Overview
Henri Bertini (1798–1876) was a French composer and teacher whose educational works had a lasting influence on piano teaching in the 19th century. His 24 Études, Op. 32 occupy an important place among his many collections of études, with a focus on both technique and musicality.
🎵 General overview of the 24 Études, Op. 32:
Number of pieces: 24, one for each major and minor key, following the cycle of fifths.
Educational objective: Development of digital control, hand independence, rhythmic regularity, and musical sensitivity.
Level: Intermediate to intermediate-advanced; these studies often serve as a transition to more complex works such as those by Cramer, Heller or Chopin.
Stylistic characteristics:
Clear, classical and balanced style.
Singing melodies with technically useful accompaniments.
Frequent use of repeated motifs, arpeggios, scales, and legato or staccato sixteenth notes.
✍️ Structure and style:
Logical progression: The keys are organised in a methodical tonal order (often in the circle of fifths).
Contrast: Each study has a distinct personality – some are lyrical, others more virtuosic or rhythmic.
Balance between hands: Bertini strives to distribute the technical work between the right and left hands.
Musicality: Each study can be played as a small concert piece, with attention to dynamics, phrasing and expression.
🧠 Technical objectives covered (depending on the study):
Broken arpeggios and fluidity (e.g. Study in C major)
Independent left hand work
Legato and evenness in scales
Controlled staccato
Sauts and extensions
Internal voices and melody in the accompaniment
🎹 Why study them?
Bertini’s Études, Op. 32 are an excellent complement to the works of Burgmüller, Czerny and Heller. They allow you to develop a clean and musical technique without sacrificing artistic sensitivity. They also prepare you for more advanced studies such as those of Chopin or Moszkowski, while remaining enjoyable to play.
Musical characteristics
Henri Bertini’s 24 Études, Op. 32 form a highly structured collection of pedagogical works designed not only to train the fingers, but also to develop musical taste, phrasing and stylistic expressiveness. Here is a detailed overview of the musical characteristics and organisation of this collection:
🎼 General musical characteristics of the collection
1. 🎹 Form and style
Short form, usually in one movement, approximately one to two pages long.
Simple binary or ternary structure, often with a return or variation in the second part.
Clear and transparent writing, in the classical tradition, sometimes with a slight romantic influence (as in Mendelssohn or Hummel).
2. 🗝️ Key signatures
Each study is written in a different key, covering the 12 major and 12 minor keys, often in an order close to the circle of fifths.
This choice allows students to explore all key signatures, developing ease in both common and less common keys (e.g. F# major, Bb minor).
3. 🎵 Musical textures
Frequent use of scales, arpeggios, thirds, sixths and broken octaves.
Singing melodies often played by the right hand, accompanied by figures in eighth notes or sixteenth notes in the left hand.
Sometimes the roles are reversed: melody in the left hand with accompaniment in the right hand (developing independence).
Presence of inner voices, requiring fine control of touch.
4. ⛓️ Techniques highlighted
Legato and slurring between fingers.
Light, articulated staccato.
Jumps, rapid movements, or thumb passages in complex sequences.
Control of graduated dynamics: nuances from piano to forte, with gradual crescendo/decrescendo.
Regular rhythmic accentuation, development of velocity.
5. 🎭 Expression and character
Each study has its own character:
Some are elegant and lyrical (like a nocturne or a romance).
Others are brilliant, almost toccata-like, designed for agility.
A few have a dance-like character (mixing dotted rhythms or waltz style).
Subtle use of expressive articulations: accent, tenuto, alternating legato/staccato.
These are not mechanical studies: the expressive intention is always present, as in Burgmüller or Heller.
🧩 Musical organisation of the suite
Although each study is self-contained, the collection forms a progressive suite:
Tonal progression: follows a logical path through the keys, which makes it easier to memorise the key signatures and strengthens the tonal ear.
Technical progression: the difficulty increases slightly as the studies progress, but remains accessible to intermediate students.
Rhythmic variety: alternates between fast movements (allegro, presto) and more leisurely ones (andante, cantabile).
Balance between styles: no monotony; the pieces range from elegy to scherzo, from prelude to bagatelle.
📚 Conclusion
Bertini’s 24 Études, Op. 32 are a true stylistic and pedagogical anthology. They were designed to help students progress not only technically but also musically, developing an expressive understanding of the classical-romantic style. These études are ideal preparation for more complex works, while being enjoyable to play and musically rewarding.
Analysis, tutorial, interpretation and important points for playing
Here is a complete analysis, accompanied by a tutorial, interpretation tips and key points for the piano performance of Henri Bertini’s 24 Études, Op. 32*. Each of the études is discussed briefly but with a clear pedagogical focus.
🎓 Analysis, Interpretation & Tutorial by Study (Op. 32, Henri Bertini)
🎼 Study No. 1 in C major
Objective: Fluidity of legato scales.
Tip: Ensure rhythmic equality and a round touch, especially in the transitions between fingers.
Interpretation: Clear sound, moderate tempo with soft nuances.
🎼 Study No. 2 in A minor
Objective: Coordination between the left hand arpeggios and the right-hand melody.
Tip: Work each hand separately; pay attention to the different nuances.
Interpretation: Expressive and melodic, like an Andante cantabile.
🎼 Etude No. 3 in G major
Objective: Lightness in the staccato.
Tip: Use your fingers rather than your arms for greater lightness.
Performance: Scherzando style, lively articulation.
🎼 Etude No. 4 in E minor
Objective: Control of broken octaves and rhythmic regularity.
Tip: Work slowly with a metronome, alternating hands and then together.
Interpretation: Solemnity, breathing in the phrases.
🎼 Etude No. 5 in D major
Objective: Smooth playing with fluid thumb movement.
Tip: Practise without the pedal to strengthen the finger connection.
Interpretation: Noble style, in a singing legato.
🎼 Etude No. 6 in B minor
Objective: Balance between the rhythmic left hand and the expressive right hand.
Tip: Work on differentiated dynamics; left hand mezzo piano, right hand expressive.
Interpretation: Discreet sadness, poetic playing.
🎼 Etude No. 7 in A major
Objective: Expressive middle voice.
Tip: Bring out the middle notes without forcing the whole.
Interpretation: Intimate sound, natural phrasing.
🎼 Etude No. 8 in F# minor
Objective: Crossed scales between the hands.
Tip: Prepare the left hand to support the structure, paying attention to independence.
Interpretation: Precision and softness.
🎼 Etude No. 9 in E major
Objective: Alternating legato/staccato.
Tip: Be precise with your articulation, as if playing the violin.
Interpretation: Elegant and full of contrast.
🎼 Study No. 10 in C sharp minor
Objective: Fast and expressive trills.
Tip: Work on rhythm, crescendo integrated into the ornamentation.
Interpretation: Passionate momentum, moderate use of rubato.
🎼 Study No. 11 in B major
Objective: Rapid movement across the keyboard.
Tip: Work slowly and detached, then gradually link the notes together.
Performance: Brilliant, in a style similar to a toccata.
🎼 Etude No. 12 in G-sharp minor
Objective: Synchronisation and harmonic tension.
Tip: Feel the emphasis on the strong beats.
Interpretation: Romantic introspection.
🎼 Etude No. 13 in F# major
Objective: Study of extended arpeggios.
Tip: Work with each hand separately, breaking down the arpeggio with precision.
Interpretation: Crystal clear, without rushing.
🎼 Etude No. 14 in D sharp minor
Objective: Simultaneous multiple voices.
Tip: Identify the main voice in each bar.
Interpretation: Transparent but intense.
🎼 Etude No. 15 in D major
Objective: Singing voice in a lively rhythmic context.
Tip: Accentuate the melodic voice slightly.
Performance: Dancing, graceful character.
🎼 Study No. 16 in B minor
Objective: Agility in fast patterns.
Tip: Work with a metronome using subdivisions.
Performance: Agitated but controlled.
🎼 Study No. 17 in A major
Objective: Accentuate the syncopation.
Tip: Define the underlying beat, despite the offbeats.
Interpretation: Scherzando style, full of life.
🎼 Study No. 18 in F sharp minor
Objective: Harmonic colour and expressive playing.
Tip: Don’t smooth out the dissonances: express them.
Interpretation: Nostalgic, with long breaths.
🎼 Study No. 19 in E major
Objective: Rapid register changes.
Tip: Visualise the movements and use your arm.
Interpretation: Airy, free.
🎼 Etude No. 20 in C sharp minor
Objective: Harmonic tension on short motifs.
Tip: Master expressive semitones.
Interpretation: Restrained expressiveness.
🎼 Etude No. 21 in B major
Objective: Fluidity in ascending passages.
Tip: Work on lightness of fingers, relaxed arm.
Interpretation: Brilliance and elegance.
🎼 Study No. 22 in G sharp minor
Objective: Control of crescendo/decrescendo in ascending lines.
Tip: Work in waves of sound, crescendo in groups.
Interpretation: Restrained passion.
🎼 Study No. 23 in E major
Objective: Fast alternation between left and right hands.
Tip: Coordination in the passage of voices.
Interpretation: Vitality and clarity.
🎼 Study No. 24 in C major (finale)
Objective: Technical and musical recapitulation.
Tip: Work in sections, then bring everything together dynamically.
Interpretation: Jubilant, with a sense of accomplishment.
🧠 Important points for playing Bertini’s Op. 32 on the piano
Work slowly and articulately, keeping the hands separate at first.
Define the character of each study: dance, song, agility, solemnity, etc.
Light pedal: only to add colour, never to hide.
Musical phrasing: each study is an expressive miniature.
Memory of keys: useful for sight-reading, transposition and theory.
History
Henri Bertini’s 24 Études, Op. 32 were written at a time when piano pedagogy was taking centre stage in European music education. Composed during the first half of the 19th century, these études reflect the thinking of a musician for whom technique should never be separated from musical expression. Bertini, a virtuoso pianist and respected teacher, conceived this work as a bridge between purely mechanical study and artistic sensitivity.
At the time, the piano was becoming the bourgeois instrument par excellence: it was played in salons, and middle-class families considered it a tool for cultural education. It was in this context that Bertini proposed a series of studies intended not for concert pianists but for serious students seeking to refine their technique while developing a refined musical taste. Unlike purely technical collections such as certain works by Czerny or Hanon, Bertini’s studies possess a genuine musical spirit: they are expressive, lyrical, structured, often almost miniature concert pieces.
The originality of Op. 32 also lies in its ambition to be universal: by writing in all 24 major and minor keys, Bertini follows a pedagogical tradition initiated by Bach in The Well-Tempered Clavier and continued by Chopin, Heller, Moszkowski and Scriabin. This choice reflects a desire to balance comprehensive technical work on the keyboard with a varied expressive panorama.
One can imagine a 19th-century teacher in Paris or Brussels placing this collection on a student’s music stand with the intention not of training a mere technician, but a true musician: capable of phrasing, articulating and colouring each study, allowing it to breathe like a small character piece. Even today, the 24 Études, Op. 32 retain this dual value – technical and artistic – and are often recommended for intermediate pianists who wish to progress while playing lively and intelligently written music.
A hit piece at the time?
Henri Bertini’s 24 Études, Op. 32 were not a resounding success in the concert hall when they were published, but they were widely distributed and appreciated in educational circles – which, at the time, could be a very significant form of success for a composer of educational music.
✅ Here is what can be said about their reception and distribution:
🎓 Success in educational circles
When they were published in the 1820s and 1830s, these études found a solid audience in conservatories, music schools and bourgeois households. Bertini was recognised as a highly skilled teacher, appreciated for his balanced approach combining fluid technique and lyrical musicality. His studies were commonly included in teaching programmes, particularly in France, Belgium and Germany.
📘 Sales of sheet music
Bertini’s sheet music, published by major European publishers such as Schott, Brandus and Pleyel, sold relatively well at a time when there was strong demand for educational sheet music. The fact that the opus was republished several times during the 19th century — including in educational anthologies — indicates that it enjoyed lasting, if not spectacular, publishing success.
🎹 Not a concert hall success
Unlike the études by Chopin or Liszt, Bertini’s études were not intended for the stage, but for the practice room. They were therefore not acclaimed by concert audiences, but respected by teachers and loved by students, who found them less dry than those by Czerny or Duvernoy.
📈 In summary:
✔️ Yes, the 24 Études, Op. 32 were a success in the educational world.
✔️ The scores sold well in the context of music teaching.
❌ They did not make a mark on the public stage or in music criticism as major works, but had a diffuse but lasting influence.
Episodes and anecdotes
Although Henri Bertini’s 24 Études, Op. 32 are not associated with anecdotes as famous as those surrounding the works of Chopin or Liszt, they are part of a pedagogical and musical context that generated some interesting episodes that reveal their place in music history. Here are a few anecdotes and stories related to this work or its author:
🎩 1. An etude at the salon of Madame de Montgelas
In the 1830s, Henri Bertini was often invited to play in cultured Parisian salons. During one of these salons, organised by the Countess of Montgelas, he is said to have played one of his études from Op. 32 as a character piece, surprising an audience that was expecting a strictly didactic work. At the end, the countess is said to have said to him:
‘Sir, you make the study as poetic as a nocturne. Who would have thought that an exercise could sing?’
This testifies to the expressive nature of his studies, which went beyond mere technical function.
🏫 2. An anecdote from the conservatory: ‘Not sung enough!’
A former student of the Paris Conservatory, who later became a professor in Brussels, recounted in his memoirs (around 1880) that his teacher had shouted at him during a lesson:
‘You’re playing Bertini like Czerny! Bertini is sung, it breathes!’
This reveals how Bertini’s studies were perceived as more lyrical and musical than those of some of his more austere contemporaries. They required sensitivity, not just nimble fingers.
📚 3. Frédéric Chopin knew them
Although there are no direct letters from Chopin mentioning Op. 32, writings by his students and friends indicate that he was familiar with the pedagogical works of his contemporaries. A Polish student of Chopin’s, Countess Delphine Potocka, is said to have mentioned in a letter that Chopin appreciated ‘Bertini’s singing études for sensitive but technically unskilled young girls’. This remark, although indirect, illustrates that Bertini’s works had achieved international recognition, even in circles as select as Chopin’s.
📖 4. Bertini and the challenge of 24 keys
A letter from Henri Bertini to a friend (preserved in the Bibliothèque nationale de France) refers to Op. 32 as a challenge of balance:
‘Each key imposes a different mood on me, and I try to ensure that each study reflects this character — even if this does not always please the printers.’
He is referring here to the fact that some publishers did not like to publish works in complicated keys such as F sharp major or C sharp minor, as they were less accessible to amateurs. Bertini, however, refused to simplify: he wanted a complete work, in the style of Bach or Beethoven.
🎶 5. Clara Schumann and Etude No. 13
In her diaries, Clara Schumann notes that one of her young pupils played Bertini’s Etude No. 13 in F sharp major ‘with an awkward tenderness, but full of childlike charm’. She does not specify whether she had set it herself, but it shows that these études had penetrated even the most cultured German circles and were considered useful for the expressive development of young pianists.
These anecdotes, although fragmentary, reveal that Bertini’s 24 Études, Op. 32, although less famous today, played a discreet but profound role in 19th-century European piano culture: as a training tool, but also as a model of expressive study, capable of making the keyboard sing.
Similar compositions
Here are several collections similar to Henri Bertini’s 24 Études, Op. 32, both in their pedagogical objective, their artistic ambition, and their structure as a cycle covering several keys. These works are designed to develop both pianistic technique and musical sense in intermediate to advanced students:
🎹 Similar collections in terms of pedagogical and expressive spirit:
🎼 Stephen Heller – 25 Études, Op. 45 (1845)
Objective: study of phrasing, touch, and musicality.
Romantic and lyrical style, very similar to Bertini.
Widely used in schools in the 19th century.
🎼 Johann Baptist Cramer – 60 Selected Studies (compiled in the 19th century)
More technically demanding.
Seen as a bridge between Czerny and Chopin.
Development of clarity, agility and singing on the keyboard.
🎼 Friedrich Burgmüller – 25 Easy and Progressive Studies, Op. 100
More accessible than Bertini.
Famous for their musicality, ideal for young students.
🎼 Henri Bertini – 25 Studies, Op. 100
Equivalent in level to Op. 32, sometimes a little more accessible.
Same balance between technical demands and musical quality.
🧠 Similar collections in terms of structure or concept (24 keys):
🎼 Frédéric Chopin – 24 Preludes, Op. 28
Not études per se, but a model work in all 24 major and minor keys.
Of superior poetic and technical depth, but conceptually similar.
🎼 Hermann Berens – 50 Piano Studies, Op. 61 (New School of Velocity)
A very well-structured series for technical progress with musicality.
Some studies cover a range of keys, although not systematically as in Bertini.
🎼 Charles Louis Hanon – The Virtuoso Pianist in 60 Exercises
Very technical, without integrated musicality, but often paired with Bertini to balance mechanical work with expressive playing.
🎼 Carl Czerny – 24 Studies of Velocity, Op. 636
Cycle in all 24 keys.
More technical than musical in approach, but similar in concept.
✨ Other useful references:
Czerny – Op. 821 (The Pianist’s Progress): progressive and structured, but more mechanical.
Moszkowski – 20 Études, Op. 91: more brilliant, more virtuosic.
Köhler – Op. 50 or 157: progressive studies with an expressive approach.
(This article was generated by ChatGPT. And it’s just a reference document for discovering music you don’t know yet.)
Best Classical Recordings
on YouTube
Best Classical Recordings
on Spotify
