 7 ‘White Mass’ (Scriabin)

Conclusion

Alkan is unique in the history of music, but aspects of his style can be found in several composers: virtuosity and orchestral breadth in Liszt and Sorabji, contrapuntal complexity in Godowsky and Busoni, harmonic depth in Scriabin, and formal rigour in Medtner. He remains an unclassifiable composer, oscillating between exacerbated romanticism and visionary modernity.

Relationships

Although Alkan led a relatively solitary life, he maintained relationships with several major figures of his time, including composers, pianists, intellectuals and some musical institutions. However, his introverted character and long withdrawal from the public eye limited his interactions and recognition during his lifetime.

1. Relations with other composers

Frédéric Chopin (1810-1849) – A friend and respected model

Alkan and Chopin were friends and regularly saw each other at Parisian salons. Alkan deeply admired Chopin and played his works, particularly at private concerts. He was even said to be one of the few people to have a handwritten copy of Chopin’s Sonata for Cello and Piano after his death.

Although their styles differ (Chopin favouring poetry and fluidity, while Alkan explored power and harmonic experimentation), one finds in Alkan an influence of Chopin in his more lyrical pieces such as the Chants or some of his études.

Franz Liszt (1811-1886) – A mutual admiration, but distant

Liszt, recognised as the greatest virtuoso of his time, knew and appreciated Alkan’s music. He even encouraged him to give concerts. Alkan, however, was not such a fervent admirer of Liszt. Unlike the latter, who shone on stage and in salons, Alkan was introverted and preferred to work alone.

A famous anecdote has it that Alkan once asked Liszt why he did not play his works in concert, to which Liszt is said to have replied that no one could perform them properly.

Felix Mendelssohn (1809-1847) – A non-reciprocal admiration

Alkan had unconditional admiration for Mendelssohn, whom he considered a model of musical balance and clarity. He also transcribed several of Mendelssohn’s works for piano, including pieces from Handel’s Messiah in Mendelssohn’s arrangement.

However, Mendelssohn does not seem to have shown any particular interest in Alkan.

Camille Saint-Saëns (1835-1921) – Student and posthumous advocate

Saint-Saëns studied with Alkan and always championed him after his death. He praised the originality of his writing and contributed to the rediscovery of some of his works. As a pianist and organist, he was one of the few renowned musicians to promote Alkan’s music, notably by playing his Concerto for Solo Piano.

2. Relations with performers and teachers

Élie-Miriam Delaborde (1839-1913) – A privileged pupil and spiritual heir

Delaborde, supposedly Liszt’s illegitimate son, was one of Alkan’s closest pupils. He performed several of his works and kept part of his repertoire. However, his influence on Alkan’s posterity remains limited, as he did not contribute to the widespread dissemination of his works.

Antoine Marmontel (1816-1898) – A colleague at the Conservatoire

Marmontel, a professor at the Paris Conservatoire, knew Alkan and mentioned him in his writings. He described him as a solitary genius, withdrawn but with an extraordinary musical intelligence.

3. Relations with orchestras and musical institutions

Unlike most composers of his time, Alkan never held an official post in a major musical institution and never had a close relationship with an orchestra. He did, however, apply for a professorship at the Paris Conservatoire in 1848, but he did not get the job, which may have contributed to his gradual withdrawal from public life.

He also composed a few orchestral works (including an Overture for orchestra and a Concerto da camera), but these remain marginal in his catalogue. Most of his compositions transpose orchestral sounds to the piano, as is the case with his monumental Concerto for Solo Piano.

4. Relations with non-musical personalities

His family – A musical and intellectual environment
Alkan came from an educated Jewish family. His father, Alkan Morhange, ran a music school where several of his brothers also studied. His brother Napoleon Alkan played a role in his musical education.

His Jewish identity also influenced some of his works, notably his Three Great Prayers and other compositions inspired by Hebrew music.

Léon Halévy (1802-1883) – An intellectual and close friend

Léon Halévy, writer and brother of the composer Jacques Fromental Halévy (La Juive), was a close friend of Alkan. Both shared an interest in philosophy, literature and religious texts. It is possible that their discussions nourished the mystical and intellectual aspects of Alkan’s music.

5. A man on the margins of his time

Alkan maintained relationships with some of the greatest musicians of the 19th century, but his secretive character and distance from the concert world kept him on the fringes of Parisian musical life. His links with Chopin and Liszt show his integration into the circle of virtuosos, but his voluntary withdrawal distanced him from the major institutions and networks of musical dissemination.

Today, thanks to performers such as Raymond Lewenthal, Ronald Smith and Marc-André Hamelin, his work has regained a well-deserved place among the greatest piano music of the 19th century.

Famous works for solo piano

Alkan is best known for his solo piano pieces, which combine extreme virtuosity, innovative harmonic imagination and orchestral writing transposed to the keyboard. Here are some of his most outstanding works.

1. Concerto for Solo Piano, Op. 39 No. 8-10 (1857)

An orchestra under the fingers of a single pianist

This Concerto for Solo Piano is a monumental work, one of the most impressive ever written for the piano. It is part of the collection Twelve Etudes in All Minor Keys, but it stands out for its atypical form: a true concertante work without an orchestra.

🔹 I. Allegro assai – A heroic and symphonic first movement, with dazzling passages that imitate the different sections of an orchestra.
🔹 II. Adagio – A lyrical and introspective meditation, sometimes compared to Chopin’s nocturnes, but with an intensity specific to Alkan.
🔹 III. Allegretto alla barbaresca – A wild and rhythmic finale, where the piano becomes a veritable sound machine, in a whirlwind of chords and octaves.

👉 This work is considered a pinnacle of the piano repertoire, of formidable difficulty and unparalleled musical richness.

2. Symphony for Solo Piano, Op. 39 No. 4-7 (1857)

A symphony without an orchestra

Like his Concerto for Solo Piano, this Symphony for Solo Piano also belongs to the Twelve Etudes in All Minor Keys. In it, Alkan explores a fascinating pianistic orchestration, in which each hand plays a distinct role, simulating the different sections of an orchestra.

🔹 I. Allegro – A dramatic movement with powerful contrasts and an impressive orchestral density.
🔹 II. Funeral March – A sombre and solemn march, with poignant gravity, reminiscent of those of Mahler or Chopin.
🔹 III. Minuet – A lighter, dance-like moment, contrasting with the other movements.
🔹 IV. Finale presto – A breathtaking finale in which Alkan unleashes bursts of notes and irresistible energy.

👉 Less famous than the Concerto for Solo Piano, this symphony remains a masterpiece of orchestral transcription for the piano.

3. The Feast of Aesop, Op. 39 No. 12 (1857)

An explosion of animalistic variations

This piece is the last of the Twelve Études in all Minor Keys and is often considered one of Alkan’s masterpieces. It is a theme followed by 25 variations in which the composer evokes, in all likelihood, animals feasting, in homage to Aesop’s fables.

Each variation explores a different character:
🐦 Light trills evoke birds.
🐻 Massive chords recall a heavy and powerful bear.
🐭 Rapid scales suggest the flight of a small creature.

👉 An original work, full of humour and inventiveness, but also technically formidable.

4. Grande Sonate ‘Les Quatre Âges’, Op. 33 (1847)

A philosophical sonata on the passage of time

In this four-movement sonata, Alkan musically illustrates the different stages of human life, from youth to old age:

🔹 I. ‘20 years – Very fast’ – An impetuous and fiery movement, symbolising youth in all its exuberance.
🔹 II. ‘30 years – Quite slowly’ – A more composed and reflective movement, marked by melancholy and depth.
🔹 III. ‘40 years – Slowly’ – A slow and solemn march, where the weight of the years is felt.
🔹 IV. ‘50 years – Extremely slowly’ – An almost funeral, minimalist movement, which fades away in a poignant silence.

👉 This sonata is a unique introspective and philosophical testimony of a disturbing modernity.

5. Études in all major keys, Op. 35 (1853)

Another series of virtuoso studies

These studies, often compared to Liszt’s Transcendental Etudes, cover a wide range of styles and technical difficulties. Among the most famous are:

🎵 Op. 35 No. 7 – The Fire in the Neighbouring Village – a dramatic piece that evokes the panic of a village in flames.
🎵 Op. 35 No. 9 – Allegro barbaro – a hammering étude, foreshadowing certain aspects of Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring.

👉 These études demonstrate Alkan’s harmonic audacity and taste for musical narration.

6. Three Grandes Études, Op. 76 (1838)

A demonstration of extreme virtuosity

These études are a formidable challenge for any pianist:

🔹 Study No. 1 for the right hand alone – A cascade of arpeggios and dazzling strokes played only with the right hand.
🔹 Study No. 2 for the left hand alone – A technical feat in which the left hand must assume all the harmony and melody.
🔹 Study No. 3 for both hands together – A pianistic firework combining the challenges of the first two studies.

👉 A work that illustrates Alkan’s obsession with virtuosity and the independence of the hands.

Conclusion

Alkan’s music is a unique synthesis of Liszt’s virtuosity, Chopin’s inwardness and Scriabin’s harmonic inventiveness ahead of its time. His solo piano works push the boundaries of the instrument and offer an extraordinary musical experience. Yet they remain little known and underestimated, often considered too difficult to perform. Fortunately, modern pianists such as Marc-André Hamelin, Jack Gibbons and Raymond Lewenthal have enabled them to be rediscovered.

Famous works

Although Alkan is mainly known for his works for solo piano, he also composed a few pieces for other ensembles, including chamber music, orchestra and organ. His most outstanding works outside of solo piano are as follows:

1. Chamber music

🎻 Concert Sonata for Cello and Piano, Op. 47 (1856)

One of Alkan’s few great chamber music works.
A very demanding sonata for both instruments, with a style that is both lyrical and dramatic.
Often compared to the cello sonatas of Chopin and Mendelssohn.

🎻 Three pieces in the pathetic genre, Op. 15 (1837)

A suite for cello and piano, with a romantic and expressive style.
One of the rare examples of Alkan’s lyricism in a more intimate setting.

🎻 Adagio for horn and piano, Op. 13

A gentle and elegant piece, contrasting with the composer’s usual virtuoso style.

2. Orchestral music

🎼 Overture for orchestra, Op. 8 (1834)

One of Alkan’s few pieces written for a full orchestra.
Influenced by Beethoven and Mendelssohn, with energetic and dramatic writing.
Unfortunately, it is rarely played today.

🎼 Concerto da camera No. 1 & No. 2 for piano and orchestra, posthumous opus

Two works that combine Alkan’s pianistic virtuosity with a reduced orchestral accompaniment.
The style is similar to the concertos of Chopin or Hummel.

3. Music for organ and harmonium

🎹 Eleven Grand Preludes and a transcription by Mozart for organ or piano, Op. 66 (1866)

One of Alkan’s major contributions to organ music.
These pieces, although playable on the piano, fully exploit the organ’s sound possibilities.

🎹 Impromptu on Luther’s chorale ‘A Mighty Fortress Is Our God’, Op. 69

A piece inspired by Luther’s famous chorale, written in a rich contrapuntal and harmonic style.

🎹 Petite fantaisie sur les airs de l’opéra ‘Lucia di Lammermoor’ de Donizetti, Op. 41

A brilliant fantasy based on themes by Donizetti, in a style similar to Liszt’s transcriptions.

4. Vocal music

🎤 Super flumina Babylonis, Op. 52 (1857)

A setting to music of Psalm 137 (‘By the rivers of Babylon’), for voice and piano or organ.
Testifies to Alkan’s interest in sacred and Hebrew music.

🎤 Three Prayers for Voice and Organ, Op. 64

Works inspired by the Jewish tradition, with a sober and expressive style.

🎤 Collection of Songs for Voice and Piano

Contains a variety of melodies, often influenced by folk and sacred music.

Conclusion

Although the majority of Alkan’s output is for solo piano, these works show that he also had an interest in other musical forms. His orchestral style transposed to the piano may explain why his orchestral and chamber music compositions are rare, but they deserve to be better known.

(This article was generated by ChatGPT. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)

Classic Music Content Page

Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube

Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify

Jean-Michel Serres Apfel Café Music QR Codes Center English 2024.